Low End G4: Migrating to an Older Power Mac
We're a bit less low-end at Low End Mac today, although we've migrated to an older Mac.
I've been using a dual 1 GHz "Mirror Drive Door" Power Mac G4 (from 2002) as my main production machine for several years. I bought it secondhand and slowly upgraded it from 768 MB of RAM to 2 GB, with larger hard drives, with a couple USB 2.0 cards, and with a 16x SuperDrive. The secondary SuperDrive (a 4x unit), CPUs, and Radeon 9000 graphics card remain the same.
For some time, I've been working from an external FireWire hard drive, on the theory that FireWire 400 may be a bit faster than the internal ATA bus and that it's easier to move everything to another computer in the even the MDD acts up if it's on an external drive.
Today I got to test that theory. Several times this morning I got the OS X gray screen of death. It's kind of warm, so it might be heat related. Or it could be a stick of RAM acting up. Or it might be something else completely.
Easier to switch computers than spend hours troubleshooting. Besides which, this would give me the chance to test some theories.
I have the good fortune to have three G4 Power Macs at Low End Mac headquarters. In addition to the 1 GHz dual MDD, I have a "Mystic" dual G4 upclocked to 500 MHz from 2000 (bought secondhand) and a "Digital Audio" (from 2001, donated) upgraded with a dual G4 from Giga Designs (also secondhand). Officially rated at 1.8 GHz, which overclocks the 1.42 GHz CPU by 26%, I've never been able to get it to run faster than 1.6 GHz. Still, that's 60% faster than my main Mac.
This morning I decided to run these three Power Mac G4 models through their paces, using conventional benchmarks and timing a few things I do regularly with a stopwatch. Each Mac was run from the same external FireWire hard drive, and the Radeon 9000 video card was moved from one machine to another. I also installed a 4-port Sonnet USB 2.0 card and connected everything (printers, hubs, etc.) as before.
There were some differences other than CPU speed. Bus speed was slower as we moved to older Macs, and the MDD has more RAM than the other two. Here are the specifics and timed results (rounded off to the nearest second):
Model Mystic MDD Dig Aud CPU speed 500 MHz 1 GHz 1.6 GHz L2 cache 1 MB 256 KB 512 KB L2 speed 250 MHz 1 GHz 1.6 GHz L3 cache none 2 MB none L2 speed n/a 500 MHz* n/a Installed RAM 1.25 GB 2.0 GB 1.25 GB Bus speed 100 MHz 167 MHz 133 MHz Startup to login 69 sec. 48 sec. 43 sec. Login to Finder 42 sec. 31 sec. 46 sec. Launch Classic 33 sec. 26 sec. 23 sec. Open website 22 sec. 12 sec. 7 sec. Total time 167 sec. 117 sec. 120 sec.
The Giga Designs upgrade has the biggest and fastest Level 2 (L2) cache, which should give it a real edge in raw processing power.
However, the Mirror Drive Door (MDD) has a high speed Level 3 (L3) cache, which I'm making an educated guess runs at 500 MHz and provided data to the CPU at three times the speed of motherboard memory. In addition, the MDD memory bus runs at 167 MHz - 25% faster than the 133 MHz bus in the Digital Audio (conversely, the DA has a 20% slower bus). This will give the MDD a big advantage when it comes to getting data from memory.
Startup and login aren't things I do often, usually a few times a week. Launching Classic is something I usually do once per startup, although if Classic is acting oddly, I will relaunch it. Opening the master site file (124 KB) in Claris Home Page 3.0 is something I do several times a day, averaging once for every new article we publish or update on Low End Mac.
I also ran all three machines through our usual benchmark suite:
Let 1000 Windows Bloom
Let 1000 Windows Bloom draws 1000 windows to your screen as quickly as possible. Machines were tested using Mac OS X 10.4.11 "Tiger" and 10.5.7 "Leopard". Times are rounded to the nearest 1/10 of a second.
Mystic MDD DA 10.4.11 27.5 13.4 14.0 10.5.7 39.9 16.4 24.3
The Mirror Drive Door wins this one, although by only 4.4%.
This program creates a fractal pattern, which can really bog down a CPU. Results are reported in Mflops.
Mystic MDD DA 10.4.11 3,411 8,565 13,290 10.5.7 3,322 8,470 13,220
The 1.6 GHz upgraded Digital Audio smokes the Mirror Drive Door with a 55% higher score.
Xbench has been out for some time. We used Xbench 1.3, which is calibrated so a 2.0 GHz Power Mac G5 scores 100.
10.4.11 Mystic MDD DA Overall 24.0 50.4 56.3 CPU 30.2 54.3 86.3 Threads 39.1 71.8 114.2 Memory 21.6 38.4 28.4 Quartz 25.3 52.4 62.8 OpenGL 34.6 60.9 74.1 User Int. 11.0 53.2 48.4 Drive 36.8 59.3 53.5
The upgraded Digital Audio wins overall, although the Mirror Drive Door wins three benchmarks: Memory due to a faster system bus (167 MHz vs. 133 MHz), and User Interface and Drive could be due to the faster memory bus and L3 cache. Overall, the DA wins by almost 12%.
10.5.7 Mystic MDD DA Overall 20.0 47.6 45.7 CPU 29.9 54.1 86.3 Threads 35.1 53.8 75.0 Memory 21.5 43.8 30.7 Quartz 24.6 61.5 65.7 OpenGL 34.6 54.4 64.5 User Int. 7.1 27.9 21.6 Drive 36.5 59.8 53.7
In a surprising upset, the 1 GHz Mirror Drive Door edges past the 1.6 GHz Digital Audio, but by barely 4%. The DA smokes the CPU, Threads, and OpenGL tests, while the MDD wins Memory hands down, does significantly better on User Interface, and edges out the Drive comparison by 11%.
Geekbench is a cross-platform benchmark that runs on PowerPC Macs, Intel Macs, and Windows PCs, making it possible to compare these old Power Macs to today's Intel-based Macs. Geekbench only tests the processor and memory systems, so drive performance isn't a factor and graphics should have minimal impact.
10.4.11 Mystic MDD DA Overall 454 900 1218 Integer 524 1169 1673 Fl. Point 587 1026 1471 Memory 250 495 486 Streams 161 349 210
The 1.6 GHz Digital Audio wins by 35% overall, winning the Integer and Floating Point tests by 43%, losing the Memory test by less than 2%, and getting smoked on the Streams test.
10.5.7 Mystic MDD DA Overall 460 943 1311 Integer 506 1117 1638 Fl. Point 632 1185 1784 Memory 226 485 454 Streams 170 406 235
Under Leopard, the upgraded DA wins by 39% overall - taking Integer by 46%, Floating Point by 50% while losing Memory by 6% and Streams by a huge margin.
Every benchmark gives us a different piece of the picture. For sheer processing power, the 1.6 GHz dual G4 wins hands down, but thanks to a faster system bus and a Level 3 cache, the Mirror Drive Door holds its own against a 60% faster CPU with a larger L2 cache.
In the best of all possible worlds, the Giga Designs upgrade would be able to achieve its claimed 1.8 GHz, boosting power by 12.5% - and the upgrade would be compatible with the 167 MHz system bus found in the faster Mirror Drive Door models (which would mean either 1.75 GHz or 1.83 GHz) and take advantage of the faster memory bus and L3 cache, in which case that machine would really scream.
In terms of value, the best bet is probably a used 1.25 GHz Mirror Drive Door Power Mac with dual G4s, currently available for as little as $400 from used Mac dealers - and probably less on eBay and even less on Craigslist. Get the version that doesn't have FireWire 800 and does boot into Mac OS 9, and you'll have a 167 MHz system bus, a 4 GB L3 cache, Ultra ATA100 for internal hard drives, two optical drive bays, room for 2 GB of RAM, and no need to hassle with third-party CPU upgrades. It's the most powerful Mac that can boot the Classic Mac OS, and with its even bigger L3 cache, it could give my 1.6 GHz upgraded Digital Audio a real run for the money.
If you have access to a free or low cost accelerator, however, avoid the handful of G4 Power Macs that use a 167 MHz system bus. The ultimate Power Mac G4 to use with a CPU upgrade would be the Quicksilver and Quicksilver 2002 lines, which have a 133 MHz system bus, support up to 1.5 GB of RAM, work with "big" hard drives (over 128 GB), has two optical drive bays, and can take accelerators as fast as 2.0 GHz - if you can find them nowadays. Bang for the buck, the 733 MHz and 800 MHz single processor models are the ones to buy, as faster Quicksilvers have L3 caches that generally have to be removed when used with a CPU upgrade. These start at about $200.
For upgrading, I'm a huge fan of dual-processor systems if you're running any version of Mac OS X. Drawback is, a new dual-core upgrade will set you back $300 and up these days and may not offer any more performance than the Dual 1.25 GHz MDD at $100 less. However, if you have a low cost CPU upgrade option, these entry-level Quicksilvers can be your value choice.
It's all a matter of your needs, your plans, your wants, and your budget. There's a lot of life in these old G4 Power Macs, as they can boot into OS 9, support Classic Mode through OS X 10.4, and can run OS X 10.5 if you want to or need to.
I've been happily using G4 Macs since 2000 and remain very productive. I don't want to rip video on these machines, but for everything else I do, they are more than adequate. What more do you need?
Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.
Recent articles by Dan Knight
- The Late 2012 iMac Value Equation, 2012.10.31. Thinner, lighter, faster, USB 3, improved graphics, Fusion Drive option, and no SuperDrive sum up the new iMacs.
- The 13" Retina MacBook Pro Value Equation, 2012.10.30. Take the 13" MacBook Pro, add a Retina Display, remove the SuperDrive, and drop almost a pound from its weight.
- The Late 2012 Mac mini Value Equation, 2012.10.29. The entry-level Mac mini is a nice step up, but the top-end quad-core model is a powerhouse.
- More in the Mac Musings index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Quadra 950, introduced 1992.05.18. Apple's huge tower has 5 NuBus slots and runs a 33 MHz 68040 processor.
- May 20 in LEM history: 99: New type of G3 daughter card - 02: iBook G3/700 - PowerBook 1400 very likable - 03: QuickBooks Pro 5 the accounting leader? - 05: Mac mini as disposable as a PC? - 08: Slot-load iMacs: SE/30 for a new generation - SheepShaver - Compleat Guide to the Pismo PowerBook - Virtual PC works with Leopard
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- World Book Encyclopedia 2012 DVD, Tommy Thomas, Reviews, 2013.03.05. "You may be asking yourself, in an age of Wikipedia and instant information, is World Book still relevant?"
- Vintage Computer Festival SouthEast, April 20-21, 2013, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.25. Old Apple gear and old PCs.
- iMessage: The Ultimate Messaging Service?, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.21. In most ways, Apple's iMessage is far superior to BlackBerry Messenger.
- More links in our archive.
- Best Mac mini Deals
- Best 13" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Intel iMac Deals
- Best iPod touch Deals
- Best iPhone Deals
- Best iPod nano Deals
- Best iPod classic Deals
- Best Apple TV Prices
- More deals in our archive.
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Mac Driver Museum
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ