Low End Mac Reader Specials

TypeStyler For Mac OS X is Now Shipping! Download The Free Fully Functional 60 Day Tryout at www.typestyler.com

OWC: Get the Right Memory / Ram for your Mac. Top Quality, Competitive Prices, Lifetime Warranty. Expert Support and Video Installation Guidies too! 4.0GB Matched Sets from $87.99, Options up to 32GB. Click here

Poker Mac Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker application such as Full Tilt Poker Mac.

Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.

Compare products like desktop computers, apple laptops, apple macs, and LCD Monitors side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for new mobile phones, sat nav systems, or MP3 players. The Ciao online shopping community makes searching products easy for you.

Mac Musings

Dan Knight - Tip Jar

Letters on Rescuing the Cube

Oct. 6, 2000 - Dan Knight

The response to How to rescue the Cube has been impressive. It seems I'm far from alone in believing Apple could sell a lot more Cubes at lower prices - some have even suggested less costly G3-based Cubes.

Steven Poleske writes:

Hmmm. That has to be the best idea I have seen. At those prices I might even be able to talk the Mrs. in letting me have one.

I hope someone listens.

Thanks. I hope the right someone is listening.

Liam Gray writes:

I just read your story about How to rescue the Cube, and while I think you are on track, I think the best solution might be a high speed G3 rather than a G4. I have Power Mac G4 Cuberead in a few places that IBM has decent yields on G3s running well over 500 MHz, but that Apple hasn't used them for fear of lower end machines running at a higher clock rate than high end machines. Now that there are dual 500 G4s shipping, maybe they could justify a Cube running say a 600 MHz G3, which would be cheaper than a G4, and also produce less heat. Speed would still be good, and pricing could probably be brought down to the $1499 range, possibly with lower speeds available at lower prices. It would still be less than a G4, yet slightly higher than an iMac with slightly better speed to boot. I think that positioning the Cube as a monitorless iMac is a much better idea than the current situation where it really doesn't have a position at all. The G3 still has some life in it, and at this late in it's cycle the cost to performance ratio is pretty good.

Yes, Apple could definitely position a G3-based Cube as a monitor-free iMac. Good suggestion. Are you listening, Steve?

Mick Weeks writes:

I read your article with great interest as I too was thinking of ways of rescuing the Cube. My thinking was along the lines of have a Cube "light" with a fast G3 processor. However, the stumbling block across which I came was how this would affect iMac sales. Pricing a cube with either a G3 or G4 among the various iMac models could prove somewhat tricky as they would offer the same limitations on expandability with the exception of monitor size.

Maybe the iMac could have gone low end with a $599, $799, $999 configuration and left the $1199-$1799 price points to the monitor-less G3/G4 cubes. Just thinking out loud. I enjoy reading your site. Keep up the good work.

The econoCube has several natural markets that don't compete with the iMac:

  • People who want a small, quiet, unobtrusive machine with a flat panel display.
  • People who want an inexpensive, powerful computer to use with a 17" or larger monitor.
  • People who want to set up servers that run headless or share monitor, mouse, and keyboard with a KVM switch.

Apple has missed the boat in these areas. A lot of us would love a new computer, already have a large monitor, and don't want to spend $1,599 and up for a lot more expansion options than we'll ever need.

If anything, cheaper Cubes would destroy the market for the remaining single processor Power Mac G4.

Peter Jackson writes:

My take is that I can see Apple dropping the prices of the current Cubes. The 450 Cube to $1599 and the 500 MHz Cube to $1999.

I believe this price drop may happen in time for Christmas shopping season.

I don't see Apple coming out with any lower MHz Cube model.

I do wish that Apple would come out with a subnotebook for under a $1000. A lot of us just need the features of a Palm, great word processing, email and the Internet.

Thanks for your great article and analysis.

I'd love to see an $1100 Cube also.

I'm personally waiting for a PowerBook with a 1280 x 1024 screen, but that doesn't mean I'd complain if Santa brought one for Christmas.

You're right on target with the subnotebook. Apple is completely missing one of the hottest markets in portable computing.

Ryan Cohen writes,

I read your Cube article. I still think that two other big problems with the Cube are expandability and ergonomics. There are no slots for adding cards, the power supply is a relatively huge brick that dwarfs the Zip 100's "wall wart", and there's no microphone input (I think there's no mic input, I'm not sure).

The Cube's a cool piece of industrial design, but I doubt Apple would offer a cheaper Cube. Such a Cube would step on the iMac's toes a little too much. Apple, right now, is very much a dictatorship, and I'm thinking that Emperor Steve himself sees the Cube on a price/performance level above the iMacs. :-)

For expandability, Apple makes the larger Power Mac G4. The Cube is for people who want an elegant computer, not something to tinker with. As time goes by, I find myself leaning in that direction. There is a huge market filled with people who don't need expansion.

I don't understand your comment on ergonomics. The Cube is no more or less ergonomic than the Power Mac or any other computer-in-a-box. It is, however, very attractive.

Tim Robertson writes:

Since day #1, I have been bemoaning the price of the Cube. And from day #1, I have been saying "Why don't Apple simply drop a 350 MHz G3 chip in it, call it a monitor-less iMac, and sell it for $799?"

They sell the bottom-rung iMac for that price, but this would be even cheaper for Apple as there is no monitor. So the price should be a no brainer.

We both know they won't go for it, though....

Alas, you're probably right. But at least we've suggested it as one way Apple can turn the apparent liability of the Cube into an asset by making more affordable versions. Beyond that, the ball is in Apple's court.

But the question remains, will Apple make the Cube both cool and affordable?

See also A proposal to fix the Cube, Charles W. Moore, Applelinks, 10/5. "...I would even go farther and suggest that Apple use IBM's new 750cx G3e chips in the lower end Cubes...."

<discuss this article on MacSlash>

Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.

Recent Mac Musings

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2009 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
  LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
  Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml.
  Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
  PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.
  Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, iPhone, PowerBook, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.

Custom Search

Amazon.com

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Video Cards
Email Lists

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum
DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ
Abandonware
   Petition
Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
B&H
MacMall
TechRestore
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Advertise

All of our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For price quotes and advertising information, please contact at BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.

Open Link

Problems viewing this page with Internet Explorer 5.5 or 6? It works fine in other browsers, including IE 7. We recommend Firefox for those using Windows, as it is standards based and more secure than IE 6 (and earlier). More LEM visitors use Firefox than any other browser.