Mac Plus with Brainstorm
The Plus came with an 8 MHz 68000 CPU; the Brainstorm upgrade replaces that with a low power 16 MHz 68000. Brainstorm had the guts to claim it could more than double performance. Some claims just beg to be tested.
I had the Brainstorm upgrade installed in my Mac Plus about nine years ago, sold the system a few years later, and recently reacquired it. (See My Mac Plus for all the details.) After all these years, I could finally test Brainstorm's claims.
Drive is a 160 MB Quantum, the same one I used when benchmarking a regular Mac Plus. Both computers have 4 MB of memory and were tested with the same System 7.5.5 configuration.
Remember that benchmarks are arbitrary. They measure certain types of performance that may or may not reflect the way you work.
The system was tested on 8 October 2000 using System 7.5.5. Results are relative to a Mac Classic, which rates 1.0. Numbers rounded off to two decimal places.
The first set of numbers compares performance at different cache settings.
Stock Plus cache CPU graphics disk math 32KB 0.87 0.91 0.67 0.99 64KB 0.87 0.91 0.67 0.99 128KB 0.87 0.91 0.67 0.99 256KB 0.87 0.91 0.57 0.99 Plus with Brainstorm cache CPU graphics disk math 32KB 2.02 1.96 1.27 2.18 64KB 2.03 1.96 1.27 2.18 128KB 2.03 1.96 1.27 2.18 256KB 2.03 1.96 1.15 2.18 Brainstorm Performance cache CPU graphics disk math 32KB 233% 215% 188% 220% 64KB 233% 214% 189% 220% 128KB 233% 214% 189% 220% 256KB 233% 214% 203% 220%
The cache setting should have little influence on non-disk tests, which these numbers bear out. With this particular setup, cache size makes no appreciable difference except at 256KB, where it actually reduces performance on both the stock Plus and the accelerated one - although is slows the faster Plus less.
These benchmarks bear out Brainstorm's claims: the upgrade does make the Mac Plus over twice as fast. It even improves SCSI throughput.
Having just completed benchmarks on the stock Plus and the Brainstorm ugpraded one, I can also say there's a huge subjective difference between the two. The basic Plus just feels slow and tired; the Brainstorm makes it a much perkier machine.
Is a Mac Plus with a Brainstorm accelerator as fast as a 16 MHz 68030-based SE/30? Not hardly. The SE/30 scores over twice as high on the CPU test, nearly twice as high on the graphics and disk tests (using the same hard drive), and about triple on the math tests.
Still, nine years ago I thought Brainstorm was an excellent value for $200. Today, I wouldn't want to run a Plus without it.
Speedometer 4 doesn't run on 68000-based Macs.
Go to the Plus profile.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: PowerBook 145, introduced 1992.08.03. About 70% faster than the 140, the 25 MHz 145 was quite a value.
- Support Low End Mac
- World Book Encyclopedia 2012 DVD, Tommy Thomas, Reviews, 2013.03.05. "You may be asking yourself, in an age of Wikipedia and instant information, is World Book still relevant?"
- Vintage Computer Festival SouthEast, April 20-21, 2013, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.25. Old Apple gear and old PCs.
- iMessage: The Ultimate Messaging Service?, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.21. In most ways, Apple's iMessage is far superior to BlackBerry Messenger.
- More links in our archive.
- Best Mac mini Deals
- Best 13" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Intel iMac Deals
- Best iPod touch Deals
- Best iPhone Deals
- Best iPod nano Deals
- Best iPod classic Deals
- Best Apple TV Prices
- More deals in our archive.
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Mac Driver Museum
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ