Mac Spectrum
Does Using Matched RAM Make Your Mac Faster or More Stable?
- 2009.04.28 - Tip Jar
Follow Simon Royal on Twitter.
Popularity: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Short link: http://bit.ly/NiLpr
Is it important to used matched memory?
This question has bugged me for a while. When cramming as much memory in a Mac as you can, should you use the same size sticks and the same brand to ensure maximum compatibility and stability?
Most Macs don't need matched sizes, apart from some of the dual processor Power Macs, so you can put in any size with each other. I have had some Blue & White G3 Power Macs with 128 MB sticks and 512 MB sticks together, and they worked fine. But what about same brand sticks?
The trouble is, as my Mac expeditions are done on such a tight budget, I usually grab RAM where I can, so I have never had a chance to put it to the test. When testing these things out, it is always better to use the same hardware so you get an exact comparison.

A pair of matched 512 MB modules from First Choice.
I recently obtained three more 512 MB sticks of PC133 144-pin Mac laptop RAM. Coupled with the existing 512 MB stick in my 867 MHz PowerBook, I now have enough to max both my 867 MHz and my 400 MHz PowerBook G4 to their 1 GB limits.
I first removed the 256 MB module in my 867 MHz PowerBook and popped in a second 512 MB stick. Both sticks were different brands, and I benchmarked the machine.
Xbench gave a result of 26.43 and Geekbench gave a result of 519.
Then I took both sticks out and put in two 512 MB sticks that were the same brand. For the record, they were made by First Choice Memory. I ran the benchmark tests again.
Xbench gave a result of 27.50 and Geekbench gave a result of 523.
A slight improvement. Xbench gave a 4% increase - which is quite a lot considering it is the same amount of RAM as before. Geekbench, however, only gave a 0.8% increase. But you have to bear in mind both programs use different methods of benchmarking.
Is it worth it to have matched memory? That depends on the financial cost of a matched pair against an unmatched pair.
In older machines, we tend to do everything possible to increase their potential. My machine is hardly stock. It has a faster 5400 RPM hard drive in it, I upgraded recently from 768 MB of RAM to 1 GB and then replaced that with 1 GB of matched RAM, all to slightly increase system performance.
There is a minimal increase in performance, enough to raise an eyebrow, so if buying matched RAM is drastically more expensive than buying unmatched RAM, I would have serious reservations.
Whether it increases system stability is another matter. My machine was rock solid before I switched to matched RAM, so it will be hard to tell if there is any improvement in that area. I bought some extra RAM cheaply, and it just happened to be a matched pair.
If you can get matched RAM without a price premium, do it. It helps
performance a bit, but from my experience unmatched RAM offers just as
much stability.
Join us on Facebook!, follow us on Twitter, use our Google+ page, or read our RSS news feed
Recent articles by Simon Royal
- Apple May No Longer Support Your Older Mac, but Microsoft Will, 2012.05.11. Believe it or not, Windows 7 and 8 can run nicely on Macs than can't run OS X 10.7 or 10.8 at all.
- 1998: The iMac Saves Apple, 2012.05.04. Its specs were pedestrian, but the color, lack of standard Mac ports, and missing floppy drew a lot of attention.
- Apple Should Make Older Mac OS Versions Free, 2012.05.03. It can cost more for a copy of the Mac OS than you paid for an old Mac you want to put it on.
- More in the Mac Spectrum index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Lisa, introduced 1983.01.19. The ancestor of the Macintosh had a mouse, a graphical interface, and a $10,000 price tag.
- May 21 in LEM history: 99: Not censorship - 01: USB and FireWire drives - 02: Hooked by a PowerBook - Printer sharing for Mac OS X - 04: Less frequent OS X uprades: Good or bad? - 07: I won't get an iPhone this year - Can 262,144 colors be considered 'millions'? - Most durable 'Book - 3 GB in a Mac mini? - 08: Quadra a great server for vintage Mac network
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- Flashback Removal Update for OS X 10.5 Leopard, Dropbox Pick of the Cloud Litter, and More, Mac News Review, 2012.05.18. Also Kodak Hero supports wireless printing from anywhere, WinOnX lets you run Windows apps on Macs, and free Mac Malware Remover.
- The MacBook Legacy: 2006 to 2011, Dan Knight, Mac Musings, 2012.05.16. Apple's original consumer Intel-based notebook, the MacBook filled an important niche until it was phased out in 2011.
- 17" MacBook Pro on the Way Out or Changing with the Times?, Dan Bashur, Apple, Tech, and Gaming, 2012.05.15. No other MacBook rivals its expansion options, but is that enough reason for Apple to keep the largest MacBook Pro around?
- More links in our archive.
Recent Deals
- Best Classic Mac OS Deals
- Best iBook G4 Deals
- Best 15" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Mac Pro Deals
- Best 15" PowerBook G4 Deals
- Best 17" PowerBook G4 Deals
- Best MacBook Deals
- Best iPod shuffle Deals
- More deals in our archive.
About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact
Follow
Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac
on Facebook
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Macsales.com for the Right Mac Memory. Most Popular: 16GB from $128; 8GB from $50. MacBook Pro & Mac mini Kits up to 16GB. iMac up to 32GB & Mac Pro now up to 128GB. - Macsales.com
Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Macpokeronline.com will show you how to download and play Poker on a Mac natively on your Mac in just minutes.
Favorite Sites
MacSurfer
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac Museum
Deal Brothers
DealMac
Mac2Sell
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ
Affiliates
Amazon.com
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay

