Low End Mac
Search LEM 
Donate · Amazon.com · MacResQ · Advertise
Other Cobweb sites: Low End Living · Reformed.net
Quicklinks: · Power Macs · 'Books · Early Macs · Week's Best Deals · Best Buys · OS Downloads

Mac Musings

Apple Services: OS X and .mac for One Fair Price

Dan Knight - 2002.08.02

Oliver Thylmann asks the right question on OSNews, "Could Apple go subscription?" Or, better yet, "Should Apple go subscription?"

It's not unlike questions raised here on Low End Mac and elsewhere on the Mac Web, but Thylmann does some number crunching. He makes a good point, as do some respondents to his article.

The Numbers

Apple has 2.5 million OS X users and 2 million iTools users. If all of those OS X users upgrade to Jaguar at $129 and all the iTools users upgrade to .mac at $49 the first year, Apple would pocket a tidy $420 million in one year. Nice.

Of course, not all OS X users will upgrade. Whether this is because they don't hear about Jaguar or can't afford it or don't see the need to is irrelevant. And some OS X users will get reduced cost education and site license pricing, which will also reduce Apple's take. Still, you've got to figure a minimum 1.5 million upgrades at possibly an average price of $79.

The fate of .mac switchers is another story. Surveys on various websites seem to indicate that maybe 15-20% of iTools users will sign up for .mac. Let's call it 300,000 renewals at $49 each.

Between OS X updates and .mac signups, that's maybe $130 million. Not a bad number at all.

The Package

Thylmann suggests that Apple stop selling the Mac OS and switch to selling services - .mac plus OS X upgrades for $120/year. It's an interesting idea, but not quite the right one.

He's right on the money: Apple should be selling services. They're already doing it with .mac and the OS X Maintenance Program. Services will provide Apple with a much steadier stream of income than selling software updates.

Where Thylmann misses the mark is in suggesting that Apple stop selling the Mac OS. That's just wrong, and it's the same kind of thing a lot of businesses are rebelling against with Microsoft's latest upgrade marketing system.

Apple should push services, but the shouldn't stop selling software separately. Give the users a choice, showing once again the Apple thinks differently than Microsoft.

The Price

Costs

What does Apple lose by offering a services package including OS upgrades and .mac for $120 a year? Based on the cost of switching from iTools to .mac and buying Jaguar ($49 + $129 - $120), Apple would be out $58.

But is that number realistic? No, because Apple isn't the only one selling Jaguar - some online dealers are already offering it at $10 off, and Apple has to sell it to them at a low enough price for them to turn a profit. With Apple still refusing to offer any kind of discount for current OS X users to upgrade to 10.2, a lot of people who want to upgrade will be looking at alternatives to buying from the Apple Store. Instead of taking in $129 for each copy of Jaguar, maybe Apple only takes in $90 for each copy sold through distribution. (Maybe more. Maybe less.)

Suddenly Apple's lost profit drops from $58 to maybe $20.

Benefits

It's no great secret that the same retailers will be selling a one-year iTools, er, .mac package for as little as $80 or so, although it looks like Apple will be collecting the $99 per year after the first year.

But let's review the numbers. About 2.5 million current OS X users. About 2 million iTools users. By offering OS X upgrades (to those who already own OS X) and .mac for $120 per year, Apple will probably convert a lot more iTools users and get a lot more Jaguar upgrades. A lot more.

And Apple could offer all sorts of different packages:

  • Apple Services, single user, $120/year
  • additional mac.com email addresses, $10/year
  • additional mac.com web space, varies by amount of space
  • Apple Services, multiple users, $120/year plus $75 per additional computer and .mac user
  • Apple Services, medium site, $700/year for 10 computers and 10 .mac accounts, $70 per additional computer and .mac account
  • Apple Services, large site, $3,000/year for 50 computers and .mac accounts, $60 per additional computer and .mac account
  • Apple Services, huge site, $10,000/year for 200 computers and .mac accounts, $50 per additional computer and .mac account

And I'm sure there'd be even better deals for educational institutions.

The Market

I have no intention of signing up for .mac services. The only thing I ever used was email. I would like to upgrade to Jaguar, but not at $129. Amazon.com 's $79 after rebate offer was very tempting, but it's gone now. Still, the price was right.

My wife is very impressed with iCal, so her business would be a strong candidate for Jaguar - but at $129 times three iBooks, that's a fair bit of change just to coordinate calendars. On top of that, her employees would have to become acclimated to OS X, which hasn't been installed on either of the blue iBooks.

Students, parents, home users, small office users - there's a huge list of Mac users very concerned about value. The cost of .mac is hard to justify, so a lot will be surrendering their mac.com email accounts. And the cost of OS X 10.2 is hard to justify, so a lot will postpone or skip upgrading, fragmenting the OS X market far too early in the development cycle.

By offering a services package for $120 per year, the value equation changes completely. We get our Jaguar for about the same price we'd pay a discounter, we get to upgrade our iTools account to .mac, and we stop griping about how Apple is sticking it to us by taking away our email address or not giving us a price break for upgrading to Jaguar. Apple gets a steady and growing income stream - and keeps most of the OS X users on the same page.

One year. One price. Two system updates mailed on CD-ROM, the rest available by download. $120 would be a fair price. $150 would probably be very attractive. Much higher than that, though, and the value diminishes.

It's a win-win situation. Apple Services.

Apple, are you listening?

Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.

Recent Mac Musings

Links for the Day

  • Mac of the Day: iMac Core2, Sep. 2006 - Apple introduced the biggest screen ever in an iMac with a 24" Core2 Duo model at 2.16 GHz.
  • List of the Day: Old Mac MP covers 604-based multiprocessor Macs and clones.
  • September 6 in LEM history: 99: G4 vs. Pentium III - 00: Setting up a server - 02: Norton Utilities warning - 10 greatest computer annoyances - 06: iMac Core2 Duo - Mac mini Core Duo - The iMac Core2 value equation - 07: Apple seduction - Why I really want an iPod touch - iPod history, 2005 to present - Upgrading a Power Mac G - Apple intros iPod touch, classic, and video nano

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Go to the Mac Musings index.

Channels
 Power Macs
 iMac Channel
 iBook/PowerBook
 MacInSchool
Computer Profiles
 iMac
 Power Mac
 PowerBook/iBook
 Performas
 Mac Clones
 Older Macs
 LisaNeXT
Editorial Archive
Mac Daniel's Advice
Email Lists
LEMchat (uses AIM)
Online Tech Journal
Consumer
 advice, reviews
 guides, deals
Software
Apple History
Best of the Web
 Best of the Mac Web surveys
Miscellaneous Links
 Best Used Mac Buys
 Used Mac Dealers
 Video Cards
 Mac OS X
 Mac Linux
 Macspeak
 RAM Upgrades
About Low End Mac
Site Contacts

Open Link

Support LEM

Affiliates

The Apple Store
.mac
iTunes Store
Club Mac
MacMall
MacResQ
ExperCom
eBay
Amazon.com
PayPal
PCMall
PC Zone
Crucial Memory

Our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For detailed price quotes and advertising information, please contactat BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.