Low End Mac Reader Specials

TypeStyler For Mac OS X is Now Shipping! Download The Free Fully Functional 60 Day Tryout at www.typestyler.com

OWC: Get the Right Memory / Ram for your Mac. Top Quality, Competitive Prices, Lifetime Warranty. Expert Support and Video Installation Guidies too! 4.0GB Matched Sets from $87.99, Options up to 32GB. Click here

Poker Mac Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker application such as Full Tilt Poker Mac.

Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.

Compare products like desktop computers, apple laptops, apple macs, and LCD Monitors side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for new mobile phones, sat nav systems, or MP3 players. The Ciao online shopping community makes searching products easy for you.

Mac Spectrum

Does Using Matched RAM Make Your Mac Faster or More Stable?

- 2009.04.28 - Tip Jar

Follow Simon Royal on Twitter.

Popularity: LEMLEMLEMLEM

Tweet this article. Short link: http://bit.ly/NiLpr

Is it important to used matched memory?

This question has bugged me for a while. When cramming as much memory in a Mac as you can, should you use the same size sticks and the same brand to ensure maximum compatibility and stability?

Most Macs don't need matched sizes, apart from some of the dual processor Power Macs, so you can put in any size with each other. I have had some Blue & White G3 Power Macs with 128 MB sticks and 512 MB sticks together, and they worked fine. But what about same brand sticks?

The trouble is, as my Mac expeditions are done on such a tight budget, I usually grab RAM where I can, so I have never had a chance to put it to the test. When testing these things out, it is always better to use the same hardware so you get an exact comparison.

Matched memory modules
A pair of matched 512 MB modules from First Choice.

I recently obtained three more 512 MB sticks of PC133 144-pin Mac laptop RAM. Coupled with the existing 512 MB stick in my 867 MHz PowerBook, I now have enough to max both my 867 MHz and my 400 MHz PowerBook G4 to their 1 GB limits.

I first removed the 256 MB module in my 867 MHz PowerBook and popped in a second 512 MB stick. Both sticks were different brands, and I benchmarked the machine.

Xbench gave a result of 26.43 and Geekbench gave a result of 519.

Then I took both sticks out and put in two 512 MB sticks that were the same brand. For the record, they were made by First Choice Memory. I ran the benchmark tests again.

Xbench gave a result of 27.50 and Geekbench gave a result of 523.

A slight improvement. Xbench gave a 4% increase - which is quite a lot considering it is the same amount of RAM as before. Geekbench, however, only gave a 0.8% increase. But you have to bear in mind both programs use different methods of benchmarking.

Is it worth it to have matched memory? That depends on the financial cost of a matched pair against an unmatched pair.

In older machines, we tend to do everything possible to increase their potential. My machine is hardly stock. It has a faster 5400 RPM hard drive in it, I upgraded recently from 768 MB of RAM to 1 GB and then replaced that with 1 GB of matched RAM, all to slightly increase system performance.

There is a minimal increase in performance, enough to raise an eyebrow, so if buying matched RAM is drastically more expensive than buying unmatched RAM, I would have serious reservations.

Whether it increases system stability is another matter. My machine was rock solid before I switched to matched RAM, so it will be hard to tell if there is any improvement in that area. I bought some extra RAM cheaply, and it just happened to be a matched pair.

If you can get matched RAM without a price premium, do it. It helps performance a bit, but from my experience unmatched RAM offers just as much stability. LEM

Recent Columns by Simon Royal

Royal also has his own Mac specific website.

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2009 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
  LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
  Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml.
  Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
  PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.
  Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, iPhone, PowerBook, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.

Custom Search

Amazon.com

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Video Cards
Email Lists

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum
DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ
Abandonware
   Petition
Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
B&H
MacMall
TechRestore
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Advertise

All of our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For price quotes and advertising information, please contact at BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.

Open Link

Problems viewing this page with Internet Explorer 5.5 or 6? It works fine in other browsers, including IE 7. We recommend Firefox for those using Windows, as it is standards based and more secure than IE 6 (and earlier). More LEM visitors use Firefox than any other browser.