Mac Scope

Waiting for a Real Speed Bump

Stephen Van Esch - 2003.02.05

New iMacs and eMacs were released yesterday and were greeted with less than effusive praise. "Yawn," seemed to be the general response, even from the usually zealous Mac press. The real excitement seemed to center around the price drops and improved options instead of the iMac speed bump.

Sure, the 25% speed bump is welcome, and the price drop is a nice thing for buyers, but the whole hardware scene seems to be getting Mac users down. Well, maybe not getting them down, but at least casting a cloud over things. The attitude now is "what have you done for me lately?"

Speed bumps used to be greeted with some sense of excitement. No longer. It appears that speed bumps (and additional processors) aren't indication of real progress. Once upon a time, a speed bump meant things were getting better and better. Now, it seems, a speed bump means that Apple is just covering its behind as Intel's chips keep getting faster.

Anyone remember when the first dual processor machines were introduced? The general reaction seemed to be that Apple was leaning on dual processors to make up for the lack of speed, instead of a party atmosphere.

The longer this drags out, the worst things will get for Apple. If Apple announced a brand new chip that ran at 1.8 GHz tomorrow, what would the reaction be? Yawn again, most likely. 2 GHz? You might get a bit of a reaction. 2.5? Now you're talking!

The point is that Apple will need a substantial increase in processor power to shake things up. While users may have once been satisfied with a 100 MHz jump every once in a while, Apple has fallen so far behind that only a substantial increase in power will make us sit up and take notice.

Many people have speculated that customers are holding off on upgrading their machines until they see a significant speed increase. How much of a speed increase will be required before people start putting down their hard earned money? I'm certain that a 200 MHz increase won't do it. 500? That might be worth it.

The next generation Apple chip (whether from Motorola, IBM, AMD, or Intel) had better blow the doors off the current crop. Otherwise, most people will likely just keep plugging away with their old Macs. It's not really that much slower, now is it?

Just about the only upside is that Apple may benefit if it delivers the goods. There's likely quite a bit of pent up demand for faster machines right now, and Apple can probably expect a serious run on its next generation chip.

Join us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Google+, or subscribe to our RSS news feed

Stephen Van Esch is the founder and president of the E-learning Foundry, an online training resource for Mac users. Steve loves the Mac and is doubly bilingual, since he's also fluent in Windows and French.

Links for the Day

Recent Content

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Custom Search

Follow Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac on Facebook

Favorite Sites

Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Deal Brothers
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ

The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
Macgo Blu-ray Player
Parallels Desktop for Mac

Low End Mac's store


Open Link