Low End Mac Reader Specials

TypeStyler For Mac OS X is Now Shipping! Download The Free Fully Functional 60 Day Tryout at www.typestyler.com

OWC: Get the Right Memory / Ram for your Mac. Top Quality, Competitive Prices, Lifetime Warranty. Expert Support and Video Installation Guidies too! 4.0GB Matched Sets from $87.99, Options up to 32GB. Click here

Poker Mac Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker application such as Full Tilt Poker Mac.

Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.

Compare products like desktop computers, apple laptops, apple macs, and LCD Monitors side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for new mobile phones, sat nav systems, or MP3 players. The Ciao online shopping community makes searching products easy for you.

X-Basics

Why OS X Doesn't Need a RAM Disk

Dan Knight - 2002.02.01

As noted elsewhere today, I've been using ramBunctious, a classic Mac OS RAM disk program, for years. Although it works in Classic mode under OS X, the RAM disks it creates are inaccessible to X, so I've retired a real workhorse program.

I like the idea of using a RAM disk, because these are files I may be accessing many times during the course of the day, but now I've learned that Mac OS X may make RAM disks a thing of the past. That's because X can use any available system memory to cache files - which helps explain why Classic under X had a higher disk score than Mac OS 9.2.2 all by itself in yesterday's tests.

As Ric Davis explained to me, X will intelligently cache files - the more often you access them, the more likely they'll be cached for lightning-fast access. Although that won't give the same speedy load times the first time a file is accessed, repeated access should be at pretty much RAM disk speed.

Benefits of not using a RAM disk include not locking up all that memory (128 MB in my case), not spending several seconds loading the RAM disk image at startup, and not having to worry about the computer crashing with unsaved contents on the RAM disk (which shouldn't be a problem with X anyhow).

That said, Gregory Youngs writes that all disk writes are cached under BSD/OS X, which means that a freeze, lockup, or power failure could cost you "saved" data that's only been cached and not yet written to the hard drive. Youngs further notes that the Unix sync command, which forces the OS to write all cached data to disk, doesn't appear to be available under OS X.

With the stability of Unix and a UPS (or portable), you minimize the chance of losing unwritten cached data, but there's still a risk. (It's probably less of a risk than we had with the regular freezes, bombs, and other problems that required a forced restart under the classic Mac OS).

Perhaps best of all, under OS X you don't have to fiddle with disk cache size for optimum performance - it's all done automatically by the OS.

I'd still like to see a RAM disk like ramBunctious (they're working on it), even if only to see if it's worth trying, but with caching this good, a RAM disk might not make any sense at all. LEM

Recent X-Basics Columns

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Custom Search

Amazon.com

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Video Cards
Email Lists

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum

DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ

Abandonware
   Petition

Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
B&H
MacMall
TechRestore
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Advertise

Open Link