Low End Mac's Online Tech Journal

EIDE vs. SCSI

Scott L. Barber

Scott L. Barber first posted this to Quadlist. It is reprinted with his permission.

Quantum makes the best SCSI drives for Apple or clone branded equipment. I think they make lousy IDE drives though, and vote for IBM or Maxtor when it comes to IDE. When I've had the privilege of working on Adaptec SCSI cards in IBM/Intel/Linux boxes, I've always gone with Seagate SCSI, instead of Quantum, because the Adaptec cards are smart enough to handle the Seagate properly. When dealing with IBM/Intel/Linux boxes with internal IDE drives, my favorite is Western Digital Caviar - while I have been known to carry a few Seagate IDE drives around as well.

So I'll turn to the Perot graph. . . .

Apple, SCSI Quantum - no substitute for total compatibility
Apple, IDE IBM, Maxtor - Seagates have a lot of problems with Apple's IDE controller
Intel, SCSI Seagate - because when you have a card as smart as Adaptec, the bottom of the barrel will do.
Intel, IDE Western Digital - low power, noisy, but reliable - -Or Seagate, who makes a decent IDE drive.

You might think it strange that my preferences don't cross platforms properly, but I have reasons for all of them. I do have some real losers when it comes to hard drives though - I don't like IBM SCSI drives - they suck - they don't work with most Apple's and are too anal to configure. Micropolis made a wonderful drive; unfortunately they're out of business, and you could only sell them to me (in their 9GB configuration) for about $100 apiece. I like warranties, because about 1 out of every 10 drives die a miserable death after just a few months.

APS has long been one of the best for cables of all kinds, especially SCSI cables and test gear, as well as for hard drive brackets, external housings, etc. If you want to extend your '040 system's life with internal or external hard drives, internal cooling fans, CD drives, all kinds of peripherals, etc., check them out at www.apstech.com/. I don't have any financial interest in the company. I just really appreciate the way they have handled my questions and orders in the past --and I feel a little bad that they suffered from Jobs' clone decision.

I loved APS - but didn't purchase from them much, because I found I could piece together the same parts for much less price. Of course, that's me. I would purchase DAT units and external devices from them, when the need arose. I especially purchased their parts when dealing with high end servers, with large external devices or CD-Jukeboxes, with 24/7 tape backup units. APS was reliable, and dependable, and I rarely had to service the equipment again simply because they built boxes out of the same equipment that I did. When I didn't want to build a crappy looking machine, but needed something presentable (not shoved in a closet or a cabinet as a hidden server), I purchased APS equipment - in that case, APS was cheap. LEM

Scott L. Barber <serker@earthling.net>
Pres/CEO, SERKER Worldwide, Inc.
Providing Hardware/Networking/Telecomm for 13 years

Quadlist, the listserv for users of 68040-based Macs. FAQ at <http://lowendmac.com/lists/quadlist.shtml>

Join us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, use our Google+ page, or read our RSS news feed

Recent Online Tech Journal Columns

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Custom Search

FollowLow End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Macon Facebook

Low End Mac Reader Specials

Quantcast

Quantcast

Quantcast

Quantcast

Quantcast

Quantcast

Quantcast

Quantcast

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac Museum
Deal Brothers
DealMac
Mac2Sell
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ

Affiliates

Amazon.com
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
Macgo Blu-ray Player
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay

Advertise

Open Link