Low End Mac Reader Specials
Memory To Go Special: MacPro 8 Core 8GB kit $232 / 4GB kit $116 / 2GB kit $72. New Macbook 2GB DDR3-$65. HARD DRIVES available -- Free shipping / LIfetime warranty.
Download Typestyler, still the Ultimate Styling Tool for Internet, Print and Video Graphics. Works great in Classic with a Native OS X Version on the way. Free Tryout: www.typestyler.com
LA Computer Company: Specials on AppleCare, iMac's, Apple Batteries and Apple A/C Adapters. Also Great prices on Used Apple Computers. Call 1-800-941-7654 Click Here.
Mac users can finally play Party Poker for Mac. Not only that, they can also learn how to play PokerStars for Mac.
Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.
Compare products like desktop computers, laptops, and LCD TVs side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for a new cell phone GPS products or MP3 players. The Ciao network makes searching products easy for you.
Mac Musings
Is More RAM More Important than Matched RAM in the MacBook?
Dan Knight - 2007.05.25 - Tip Jar
Ever since Apple released the first MacBook one year ago, the company has sold the MacBook with matched pairs of memory, recommended that users only upgrade with matched pairs, and stated that the MacBook has a 2 GB memory ceiling.
Other World Computing, a longtime supporter of Macs and a company that likes to push the envelope, decided to test that with both an original MacBook and the later Core 2 version by installing matched pairs and unmatched sets of RAM and running several benchmark tests.
They tested the original MacBook in seven configurations and the Core 2 version in eight (the earlier Core Duo doesn't support more than 2 GB). This included testing at 512 MB, 1 GB, and 2 GB with matched pairs - and at 768 MB, 1 GB, 1.25 GB, 1.5 GB, 2 GB, and 3 GB with unmatched RAM.
That's a total of 15 configurations tested with six different benchmarks. It's a lot of data to digest, and OWC reports raw benchmark numbers. We're going to translate that to percentage improvements.
XBench
Regardless of the configuration, benchmark results for the original MacBook were within 1% of the base 512 MB score. The highest score, achieved with a pair of 1 GB modules, was an imperceptible 1.6% better than the lowest score, which came from mixing a 256 MB module an a 1 GB one.
We see a broader range of results with the newer Core 2 MacBook. Here the 2 GB results are 3.3% better than the 1.25 GB results. However, the 3 GB results are even better - 3.9% better than 2 GB, 5.2% better than 1 GB (matched), and 5.8% better than 512 MB (matched).
Comparing the 1 GB matched and unmatched scores, there's only 0.6% difference between them. Again, the lowest score is achieved with the 1.25 GB configuration. It seems that the greater the difference in capacity between two unmatched modules, the greater the performance hit.
In this case, except for the 1.25 GB configuration, more RAM yields more performance whether RAM is matched or not.
Cinebench
Cinebench tests 3D modeling, and in this case the best results were achieved with matched pairs of memory in both the Core Duo MacBook and the later Core 2 model. In fact, you had to put 1.5 GB in the original MacBook to match the base 512 MB matched score - and that was well behind the 1 GB matched score.
The best point of comparison is at 1 GB, where the Core Duo MacBook scored 9.1% higher with a matched pair, and the Core 2 model has an 8.8% better score. The highest score was achieved with 2 GB of RAM, and the 3 GB configuration in the Core 2 MacBook was 4.6% below that. Even the match 1 GB configuration scored higher.
For this kind of work, matched pairs are a real benefit.
Photoshop
The Photoshop benchmark uses the older Photoshop CS, so it uses the Rosetta translation program to convert PowerPC code into something the MacBook's Intel CPU understands. Rosetta is very memory hungry.
As with XBench, the trend is that more RAM means a better score. Going from 512 MB to 768 MB cut 45% from the benchmark score with the original MacBook - and just over 50% with the Core 2 MacBook! Differences between 1 GB matched and unmatched scores are negligible (under 2%), and the best results trim an impressive 50% from the 512 MB benchmark score with 2 GB of RAM in the Core Duo model, while 3 GB of RAM in the Core 2 MacBook reduced the score by 54.5%.
After Effects
Adobe After Effect also runs under Rosetta, and the maximum RAM configuration provides the best result for both MacBooks. The year old MacBook sees a 9.6% improvement vs. 512 MB, while the November MacBook is 9% faster with 3 GB.
Results are less predictable with After Effects than with the other programs, so we can't generalize about unmatched pairs being better or worse than matched pairs of RAM. We'll call this one a draw.
'Stress Test'
This benchmark runs the iTunes v=isualizer while concurrently running the Photoshop benchmark. This taxes the CPU, memory, and the video card. Again, there's a huge performance improvement (43% on the Core Duo and the Core 2) simply by moving from 512 MB matched to 768 MB unmatched. Curiously, the best Core Duo result is achieved at 1.5 GB unmatched, while the best Core 2 results is at 2 GB matched.
Looking at the 1 GB results, matched memory is 3.3% faster in the original MacBook, 1.4% faster with the Core Duo model. Overall, we'll call this a draw.
Halo
This is the one gamers will be most interested in, and the tests are run with the Intel-native version of Halo. We can expect to see the greatest difference here, as the GPU is the part of the MacBook that benefits most from matched RAM.
Most importantly, these frame rates are going to be considered unacceptable by most gamers, as they range from 12.4 to 14.3 frames per second. On the Core Duo MacBook, the 2 GB score is just 2.1% better than the 512 MB score, and on the Core 2 version, the frame rate is barely 3% higher.
Results with unmatched memory are worse across the board than comparable amounts of matched RAM. At the 1 GB level, the Core Duo MacBook has a 4.2% higher frame rate with matched RAM, and the newer Core 2 model sees an even more impressive 6.1% difference.
For gaming, matched pairs will provide the best performance.
Final Results
Hats off to OWC for doing all of this work and publishing the full results on their website. It really helps us understand where more RAM is more important than matched modules - and vice versa.
Of the six benchmarks, After Effects and Stress Test are a draw. Of the remaining four, more RAM is more important than matched RAM in XBench and Photoshop. Matched RAM only seems to make a significant difference for Cinebench and gaming - and if that's what you want to do, the MacBook simply isn't the ideal platform.
We have to agree 100% with OWC when they conclude, "More memory is overall better than having less memory that is interleaved. There is a huge benefit to upgrading even just to 768 MB (replacing a one of the 256 MB with a 512 MB) from a factory 512 MB config."
Thankfully Apple finally recognized that 512 MB of RAM really is inadequate today, and the latest version of the MacBook ships with 1 GB of RAM (two matched 512 MB modules).
Whatever you current configuration, don't be afraid to mix rather
than match RAM modules when upgrading your MacBook. Outside of gaming,
more RAM will give you better performance whether it's matched or not.
Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.
Recent Mac Musings
- Our Debt to the IBM PC, 01.09. A Mac user looks at the legacy of the IBM PC.
- Surprise, Average Broadband Throughput Is Lower than Maximum Throughput, 01.08. If a service is advertised as 8 Mbps maximum, it shouldn't surprise anyone that the average speed is below that number.
- The Lisa Legacy, 01.08. We should always remember how Apple's innovation paved the way for all future computers.
- The 17" Unibody MacBook Pro Value Equation, 01.07. The new model is a bit faster, a bit smaller, a bit lighter, and has an incredible 8-hour battery life.
- More in the Mac Musings index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: 15" 'TiBook' PowerBook G4, Jan. 2001 - A new 1" thin PowerBook design with a titanium case, 15" widescreen display.
- Group of the Day: PowerList for those using Power Computing Mac clones.
- January 9 in LEM history: 01: Macworld keynote - 02: The new iMac - Redefining Apple's market - 03: Safari shows off the Apple difference - Impressions of Safari beta - 04: The colored iPod mini - 06: Installing 'Tiger' on unsupported Macs - Time to replace 5-year-old PowerBook - 07: iPhone and Apple TV - Axiotron Modbook - Mac vs. PC price comparisons are never fair - Backup to the rescue - 08: 2008 Mac Pro value equation
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- BYO $240 Hackintosh, HyperCard Resurrection, USB 3.0 10x as Fast, SlimBlade Trackball, and More, Mac News Review, 01.09. Also the brilliance of the Macworld keynote, businesses embracing Macs, Picasa for Mac available, Toast Titanium 10 ships, and more.
- Hooked on Classic Macs, Tommy Thomas, Welcome to Macintosh, 01.09. Tommy Thomas is back with a renewed focus on Macs that can run the 'classic' Mac OS.
- Software Should Come with a Fresh Date, Frank Fox, Stop the Noiz, 01.09. Sooner or later, some hardware or OS update will probably break a program you own. Software vendors should be up front about how long they'll support it.
- Thanks for the IBM PC, Dad, L. Victor Marks, My First Mac, 01.09. Dad, thanks for bringing home that first IBM PC way back in 1981.
- What a Legacy: The Origin of the IBM PC, Tom Hormby, Orchard, 01.09. IBM introduced its PC on August 12, 1981, shaking up the entire personal computer industry. Today even Apple makes its computers IBM compatible.
- Heat Management for 'Books and the Last Mac to Run OS 9.1, Phil Herlihy, The Usefulness Equation, 01.08. Tips on keeping a first-gen MacBook Air from throttling back with CoolBook, using G4FanControl with a G4 PowerBook, and the fastest Mac that can boot Mac OS 9.1.
- A History of Apple's Lisa, 1979-1986, Tom Hormby, Orchard, 01.08. Originally envisioned as a business computer to replace the Apple II, the Lisa brought the mouse and GUI to the computer market - only to be felled by the less costly Macintosh.
- Lisa's DNA Is All Over Modern Computing, Ray Arachelian, Apple Seeds, 01.08. Those who label Apple's Lisa a failure are ignoring the computer's legacy that shows up in every personal computer sold today.
- The Innovative Lisa, Dan Knight, Online Tech Journal, 01.08. Apple's Lisa and how it paved the way for the Macintosh.
- Waterfield First with SleeveCase for New 17" Unibody MacBook Pro, Charles W. Moore, 'Book Value, 01.08. Waterfield has a reputation for top quality bags at appropriate prices, and it's already designed a sleeve for the new 17" Unibody MacBook Pro.
- Blackouts and Web Access, Death of a Kanga, the Future of PowerPC Macs, and More, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 01.07. Also another email client suggestion and whether a G3 iMac can handle a 7200 rpm hard drive without overheating.
- How Netbooks Impact Microsoft and Apple, Tim Nash, Taking Back the Market, 01.07. Netbooks are keeping Windows XP alive, which may slow adoption of Windows 7, and perceived value keeps the Mac market share growing at the expense of Windows.
- The Ill-Fated Apple III, Jason Walsh, Apple Before the Mac, 01.07. "...not only was the Apple III mind crunchingly expensive, it was made with none of the passion of the Apple II or Macintosh."
- 2 Apple Failures: Apple III and Lisa, Tom Hormby, Orchard, 01.07. Apple's two not-so-great product lines between the Apple II line and the Macintosh.
- Apple III Chaos: Apple's First Failure, Joshua Coventry, Cortland, 01.07. Apple had known nothing but success with its Apple II product line, but when it tried to enter the business world with the Apple III, the learned the cost of failure.
- More links in our archive.
Recent Deals
- Best MacBook Deals, 01.09. Used 1.83 GHz, $595; 2.0 SD, $650; refurb 2.1 GHz, $849; 2.2, $899; 2.4, $949; new 2.1 SD, $945 after rebate; 2.4, $900 a/r; 2.0 Unibody, $1,199 a/r; more.
- Best G5 iMac Deals, 01.09. Used 17" 1.6 GHz Combo, $400; 1.8 SuperDrive, $450; 1.9 iSight, $575; 20" 1.8 GHz, $500; 2.0, $625; 2.1 iSight, $699.
- Best iPod nano deals, 01.09. New 3G/8 GB, $125 shipped; 4G/8 GB, $134 shipped; 16 GB, $175 shipped (most colors).
- Best Apple TV Deals, 01.08. Refurb 40 GB Apple TV, $199; new, $220; refurb 160 GB, $279; new, $320. Prices include ground shipping.
- Best Mac Pro Deals, 01.08. New 2.8 GHz 4-core, $2,099 after rebate; refurb 8-core, $2,399; new, $2,589 a/r; 3.0 $3,398 a/r; refurb 3.2, $4,099; new, $4,099 a/r.
- Best 12" PowerBook G4 Deals, 01.08. Used 867 MHz Combo, $490; 1.33 GHz, $548; 1.5 GHz SuperDrive, $595.
- Best 17" MacBook Pro Deals, 01.07. Used 2.16 GHz Core Duo, $1,190; 2.33 Core 2, $1,400; 2.4, $1,799; refurb 2.33, $1,799; 2.5, $1,899; new, $1,900; refurb 2.6, $2,299.
- Best Power Mac G5 Deals, 01.07. Used 1.8 GHz single, $500; dual, $629, 2.0, $700; dual-core, $929; 2.3, $999; 2.5 dual, $900; 2.7, $1,089; 2.5 Quad, $1,399.
- Best iPod shuffle Deals, 01.07. Refurb 1 GB '07, $39 shipped; new, $43; '08, $45; refurb 2 GB '07, $59 shipped; new, $58; '08, $63.
- More deals in our archive.
About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts
