macOS Tahoe Beta 8 is out: Build 25A5349a

Today Apple sent out the 8th Developer Beta, with this build shaping up to potentially be the final one before the Release Candidate (RC) build. It weighs in at 2.52 GB if you’re coming from Developer Beta 7 on an M4 MacBook Air. We may or may not see a 9th Developer Beta if and only if there is a big major enough worthy for Apple to release a whole new build.
.

.

macOS Tahoe development timeline

Other “beta 8” OS releases concurrently:

  • iOS and iPadOS 26 (Build 23A5330a)
    .
  • watchOS 26 (Build 23R5350a)
    .
  • visionOS 26 (Build 23M5332a)
    .
  • tvOS 26 (Build 23J5348a)
    .
  • audioOS 26 (Build 23J5348a)
    .

Other Betas now out:

  • macOS Sequoia 15.7 Release Candidate 4 (Build 24G217)
    .
  • macOS Sonoma 14.8 Release Candidate 4 (Build 23J18)
    .

Tracking Geekbench 6 Performance between builds

Disclaimer: While artificial benchmarks only tell part of the story when it comes to the performance of any device, they still offer some form of insight. Ever since I got my own M4 MacBook Air, I benched it on Geekbench 6 in the same environment.
.

.
Update about high disk writes

Spotlight seems to be doing better, and the amount of disk writes done to the system has been lessened. I was being quite protective of the new device I have, although it’s inevitable the SSD will be used quite alot. Newer versions of macOS have more read/write cycles done to the drive, and fortunately modern Mac SSDs are built to last forever.

I just didn’t want to keep seeing the write cycles needlessly carry on like this even if my SSD is basically built to last forever, wanting to give it a little bit of extra breathing room. It’s normal to worry about such things as these are non-upgradeable SSDs, but these are real-dependable SSDs. In Developer Beta 6 it was going into the hundreds of GBs within minutes of logging in, so I got spooked.
.

.
What some others are saying elsewhere

What I think

Beta 8 is for sure the best of the bunch in terms of performance. When running an arm version of Windows 11 in UTM, there was a noticeable jump up in Beta 7, and more so in this 8th Beta. Developer Beta 6 and earlier made UTM feel quite sluggish, making it difficult to replicate that ease-of-use feeling from Sequoia where Windows 11 arm x64 would boot and run apps so very fast. It launches and boots nice n’ fast again like it did in Sequoia.

I’m not sure I like the new “apps” replacing launchpad, for the same reason I outlined in an earlier article: I want the screen de-cluttered and a full view of my available apps to be seen, kind of like opening a drawer and focusing my view there. I also dislike how when I resize the “apps” window to be larger, it doesn’t remember the resizing for later. It just makes it easier on my eyes to have a little more on-screen.

It would have been nice to see fewer Macs left behind such as some 2018 models, although the UHD 630 is understandably underpowered. Perhaps doing something like a requirement of attaching a compatible metal-enabled GPU such as an RX 580. The T2 models are major challenge and will need alot of time and research to get going (if doable) on OCLP.
.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.