The 'Book Page

The Price Is Right

July 23, 1999 - Dan Knight - Tip Jar

I'll admit it right up front: I was expecting the iBook to come in at about $1,400, not $1,600. But then, I was expecting a different computer.

A lot of us were expecting something smaller and lighter than the PowerBook G3. The 300 MHz processor and 800 x 600 screen we expected. A color scheme fitting for a portable iMac we expected. USB, no floppy, a rugged case, and a long battery life we expected.

We also thought wireless networking would be an option (it is), as would the CD-ROM drive (it's standard). We expected a compact portable, something perhaps more akin to the eMate or PowerBook 2400.

Instead, we got a full sized laptop.

Five Portable Computer Markets

What I didn't really understand is that there are five different markets for portable computers. (This doesn't include semi-computers, such as the Palm, the Windows CE devices, or Apple's discontinued Newton.)

PC Magazine (8/99) lists the following markets:

  1. Mini-notebooks. These weigh 3-4 pounds and run full-blown desktop operating systems and applications. At present, this is exclusively a Windows market, although the PowerBook 2400 was just a few ounces over the limit.
  2. Thin and light notebooks. These weight 4-5 pounds and have a full-size keyboard. Again, this is a Windows-only market. (The 2400 was thicker than these and had a shrunken keyboard.)
  3. Mainstream notebooks. Usually 7-8 pounds with a 13-14" screen. The PowerBook G3 qualifies here.
  4. Desktop replacements. These have high-end processors, large (14-15") screens, and weigh about 9 pounds. Except for the weight, the PowerBook G3 qualifies.
  5. Value notebooks. These are less expensive alternatives to mainstream computers. The emphasis is price, not performance. That's the iBooks' forte.

Reviewed mini-notebooks ranged from $1,600 to $2,300. Thin-and-light models from $1,900 to $4,000. Mainstream notebooks were all in the $1,800 to $2,350 range. Desktop replacements covered the $2,000 to $4,600 spectrum.

For the value-conscious, notebooks ranged from $1,300 on the low end to $1,700 at the top. Weights ranged from 6.2 to 7.5 pounds. Almost all models have a 12.1" 800 x 600 screen, a 24x CD-ROM, and 32 or 64 MB of memory. Most have an integrated 56k modem, 2 MB of video memory, and no ethernet port.

With on exception, hard drives are in the 4.0-4.5 GB range. Memory can reach at least 160 MB on all but one. Processors range from the Mobile Pentium MMX at 300 MHz to the Mobile Pentium II at 300 MHz. Battery life as tested with ZD Batterymark 3.0 can be as little as one hour and twenty minutes or as long as five hours and five minutes.

iBook vs. Wintel Value

I think you already see how the iBook compares. At $1,600, it fits comfortably within the range of value notebooks. At 6.7 pounds, it's midway between the lightest and heaviest that PC Magazine looked at. Size is comparable. The 3.2 GB hard drive is smaller than all but one value model.

The 12.1" TFT screen matches what the Wintel notebooks offer, as do the 24x CD-ROM and 56k modem.

In terms of battery life, the iBook should rank with the best PC Magazine tested. Memory can be expanded well beyond the needs of most value-oriented users, so that's pretty much a tie with the Wintel world.

Of course, the 300 MHz G3 inside the iBook will absolutely smoke the 300 MHz Mobile Pentium, Celeron, Mobile Celeron, and Mobile Pentium II processors in these laptops, let alone the underpowered AMD K6 used in the WinBook XL.

Factor in ethernet, which requires a PC Card on the Wintel portables, and the iBook pulls comfortably into the lead. (Since AirPort PC Cards will be available, I'll call the iBook's $100 AirPort option a tie.)

Compared with the best value Windows laptops, the iBook easily holds its own. To top it off, Apple is an established brand - some of the less expensive Windows notebooks sport obscure names like AMS, ChemBook, and WinBook.

iBook vs. iMac

The iBook is also being marketed as a portable iMac. Feature for feature, color for color, they are quite comparable. The iMac is about 10% faster (333 MHz vs. 300 MHz), has a larger screen (13.8" viewable, 1024 x 768 resolution), and includes a bigger hard drive (6 GB vs. 3.2 GB).

The iBook is a lot lighter (6.7 lbs. vs. 38.1 lbs.), more compact (I won't even bother quoting specs), and runs about 6 hours longer when not plugged into the wall.

For $400 extra, you gain 6 hours of battery life while losing over 31 pounds of weight. You also have the AirPort option, which is not yet available for the iMac or other desktop systems (let's hope someone fills that void).

Considering the cost of an active matrix display and a LithIon battery, the fact that Apple can sell the iBook for only $400 more than the iMac is quite impressive.

iBook vs. Lombard

Apple is most emphatically not marketing the iBook as an alternative to the $2,500 and up PowerBook G3. The G3 has a much larger screen (1024 x 768), runs 10-33% faster, weighs less, is a bit more compact, has a larger hard drive, and looks absolutely professional and gorgeous in black with a white (backlit) Apple logo.

Of course, the PowerBook G3/333 does cost $900 more than the iBook, so Mac lovers who crave portability without breaking the bank shouldn't feel they're making any unacceptable compromise buying the blue-and-white or orange-and-white iBook.


The iBook is an excellent value, whether compared with value-priced Wintel notebooks, the best selling iMac, or the only more powerful laptop on the market, Apple's PowerBook G3.

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Latest Deals on Low End Mac

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Custom Search

Follow Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac on Facebook

Favorite Sites

Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Deal Brothers
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ

The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
Macgo Blu-ray Player
Parallels Desktop for Mac

Low End Mac's store


Open Link