Mac Musings
Intel's Promise Fulfilled: More Processing Power per Processor Cycle
Dan Knight - 2009.06.30 - Tip Jar
Popularity: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Short link: http://bit.ly/FwmLN
An interesting thing has happened since Apple transition to Intel CPUs: Consumer notebooks have moved backward in raw CPU speed yet offer better overall performance.
Geekbench is a benchmark program designed to measures CPU and memory performance. (Geekbench doesn't measure video or hard drive performance.) As processor architecture has improved, as the level 2 (L2) cache has changed size, and as the memory bus has increased in speed, scores have risen to the point where today's 13" 2.23 GHz MacBook Pro (more prosumer than pro or consumer) offers the same level of performance as the Late 2008 2.4 GHz Unibody MacBook despite a 9% difference in CPU speed.
3 Years of Progress
Moving from the original 1.86 GHz Core Duo MacBook to the 1.86 GHz Core 2 Duo version in Late 2006, Geekbench reports a 3.3% higher score. That's due to processor architecture alone, as specs were otherwise identical.
At the 2.0 GHz mark, we see some anomalies: The Late 2008 Unibody model is faster than the Late 2007, which in turn is faster than the Late 2006, yet the Early 2009 MacBook White lags behind the Late 2007 model.
What's going on there?
- The Late 2006 MacBook has a 4 MB cache and uses a 667 MHz memory bus.
- The Late 2007 MacBook has a 4 MB cache and uses an 800 MHz memory bus.
- The Late 2008 Unibody has a 3 MB cache and uses a 1066 MHz memory bus.
- The Early 2009 MacBook has a 3 MB cache and uses an 800 MHz memory bus with a 1066 MHz system bus.
The combination of the same CPU speed, the same memory bus, and a smaller L2 cache is what puts the 2.0 GHz MacBook White behind the 2007 model.

Promise fulfilled: Intel CPUs are providing more processing power per
CPU cycle.
There are some other interesting results:
- The 2.1 GHz Early 2008 MacBook outscores the 2.16 GHz Late 2006 model. The difference: A smaller cache in the CPU but a faster system bus and Intel's "Santa Rosa" chipset.
- The 2.13 GHz Early 2009 MacBook outscores the 2.2 GHz Late 2007 model. My guess is that this is due to the switch to Nvidia GeForce 9400M graphics, which I speculate puts less demands on the CPU.
- The 2.26 GHz Mid 2009 MacBook Pro matches the 2.4 GHz Late 2008 model, which was only slightly faster than the 2.4 GHz Early 2008 one. (The 2.53 GHz build-to-order 13" MBP scores 3436, about 9.5% faster than the new 2.26 GHz model.)
Frankly, I was stumped by the last one: Same memory bus, same cache size, same basic design, although Apple did add FireWire and an SD Card slot. How could an 9% slower CPU provide the same performance?
Part of it comes from moving from an 800 MHz memory bus to 1066 MHz, but that doesn't account for everything.
Primate Labs gave me part of the answer on its Mac Benchmarks page, which reports exactly which Intel CPU each model uses. The Late 2008 MacBook uses the Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 ("Montevina"), but the Pro model uses the P7550. Both are part of the same "Penryn 3M" family.
And then I noticed a second entry for the 2.26 MHz MacBook Pro, but with an Intel P8400 CPU. This one scored 3126 - virtually identical to the 2.4 GHz Early 2008 MacBook. Curious. Did Apple change CPUs early in the production run?
Whatever the case there, it's evident that Intel has been improving the computing efficiency of its CPUs. You can't predict performance based on CPU speed alone, as there have been architectural improvements going from Core Duo to Core 2 Duo to today's further improved Core 2 Duo processors. You don't have to improve raw clock speed to improve performance.
This time it looks like Intel itself has disproved the Megahertz
Myth.
Join us on Facebook!, follow us on Twitter, use our Google+ page, or read our RSS news feed
Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.
Recent articles by Dan Knight
- The MacBook Legacy: 2006 to 2011, 2012.05.16. Apple's original consumer Intel-based notebook, the MacBook filled an important niche until it was phased out in 2011.
- Good Idea/Bad Idea Gets on the Bus, 2002.11.15. Good idea: An industry standard bus. Bad idea: A bus nobody else uses.
- Good Idea/Bad Idea Looks at Disk Format Confusion, 2002.11.21. Good idea: Increased capacity for removable media. Bad idea: Too many formats to pick from.
- More in the Mac Musings index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Macintosh 512K 'Fat Mac', introduced 1984.09.10. The first Mac with enough memory for serious work.
- May 22 in LEM history: 73: Ethernet conceived - 98: Is Apple really back? - 00: Cheap Power Macs - 01: Copyright or copy wrong? - 02: OS X is growing the Mac user base - 03: DVD screen shots in OS X - 06: Best OS for older Macs - 07: CRTs and shock danger - Ihnatko on Macs - CPU upgrades for MDD Power Macs - 08: Mac 512K and Word changed my life
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- Mac Pro on the Way Out or Changing with the Times?, Dan Bashur, Apple, Tech, and Gaming, 2012.05.22. No other desktop Mac offers a wide range of expansion options, but is that enough reason for Apple to keep the behemoth powerhouse Mac Pro around?
- iPhone 3D: Stereo Photography and 3D Movies for the Rest of Us, Anne Onymus, The Rumor Mill, 2012.05.22. Until now, stereo photography and 3D movies required expensive dedicated equipment. With the iPhone 3D, Apple will make it available to the masses.
- iPad 2 'Feels Like an Upgrade' from New iPad, Samsung Tops Apple in Smartphone Market, and More, iOS News Review, 2012.05.21. Also Apple to maintain tablet dominance, working in portrait mode, Wozniak would like to see end of walled garden, and more.
- MacBook Airs Top Ultrabooks, Boost MacBook Performance, MacBook Pro Update in June?, and More, The 'Book Review, 2012.05.21. Also Retina displays available now but costly, USB 3 expected in next MacBook rev, hybrid drives an affordable alternative to SSDs, and more.
- Flashback Removal Update for OS X 10.5 Leopard, Dropbox Pick of the Cloud Litter, and More, Mac News Review, 2012.05.18. Also Kodak Hero supports wireless printing from anywhere, WinOnX lets you run Windows apps on Macs, and free Mac Malware Remover.
- More links in our archive.
Recent Deals
- Best iPod classic Deals
- Best Mac OS X 10.6, iLife, and iWork Deals
- Best iPad Deals
- Best 15" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best iBook G4 Deals
- Best Classic Mac OS Deals
- Best Mac Pro Deals
- Best 15" PowerBook G4 Deals
- Best 17" PowerBook G4 Deals
- More deals in our archive.
About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact
Follow
Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac
on Facebook
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Macsales.com SuperSpeed SSDs from $58. Transform your Mac with an SSD Solution of up to 960GB! You won't believe it's the same machine! Once you experience an OWC SSD, no going back! - Macsales.com
Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Macpokeronline.com will show you how to download and play Poker on a Mac natively on your Mac in just minutes.
Favorite Sites
MacSurfer
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac Museum
Deal Brothers
DealMac
Mac2Sell
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ
Affiliates
Amazon.com
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay

