Windows XP Is Faster, but Mac OS X Is Superior in Many Ways
Scott Hansen, an artist and musician in San Francisco, has provided the most honest assessment of the differences between Macs and Windows PCs that I've read, and his conclusions are sure to disappoint some Mac partisans.
Hansen uses Photoshop a lot and has been migrating from Windows XP to Mac OS X. He states right up front that he is "totally in love" with OS X - but there are areas where Windows is better.
The Mac is visually superior, creating a more enjoyable user experience. After using the Mac, Hansen states that he is disappointed every time he goes back to Windows - it's that big a difference. He says, "the beauty and simplicity of the OS X interface is an incredible achievement." And, of course, things tend to "just work" on the Mac, making it a less frustrating user experience.
His second point is that Mac OS X is much more stable than Windows when using Photoshop. He complains that working with Photoshop "in Windows is wrought with errors, bugs, crashes, and lost work." And it's not just one particular machine - this has been his constant experience over the years with Windows XP. By comparison, he says that Photoshop on the Mac has never crashed or misbehaved.
His third point is one some Mac lovers won't like hearing: For raw performance, Windows XP beats Mac OS X. Hansen has run both operating systems on the same hardware, his own optimized Photoshop system with a 4.2 GHz (overclocked) Core 2 Extreme Quad Core CPU, and XP wins every speed comparison. He speculates that this is because OS X has more overhead - more tasks running in the background.
This is something we've discussed here in the past: Every operating system has to make tradeoffs, has to find its own balance point. You can go for maximum speed, maximum ease of use, maximum number of features, maximum interface smoothness, maximum security, etc. But a smooth interface and robust multitasking uses computing power, so you're sacrificing some speed for a better experience. That's the choice the Mac OS has always made by putting the user experience first.
Losing out to Windows in Photoshop is a change from the PowerPC past, when Steve Jobs would compare a Mac with a Windows PC running a huge macro script in Photoshop during his keynote, and the Mac would blow the PC away. Now that we're all using the same Intel Core 2 processors, the overhead of OS X gives Windows XP an advantage in terms of raw computing power applied to the current application. (No word on whether this is still the case with Vista, which most Windows users wish had never been invented. Hansen is coming to OS X from XP, not Vista.)
"the myriad superiorities of the OS X experience far outweigh any performance benefit you might realize within XP."
However, while we have lost bragging rights for Photoshop performance, Hansen notes that "the myriad superiorities of the OS X experience far outweigh any performance benefit you might realize within XP." Those are words Apple should put on billboards.
In the end, Hansen declares it a tie between Windows XP and Mac OS X. Each has strengths and weaknesses. Of course, that's because he's comparing Windows XP with OS X. In Hansen's own words, Vista sucks. He calls it "a complete and utter disaster" and suggests it prefaces Windows' eventual and inevitable decline.
And what is he buying? A MacBook Pro is his choice as his default computer. He's putting his money where it will give him the best computing experience, and that's the Mac platform hands down.
Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.
Recent articles by Dan Knight
- The Late 2012 iMac Value Equation, 2012.10.31. Thinner, lighter, faster, USB 3, improved graphics, Fusion Drive option, and no SuperDrive sum up the new iMacs.
- The 13" Retina MacBook Pro Value Equation, 2012.10.30. Take the 13" MacBook Pro, add a Retina Display, remove the SuperDrive, and drop almost a pound from its weight.
- The Late 2012 Mac mini Value Equation, 2012.10.29. The entry-level Mac mini is a nice step up, but the top-end quad-core model is a powerhouse.
- More in the Mac Musings index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: PowerBook 145, introduced 1992.08.03. About 70% faster than the 140, the 25 MHz 145 was quite a value.
- May 21 in LEM history: 99: Not censorship - 01: USB and FireWire drives - 02: Hooked by a PowerBook - Printer sharing for Mac OS X - 04: Less frequent OS X uprades: Good or bad? - 07: I won't get an iPhone this year - Can 262,144 colors be considered 'millions'? - Most durable 'Book - 3 GB in a Mac mini? - 08: Quadra a great server for vintage Mac network
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- World Book Encyclopedia 2012 DVD, Tommy Thomas, Reviews, 2013.03.05. "You may be asking yourself, in an age of Wikipedia and instant information, is World Book still relevant?"
- Vintage Computer Festival SouthEast, April 20-21, 2013, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.25. Old Apple gear and old PCs.
- iMessage: The Ultimate Messaging Service?, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.21. In most ways, Apple's iMessage is far superior to BlackBerry Messenger.
- More links in our archive.
- Best Mac mini Deals
- Best 13" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Intel iMac Deals
- Best iPod touch Deals
- Best iPhone Deals
- Best iPod nano Deals
- Best iPod classic Deals
- Best Apple TV Prices
- More deals in our archive.
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Mac Driver Museum
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ