Mac Scope

Rooting for Microsoft?

Stephen Van Esch - 2003.09.17

Grind you teeth, readers, because I'm going to be asking you to do something you likely haven't had to do since Microsoft gave Apple a financial hand in 1997.

That's right, it's time to root for Microsoft.

Now this is usually a counterintuitive stance for most Mac users. Microsoft is considered (even by some levelheaded writers) to be a company hell-bent on making computing mediocrity the gold standard. Laughing all the way to the bank, Microsoft rips off competitors, releases buggy software, and generally makes computer users miserable.

To add insult to injury, Microsoft will calmly state that it "innovates" and has the best interest of the consumer in mind.

Pass the bong, please.

But in the Eolas patent case, which cuts right to the heart of modern Web, I'm in Microsoft's corner. If the ruling stands, and you're a Web developer who uses a plug-in on your website, you could be in for a serious headache. Workarounds must be found and implemented if your website uses plug-ins to display content within a browser.

Those who aren't Web developers will also be affected if this verdict stands. It's completely normal for users to expect a seamless multimedia experience. With this patent, though, that experience may turn into something annoying - at the very least. While the case is directed against Microsoft, other browser makers (including Apple) will definitely be caught in the fallout.

This case highlights one thing in particular: The patent system is a complete shambles. Overworked and understaffed, questionable patents are approved with alarming regularity.

Companies are continuously looking for an advantage, and some seem to be taking advantage of the patent office's problems. Please note that both Microsoft (which has patented stylesheets) and Apple (which patented themes) have abused the patent system.

Eolas is clearly looking for a good payout for technology that is widely used. Do they have a case? That really depends on whom you ask. Those who believe that patent is too broad will argue that the patent should never have been issued. For those who believe that the underdog deserves his dues, the case is an example of someone getting something for their hard work.

I personally find myself in the same corner as a software monopolist that creates inferior products. If this ruling stands, there's a chance that ordinary users and web designers will be seriously harmed. It's not often that I find myself in this position, but I'm willing to bite the bullet and root for Microsoft in this case.

Join us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, use our Google+ page, or read our RSS news feed

Stephen Van Esch is the founder and president of the E-learning Foundry, an online training resource for Mac users. Steve loves the Mac and is doubly bilingual, since he's also fluent in Windows and French.

Recently on Mac Scope

Connecting with the broader Macintosh community, 2007.04.06. "But beyond the very minor celebrity status that came with being published on Low End Mac, it gave me a real opportunity to participate in the Mac community."
Hardware failure, that rare Mac headache, 2004.07.09. Macs are usually pretty reliable, but a hardware failure after just two-and-a-half years is still disappointing.
Still waiting for iTunes Music Store Canada, sort of, 2004.06.23. While the pay-per-tune model makes sense, Apple's post-purchase copy management flies in the face of Canadian copyright law.
More in the Mac Scope index.

Links for the Day

Mac of the Day: Color Classic, introduced 1993.02.01. A cult classic, this was the compact Mac with color that everyone had been waiting for.
May 23 in LEM history: 00: A computer I understood - 01: Mac: A dream fulfilled - 02: PowerKey - 03: 12" PowerBook better than 15" TiBook - 05: The First Macs - 06: What's in your workspace? - Picking the right laptop - Sun has set on the G4 - 06: Running your notebook using flash memory - 08: MacBook holds its own against Dell and HP
Support Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Opinions expressed are those of their authors and may not reflect the opinion of Cobweb Publishing. Advice is presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all.
Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2013 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc. unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Low End Mac, LowEndMac, and lowendmac.com are trademarks of Cobweb Publishing Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iPad, iPhone, iMac, iPod, MacBook, Mac Pro, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.
Please report errors to .
LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Email may be published at our discretion unless marked "not for publication"; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it, and we don't share the information we have with others. For more details, see our Terms of Use.