Good Idea/Bad Idea

Good Idea/Bad Idea Looks at Operating Systems

Dan Knight - 2002.11.27

In the beginning of personal computing, there were no operating systems, for there was almost nothing to operate on. Then came floppy drives and controllers, creating the need for Apples and Ataris and TRS-80s and the like to communicate with random access media.

Each brand had its own OS: Apple DOS, TRS-DOS, and so forth. And then came CP/M, a standard OS that computers designed around the 8080, Z80, and 8085 could use. And it was good.

Then came the IBM PC with three OS alternatives: CP/M-86, the UCSD p-System, and something from Microsoft called PC-DOS.

Today Good Idea/Bad Idea looks at what happens when users choose operating systems.

Good Idea

IBM didn't think much of the PC industry in those days and fully expected their 5150 to fail, so they did all they could to keep development costs down. They used an existing Intel CPU (a 16-bit one crippled for an 8-bit bus) and other off the shelf parts, which also paved the way for clones.

And, rather than create their own OS, IBM gave users a choice. They could choose CP/M-86, the logical outgrowth of the industry standard 8-bit CP/M. Or they could choose the OS of academia, the UCSD p-System. Or they could choose the upstart OS, which was cleverly named PC-DOS and sold for a lot less than the alternatives.

The rest is history. Microsoft's DOS became the de facto standard, and today Microsoft operating systems run about 90% of the world's personal computers.

Success: MS-DOS. 'Nuff said.

Success: Microsoft Windows, especially since version 3.1.

Bad Idea

Competing with the industry standard operating system.

Failure: CP/M was the first casualty of the success of the IBM PC and Microsoft's DOS.

Failure: All of the other 8-bit computers and their operating systems. Only the Apple IIGS managed a slightly successful transition to the 16-bit world, but it was too little too late.

Failure: The UCSD p-System.

Failure: Digital Research's CP/M-86 and the multiuser MP/M-86.

Failure: Digital Research's DR-DOS, mostly due to fallacious error messages generated by the Microsoft Windows 3.1 installer claiming Windows was not compatible with DR-DOS.

Failure: OS/2, initially a joint project of IBM and Microsoft to create a next generation OS to replace DOS. Microsoft took what it learned, applied it to Windows, and left IBM with a great OS that failed in the marketplace.

Conclusion

Throughout this period, Unix has persisted, the Mac OS has become the leading desktop alternative to Windows, and Linux is the leading alternative OS for industry standard hardware. Between them, these operating systems account for maybe 10% of the entire personal computer market.

As Digital Research and IBM discovered, you cannot compete directly with Microsoft; they will roll over and crush you. The Mac OS remains viable because it runs on proprietary hardware. Linux is viable primarily because it is free, does not require proprietary hardware, and gives tech types a stable, viable, open source, virtually free alternative to Windows.

Join us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, or read Low End Mac's RSS news feed

Recent Low End PC Articles

Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 12.04 on a 2005 ThinkPad, 2012.07.09. Windows eats up more memory and has more consistent frame rates, while free Ubuntu is less memory hungry and easy to use.
My Experiences with the Lenovo ThinkPad X120e, 2012.06.22. When his 13" MacBook Pro died, Alex Barnes replaced it with a $400 ThinkPad, which he says is no slouch.
Keep Your PC Cool by Replacing Its Thermal Compound, 2012.06.15. Over time, thermal paste dries out and becomes less effective. Replacing it keeps you computer cool, thus increasing its life.
Swapless: Disabling Virtual Memory in Ubuntu, 2012.05.14. A slow hard drive slows virtual memory, and virtual memory can reduce the life of flash memory, so you may want to turn it off.
ThinkPad X41 Revived, 2012.05.09. The ThinkPad X41 converts from a laptop to a tablet. More memory and Compact Flash gave this one a new lease on life.
More in the Low End PC index.

About Low End PC Support Usage Privacy Contact

Entire Low End PC (LEPC) website copyright ©2001-2012 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.
Low End PC is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft, Dell, Lenovo, or any other software or hardware company. Company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.