No Email Tax
The United Nations has proposed an email tax to subsidize internet connectivity in the two-thirds world. Latest rumor is that the United States government wants to tax email.
From the perspective of the taxman, email has got to look like one incredible revenue opportunity.
But from the perspective of an email user who is already paying internet connection fees, an email tax chills the bones.
Taxing email would be a logistical nightmare. First, you need to determine how you will tax it. Do you charge for each message sent? Or do you charge based on the number of recipients? Either way, do you charge a per piece rate or base it on the size of the message (including attachments)?
It's a sticky business. I'm guessing the government would want to tax email by the number of recipients and by the size of the message (enclosures included). After all, this would maximize income.
But we haven't even come to the hard part yet: how do they measure email to tax it? For instance, should email sent between workers in the same office be taxable? (If it never goes out over the internet, I'd have to say it shouldn't be taxable.)
And who would be responsible for counting messages, recipients, and message size? Would it even be possible to require all mail servers to do this?
Sure, we'd all love to see the spammers go out of business. Even at a fraction of a penny per message, sending thousands or millions of unwanted messages would quickly become costly.
At the same time, free email would become a thing of the past. Who would provide you with free email when they have to pay for each message you send?
Likewise, free email lists would be history. You'd have to pay something to join any moderately busy email list.
Finally, it would completely change the way we use email. Less jokes (okay, maybe not a bad thing). Less quick notes between home and office.
Of course, the government would try to justify taxing email by analogy with snail mail. We've paid postage to have letters delivered for ages; why should email be exempt?
Further, they will argue, the internet was underwritten by the government. We shouldn't be able to use it for free.
But that simply isn't so.
First, because we are paying to use the internet. We pay fees to our internet service provider. These fees, in turn, are used to keep their systems running, to connect their computers to the internet, and to keep the internet growing.
Second, the analogy with snail mail is flawed. No Postal Service employee picks up or delivers email. No Post Office sorts and routes messages to their final destination. No trucks transport bags of email from place to place.
In most cases, we either pay an internet service provider to handle our email, run our own mail server, or find someone to provide us with free email in exchange for seeing some ads.
One way or another, we're paying for the connection to the internet and the hardware that moves the email from one mailbox to another. The internet connection charges we pay are what keeps the internet alive and well.
Although taxing email may strike some as a good idea, the simple fact is that we're already paying fees to use the internet - and implementing an email tax would be a logistical nightmare.
Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.
Recent articles by Dan Knight
- The Late 2012 iMac Value Equation, 2012.10.31. Thinner, lighter, faster, USB 3, improved graphics, Fusion Drive option, and no SuperDrive sum up the new iMacs.
- The 13" Retina MacBook Pro Value Equation, 2012.10.30. Take the 13" MacBook Pro, add a Retina Display, remove the SuperDrive, and drop almost a pound from its weight.
- The Late 2012 Mac mini Value Equation, 2012.10.29. The entry-level Mac mini is a nice step up, but the top-end quad-core model is a powerhouse.
- More in the Mac Musings index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Centris 610, introduced 1993.02.10. This was the Mac we used when we started Low End Mac in 1997.
- May 24 in LEM history: 99: Mac sales up, iMac sales down? - 01: Speeding up digital photography - 02: The Internet, research, and plagiarism - 04: NewerTech TiBook battery - Optical mice from Contour - 06: Power Mac today or Intel tomorrow? - 07: G5: Apple's last fling with PowerPC - G3: From 233 MHz to 1.1 GHz
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- World Book Encyclopedia 2012 DVD, Tommy Thomas, Reviews, 2013.03.05. "You may be asking yourself, in an age of Wikipedia and instant information, is World Book still relevant?"
- Vintage Computer Festival SouthEast, April 20-21, 2013, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.25. Old Apple gear and old PCs.
- iMessage: The Ultimate Messaging Service?, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.21. In most ways, Apple's iMessage is far superior to BlackBerry Messenger.
- More links in our archive.
- Best Mac mini Deals
- Best 13" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Intel iMac Deals
- Best iPod touch Deals
- Best iPhone Deals
- Best iPod nano Deals
- Best iPod classic Deals
- Best Apple TV Prices
- More deals in our archive.
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Mac Driver Museum
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ