Is More RAM More Important than Matched RAM in the MacBook?
Ever since Apple released the first MacBook one year ago, the company has sold the MacBook with matched pairs of memory, recommended that users only upgrade with matched pairs, and stated that the MacBook has a 2 GB memory ceiling.
Other World Computing, a longtime supporter of Macs and a company that likes to push the envelope, decided to test that with both an original MacBook and the later Core 2 version by installing matched pairs and unmatched sets of RAM and running several benchmark tests.
They tested the original MacBook in seven configurations and the Core 2 version in eight (the earlier Core Duo doesn't support more than 2 GB). This included testing at 512 MB, 1 GB, and 2 GB with matched pairs - and at 768 MB, 1 GB, 1.25 GB, 1.5 GB, 2 GB, and 3 GB with unmatched RAM.
That's a total of 15 configurations tested with six different benchmarks. It's a lot of data to digest, and OWC reports raw benchmark numbers. We're going to translate that to percentage improvements.
Regardless of the configuration, benchmark results for the original MacBook were within 1% of the base 512 MB score. The highest score, achieved with a pair of 1 GB modules, was an imperceptible 1.6% better than the lowest score, which came from mixing a 256 MB module an a 1 GB one.
We see a broader range of results with the newer Core 2 MacBook. Here the 2 GB results are 3.3% better than the 1.25 GB results. However, the 3 GB results are even better - 3.9% better than 2 GB, 5.2% better than 1 GB (matched), and 5.8% better than 512 MB (matched).
Comparing the 1 GB matched and unmatched scores, there's only 0.6% difference between them. Again, the lowest score is achieved with the 1.25 GB configuration. It seems that the greater the difference in capacity between two unmatched modules, the greater the performance hit.
In this case, except for the 1.25 GB configuration, more RAM yields more performance whether RAM is matched or not.
Cinebench tests 3D modeling, and in this case the best results were achieved with matched pairs of memory in both the Core Duo MacBook and the later Core 2 model. In fact, you had to put 1.5 GB in the original MacBook to match the base 512 MB matched score - and that was well behind the 1 GB matched score.
The best point of comparison is at 1 GB, where the Core Duo MacBook scored 9.1% higher with a matched pair, and the Core 2 model has an 8.8% better score. The highest score was achieved with 2 GB of RAM, and the 3 GB configuration in the Core 2 MacBook was 4.6% below that. Even the match 1 GB configuration scored higher.
For this kind of work, matched pairs are a real benefit.
The Photoshop benchmark uses the older Photoshop CS, so it uses the Rosetta translation program to convert PowerPC code into something the MacBook's Intel CPU understands. Rosetta is very memory hungry.
As with XBench, the trend is that more RAM means a better score. Going from 512 MB to 768 MB cut 45% from the benchmark score with the original MacBook - and just over 50% with the Core 2 MacBook! Differences between 1 GB matched and unmatched scores are negligible (under 2%), and the best results trim an impressive 50% from the 512 MB benchmark score with 2 GB of RAM in the Core Duo model, while 3 GB of RAM in the Core 2 MacBook reduced the score by 54.5%.
Adobe After Effect also runs under Rosetta, and the maximum RAM configuration provides the best result for both MacBooks. The year old MacBook sees a 9.6% improvement vs. 512 MB, while the November MacBook is 9% faster with 3 GB.
Results are less predictable with After Effects than with the other programs, so we can't generalize about unmatched pairs being better or worse than matched pairs of RAM. We'll call this one a draw.
This benchmark runs the iTunes v=isualizer while concurrently running the Photoshop benchmark. This taxes the CPU, memory, and the video card. Again, there's a huge performance improvement (43% on the Core Duo and the Core 2) simply by moving from 512 MB matched to 768 MB unmatched. Curiously, the best Core Duo result is achieved at 1.5 GB unmatched, while the best Core 2 results is at 2 GB matched.
Looking at the 1 GB results, matched memory is 3.3% faster in the original MacBook, 1.4% faster with the Core Duo model. Overall, we'll call this a draw.
This is the one gamers will be most interested in, and the tests are run with the Intel-native version of Halo. We can expect to see the greatest difference here, as the GPU is the part of the MacBook that benefits most from matched RAM.
Most importantly, these frame rates are going to be considered unacceptable by most gamers, as they range from 12.4 to 14.3 frames per second. On the Core Duo MacBook, the 2 GB score is just 2.1% better than the 512 MB score, and on the Core 2 version, the frame rate is barely 3% higher.
Results with unmatched memory are worse across the board than comparable amounts of matched RAM. At the 1 GB level, the Core Duo MacBook has a 4.2% higher frame rate with matched RAM, and the newer Core 2 model sees an even more impressive 6.1% difference.
For gaming, matched pairs will provide the best performance.
Hats off to OWC for doing all of this work and publishing the full results on their website. It really helps us understand where more RAM is more important than matched modules - and vice versa.
Of the six benchmarks, After Effects and Stress Test are a draw. Of the remaining four, more RAM is more important than matched RAM in XBench and Photoshop. Matched RAM only seems to make a significant difference for Cinebench and gaming - and if that's what you want to do, the MacBook simply isn't the ideal platform.
We have to agree 100% with OWC when they conclude, "More memory is overall better than having less memory that is interleaved. There is a huge benefit to upgrading even just to 768 MB (replacing a one of the 256 MB with a 512 MB) from a factory 512 MB config."
Thankfully Apple finally recognized that 512 MB of RAM really is inadequate today, and the latest version of the MacBook ships with 1 GB of RAM (two matched 512 MB modules).
Whatever you current configuration, don't be afraid to mix rather than match RAM modules when upgrading your MacBook. Outside of gaming, more RAM will give you better performance whether it's matched or not.
Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.
Recent articles by Dan Knight
- The Late 2012 iMac Value Equation, 2012.10.31. Thinner, lighter, faster, USB 3, improved graphics, Fusion Drive option, and no SuperDrive sum up the new iMacs.
- The 13" Retina MacBook Pro Value Equation, 2012.10.30. Take the 13" MacBook Pro, add a Retina Display, remove the SuperDrive, and drop almost a pound from its weight.
- The Late 2012 Mac mini Value Equation, 2012.10.29. The entry-level Mac mini is a nice step up, but the top-end quad-core model is a powerhouse.
- More in the Mac Musings index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Power Mac 7500, introduced 1995.08.08. This workhorse introduced a new desktop case and CPU daughter cards.
- June 19 in LEM history: 00: Mac software not 'as pathetic as it could be' - 01: Hate Windows? Get a Mac - Little payments, big business - 02: Undoing years of Mac evangelism? - 03: Back on the low-end TiBook - 06: Pimping my PowerBook G4 - 07: Safari for Windows not a slam dunk success - 08: What about the iPod touch? - Falling for the Sony Alpha α200
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- World Book Encyclopedia 2012 DVD, Tommy Thomas, Reviews, 2013.03.05. "You may be asking yourself, in an age of Wikipedia and instant information, is World Book still relevant?"
- Vintage Computer Festival SouthEast, April 20-21, 2013, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.25. Old Apple gear and old PCs.
- iMessage: The Ultimate Messaging Service?, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.21. In most ways, Apple's iMessage is far superior to BlackBerry Messenger.
- More links in our archive.
- Best Mac mini Deals
- Best 13" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Intel iMac Deals
- Best iPod touch Deals
- Best iPhone Deals
- Best iPod nano Deals
- Best iPod classic Deals
- Best Apple TV Prices
- More deals in our archive.
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Mac Driver Museum
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ