I was looking around on TechNN the other day (which is one of
the places I visit in my daily Web surfing routine), and I found an
interesting article on Cnet: Analysis:
Windows 2000 clock ticking down. It talked about how companies
who don't upgrade to Windows 2000 by the end of the current quarter
should wait for Windows XP.
You probably think I have converted to PC and am worrying about
upgrading Windows 95 on my own 200 MHz PC. I have not converted to
PC; don't worry about that. (Yes, I am worrying about what version
of Windows to put on my PC, but that's beside the point.)
What I did not like was a statement at the end of the article:
"In practice, a machine should die with whatever operating system
it was born with."
I do not agree with this statement at all. When you buy a
machine, you don't buy it for a year and then replace it; you are
spending that $1,000 or $1,500 or $2,500 on something that you hope
will last you three years, maybe four. However, this may not be
true for PCs anymore, but it is true with the Macintosh.
My Performa 6205CD, for example,
shipped in 1995 with System 7.5.1 (which has been compared to
Windows 95, but that is really comparing apples and oranges - no
pun intended). Right now, the same 6205 is running Mac OS 9.0, and
it can run 9.1. That's an operating system released in 2001 running
on a six-year-old computer.
I can go even further than that. The Macintosh Plus was released in 1986. Nine
years later you could run the then-current operating system (7.5.5)
on it, even though it was sluggish. That was nine years later!
In terms of being able to run current operating systems on older
hardware, the Macintosh wins almost every time. You can run Mac OS
9.1 on a Power Mac 7100/66 that
shipped with System 7.1.2 in March 1994. You can run Mac OS 7.6.1
on a Mac IIci that first shipped with
System 6.0.4 in September 1989. That's a 1997 operating system on a
1989 computer - and it runs well, too.
From my limited experience with PCs, Windows 95 does run on a
1989 vintage 80386-based PC, but it runs about as well as System
7.5 on an 8 MHz Plus. Windows 98 runs on a 75 MHz Pentium from
1995, but it can barely handle it.
This is one of those things that make me glad to be a Mac user.
Macs are good, solid investments as computers that can easily last
five or six years. Even if you don't plan to keep your computer for
more than three or four years, if you have a Mac, you know that
someone will be interested in buying your system once your needs
have changed.
PC users can't guarantee this. Windows XP wants a 300 MHz
Pentium-class chip (I have heard it is slow on this configuration),
and setup is supposed to be somewhat difficult. In fact, what I
have been hearing is that Microsoft recommends you not install it
on anything made before 2000 (in other words, anything that shipped
with Win95 is out of the question), and if you want fewer
headaches, go out and buy a new computer with XP preinstalled. With
some 34% of PC users still using Win95 and about 45% using Win98 (I
bet a number of those people upgraded from 95), how many people are
going to be able to use XP? The answer: less than half of PC
users.
Now for Mac OS X. The beige
G3/233 shipped in November 1997 with Mac OS 8, and Mac
OS X's minimum requirement is a G3/233 with 128 MB of RAM and
1.1 GB of hard drive space. Very simple. None of that "Well, if you
have this type of processor and this amount of RAM, it may
work," or "Since your computer does not have a supported (graphics
card/sound card), you will need to upgrade it by installing this,
that, and the other."
Since Macs last a long time and have the ability to run the
current version of the OS for longer, Macs end up saving you time
and money in the long term.
"In practice, a machine should die with whatever operating
system it was born with" does not apply to the Mac. Instead of
dying with the OS it was born with, a Mac can keep going and going
with an OS made years after the machine itself.
Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Opinions expressed are
those of their authors and may not reflect the opinion of Cobweb
Publishing. Advice is presented in good faith, but what works for one
may not work for all.
unless otherwise noted. All
rights reserved. Low End Mac, LowEndMac, and lowendmac.com are
trademarks of Cobweb Publishing Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh,
iPad, iPhone, iMac, iPod, MacBook, Mac Pro, and AirPort are
Additional company and product names may be trademarks or
registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.
: We allow and encourage links to
any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a
frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Email may be published at our discretion unless marked "not for
publication"; email addresses will not be published without permission,
and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. Letters may be
edited for length, context, and to match house style.
: We don't collect personal
information unless you explicitly provide it, and we don't share the
information we have with others. For more details, see our