Mac Spectrum

Leopard Runs Very Nicely on PowerPC Macs

- 2008.11.19 - Tip Jar

Popularity:

Short link: http://bit.ly/Vh0ef

There has been lots of talk on various Apple discussion websites and Mac mailing lists that I subscribe to about how Mac OS X 10.5 "Leopard" is not geared towards PowerPC Macs and was developed with Intel Macs in mind. I disagree with this.

A fellow group member had Leopard installed on a 1.67 GHz PowerBook G4 and claimed it was unusable, so much so that he reverted to Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger", something I found very strange. I have seen Leopard running on a number of G4 Macs. I even have it installed on my 1.25 GHz eMac with 1 GB of RAM, and it runs lovely; even when it had 512 MB of RAM, it was very much usable, and maxing it to its 2 GB limit will make it a very snappy machine.

Power Mac G4 'Sawtooth' As a tinkerer and lover of low-end Macs, I have installed it on both a 400 MHz PowerBook G4 Titanium with 1 GB of RAM and a PowerMac G4 Sawtooth with 640 MB of RAM (see Is Running Leopard on a Sawtooth Power Mac G4 Worth Doing?). While both of these machines are way under the minimum specs Apple restricts Leopard too, they performed a lot better than I expected. Both were useable, but under heavy use they would struggle.

Apple's minimum spec is an 867 MHz G4 with 512 MB of RAM. I have seen it running on an 867 MHz PowerBook G4 with 1 GB of RAM, which is about as low as you can get officially, and it runs like a dream.

I think the claims of Leopard not being PowerPC optimised is utter rubbish. I had a 1.83 GHz Core Duo Intel iMac with 1 GB of RAM, and Leopard never really ran properly on it. It wasn't until I upped it to 2 GB of RAM that the machine responded and worked properly - that made it more responsive and a lot more useable, but it was still plagued with problems, so much so that I at one point reinstalled Leopard, but the problems persisted.

In some respects, I think my 1.25 GHz eMac with 1 GB of RAM copes better than the Intel iMac did. I don't mean it runs faster - obviously the faster chipset, better graphics, and dual-core give the iMac the edge - but the overall stability and sluggishness on the iMac (considering it's way higher specifications compared to the eMac) is unbelievable.

I have had better results from PowerPC Macs, even lower-end G4s, than on Intel Macs. If there is anyone thinking of installing Leopard on older PowerPC Macs and wondering whether it is worth it, I say go for it.

Leopard is RAM hungry. If you are going to put it on a G4, make sure you have at least 1 GB of RAM, just to make the Leopard experience a nice one. Bear in mind the very low requirements of Tiger, so if you want a lightning fast machine, it might be a better alternative.

Intel Macs seems to be plagued with problem - at least mine was. It was a sad day when Apple dropped PowerPC Macs.

Until Mac OS X 10.6 "Snow Leopard" is released - which is supposed to cut out the PowerPC platform altogether - I shall not be upgrading to another Intel machine.

Join us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, use our Google+ page, or read our RSS news feed

Links for the Day

Mac of the Day: Centris 610, introduced 1993.02.10. This was the Mac we used when we started Low End Mac in 1997.
May 24 in LEM history: 99: Mac sales up, iMac sales down? - 01: Speeding up digital photography - 02: The Internet, research, and plagiarism - 04: NewerTech TiBook battery - Optical mice from Contour - 06: Power Mac today or Intel tomorrow? - 07: G5: Apple's last fling with PowerPC - G3: From 233 MHz to 1.1 GHz
Support Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Opinions expressed are those of their authors and may not reflect the opinion of Cobweb Publishing. Advice is presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all.
Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2013 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc. unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Low End Mac, LowEndMac, and lowendmac.com are trademarks of Cobweb Publishing Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iPad, iPhone, iMac, iPod, MacBook, Mac Pro, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.
Please report errors to .
LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Email may be published at our discretion unless marked "not for publication"; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it, and we don't share the information we have with others. For more details, see our Terms of Use.