Is Leopard Slower than Tiger on G4 Macs?
- 2009.04.17 - Tip Jar
I have had so many arguments with people stating that Apple deliberately geared Mac OS X 10.5 'Leopard' to perform much better on Intel machines so as to pull people away from the PowerPC platform, that I thought it was about time this myth was laid to rest. I wrote an article a few months ago (Leopard Runs Very Nicely on PowerPC Macs) and thought I would follow it up with some benchmarks and facts.
You might think it is a bit late now that we are about to enter the Snow Leopard era, but there are still so many machines out there capable of running Leopard yet are stuck with Mac OS X 10.4 'Tiger' because people are scared of slower performance.
I am writing this on an 867 MHz 15" PowerBook G4. I have been running Leopard on it for about six months with 768 MB of RAM, and it has been a pleasant experience. A few days ago I maxed it to 1 GB of RAM (the extra RAM really has made a lot of difference), and it is fitted with a 5400 RPM Fujitsu MHT2080AH 80 GB hard drive.
It is the lowest spec machine to officially support Leopard, so you would think that it would struggle to keep up, but it doesn't. So let's cut to the chase, let's look at the raw benchmark results.
I triple boot my PowerBook with Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.6), Mac OS X Tiger (10.4.11), and Mac OS 9.2.2, so it is easier to get an accurate reading of which OS is faster, as they are all using exactly the same hardware. This was one of the last Macs to boot natively into OS 9, so while there is no Classic support in Leopard, I have the best of both the latest OS and am able to run older software.
OS 9 absolutely screams along on this hardware.
- Mac OS X 10.4: Xbench is 27.58, and Geekbench is 542.
- Mac OS X 10.5: Xbench is 26.43, and Geekbench is 519.
Yes, there is a little performance drop (about 4%), but then Leopard is a difference kettle of fish. Tiger was designed to run on 300 MHz G3 machines and is far less dependent on your graphics card. I still hold my stance, that the main reason Apple raised the bar so high with the minimum specs of Leopard was to ensure maximum graphics capabilities.
I have run Leopard on a 400 MHz Power Mac and PowerBook, and it is definitely the graphics that pull the machine down. If you were to put a Leopard-compatible graphics card in a 400 MHz 'Sawtooth' Power Mac G4, I don't think you would have too much problem using it as an everyday machine.
Leopard isn't much slower than Tiger, and I think you would see the gap narrow even more on a higher end G4. With a better equipped graphics card, you might even see Leopard perform better.
The 867 MHz 15" Titanium PowerBook came with 32 MB ATI Radeon 9000, and the 867 MHz 12" PowerBook came with 32 MB Nvidia GeForce 4 420 graphics. The 1 GHz 15" Titanium PowerBook came with a 64 MB ATI Radeon 9000. The 1 GHz 17" PowerBook came with an Nvidia GeForce 4 440, and the 1.33 GHz 12" PowerBook came with a GeForce FX Go5200. Some, like the 1.67 GHz 17" Aluminium PowerBook, came with 128 MB ATI Mobililty Radeon 9700.
These would cope much better with the high graphics demands of Leopard - they have more powerful graphics cards than some of early Intel Macs, such as the 1.5 GHz Core Solo Mac mini, 1.67 GHz Core Duo Mac mini, 1.83 GHz Core Duo MacBook, and 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook, which was only equipped with a 64 MB shared Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950.
Leopard does run slightly slower on some PowerPC Macs, but then it is two years newer and has a lot of graphics intense features. Run it on a machine that has the minimum specs for Leopard, and you will see benchmark results drop slightly; run it on a higher spec'd G4, and you might even see them increase.
Leopard responds to as much as RAM as you can throw at it. I benchmarked my 867 MHz PowerBook G4 with both 768 MB of RAM and 1 GB of RAM, and adding extra RAM pushed both benchmark results and performance.
- With 768 MB RAM: Xbench 21.85 - Geekbench 424.
- With 1 GB RAM: Xbench 25.43 - Geekbench 519.
Got a Leopard capable G4 that is still running Tiger? Cram it with RAM and install Leopard, you won't regret it.
Recent articles by Simon Royal
- Vintage Computer Festival SouthEast, April 20-21, 2013, 2013.02.25. Old Apple gear and old PCs.
- iMessage: The Ultimate Messaging Service?, 2013.02.21. In most ways, Apple's iMessage is far superior to BlackBerry Messenger.
- iDroid: Run Android on iOS Hardware, 2013.02.20. Yes, you can run Android on an iPhone or iPod touch. But do you want to?
- More in the Mac Spectrum index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Mac LC II, introduced 1992.03.23. The LC gets 4 MB base RAM, gains virtual memory thanks to 68030 CPU.
- May 19 in LEM history: 99: Student Bill of Rights - 01: First Apple Stores - 03: Upgraded beige G3 problems - 04: The Mac legacy - More for Mac users in superstores than many realize - 06: Smart design make the MacBook a winner - 08: Top 10 freeware - My first iMac
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- World Book Encyclopedia 2012 DVD, Tommy Thomas, Reviews, 2013.03.05. "You may be asking yourself, in an age of Wikipedia and instant information, is World Book still relevant?"
- More links in our archive.
- Best Mac mini Deals
- Best 13" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Intel iMac Deals
- Best iPod touch Deals
- Best iPhone Deals
- Best iPod nano Deals
- Best iPod classic Deals
- Best Apple TV Prices
- More deals in our archive.
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Mac Driver Museum
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ