Last month we looked at the megapixel myth. As we noted
then, "in the rush to market megapixels, images can actually be worse
with a high megapixel camera than from a lower megapixel one."
The sad truth is that it's worse than we thought.
Mason Resnick of Adorama has exposed another issue caused by an
unhealthy fixation on megapixels: As compact digicams include more and
more megapixels on their tiny sensors, something has to give. In
Stop the Megapixel Madness!, he says,
"...each pixel has its own microscopic lens, and each
lens is separated by a microns-wide wall, or septum, to prevent light
from falling from one pixel into the next and thereby reducing image
quality . . . to make room for eight, nine, or (heaven help
us, again) ten million pixels, those septums get either unusably thin,
or are removed altogether."
The result of removing the septum? Spillover from one pixel another,
which can cause fuzziness and increase noise (the digital equivalent of
film grain).
As we've said before, 3 megapixels is all you need for a great 5x7,
and most people can't tell the difference between an 8x10 from a
3 MP image or a 6 MP one. A 6 MP digital will easily
give you a 12x18 print that looks very sharp indeed.
So why the fixation with megapixels? It's not quality, it's
marketing. If 3 MP is better than 1.3 MP, and 6 MP is better
than 4 MP, then 12 MP must be even better.
While it's true that more megapixels means better images that can be
printed even larger on digital single lens reflex (DSLR) cameras,
that's not always the case with compact digital cameras. Beyond a
certain point, the small imagers with their increasingly small
individual pixel sensor get small enough that digital noise becomes a
factor. Your photos may have more pixels, but they are also likely to
have a lot more grain.
Make the pixels small enough, and the septum (the dividers between
the individual sensors), no matter how thin you make it, ends up
cutting off some light, further increasing grain. The solution? For
some manufacturers, it's removing the septum, which means that light
can spill over to adjacent pixels.
The result is a lower contrast, grainier, fuzzier image, as Adorama
clearly shows on its website. Too many megapixels in a compact digicam
can mean worse images, not the better ones you would expect. And none
of the manufacturers are going to make a point of telling you if they
don't have a septum on their imager.
Don't believe it? Check out the
comparison images that Adorama has posted (reduced even further
below). Even when greatly reduced to 0.15 MP for use on the Web, those
shot with an 8 MP DSLR look gorgeous, as everyone would expect.
Those shot with an 8 MP compact camera look horrid: low contrast,
washed out colors, more grain, and blurring of details. And there's
nothing you can do in Photoshop to fix those problems.
You can, however, make matters even worse by shooting at a higher
ISO setting. Again, it's something DSLRs can do well with their larger
sensors, but as far as compacts go, it's going to further increase
noise and graininess in your images.
Comparison of 8 MP DSLR vs. 8 MP compact (reduced from Adorama
website)
As Resnick notes, "You may be able to make big blow-ups with your
12MP compact, but they won't look as good as manufacturers want you to
believe."
Don't buy a camera based on specs. All imagers are not created
equal. All lenses are not created equal. And all 8 MP images are
not created equal, and 8 MP may be more than you need. Kudos to
Adorama, a camera retailer, for pointing out the truth.
Look at the images the camera creates. That's the true test, not the
number of megapixels in its images.
We believe in the long term value of Apple hardware. You should be able to use your Apple gear as long as it helps you remain productive and meets your needs, upgrading only as necessary. We want to help maximize the life of your Apple gear.
. LINKS: We allow and encourage
links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear
within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses
will not be published without permission. If you prefer your
message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters
may be edited for length, context, and to match house style. PRIVACY: We don't collect
personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more
details, see our Terms of Use.
Page not found | Low End Mac
Welcome Image and Text
We believe in the long term value of Apple hardware. You should be able to use your Apple gear as long as it helps you remain productive and meets your needs, upgrading only as necessary. We want to help maximize the life of your Apple gear.
We believe in the long term value of Apple hardware. You should be able to use your Apple gear as long as it helps you remain productive and meets your needs, upgrading only as necessary. We want to help maximize the life of your Apple gear.
All of our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For
price quotes and advertising information, please contact
Page not found | Low End Mac
Welcome Image and Text
We believe in the long term value of Apple hardware. You should be able to use your Apple gear as long as it helps you remain productive and meets your needs, upgrading only as necessary. We want to help maximize the life of your Apple gear.
Bookmark in del.icio.us
Suggest to
Slashdot
