Windows Growing, Will Eventually Require a Googol of RAM

- 2006.05.30

According to Windows System Reqs. 1990-2006: More For Less, Windows requirements have been growing for some time.

Here's an interesting analysis you can do to talk about modeling in a science class or discuss with your geekish friends. People have been extrapolating Moore's Law forever and a day, but this article provides some less abstract information than the usual size-of-a-transistor data cited in the Wikipedia article.

The Yahoo article gives us RAM requirements on the various versions of Windows since Windows 3.1. Using this data, I have created a mathematical model of the amount of RAM needed by Windows. This enables me to make entirely unreasonable (but entertaining) extrapolations about the amount of RAM needed for future versions of Windows I like to call

The Lite Side Extrapolates Windows RAM Requirements

Some Other Snappy Title I'll Come Up With Later

Using Fathom (a statistics program used for modeling), I plugged in the values from the Yahoo article and generated the following graph and least-squares line:

Windows RAM Consumption Chart

You'll note the growth is exponential, since I had to take the log of the amount of RAM to make it a linear function.

Okay, so now we can plug in some numbers and determine the following interesting predictions:

If current trends continue:

by 2018 Windows will require 100 gigs of RAM. This is one byte of RAM for every star in the Milky Way Galaxy.
by 2022 Windows will require 500 gigabytes of RAM. (A child born today will be 16 years old.)
by 2024 Windows will require a terabyte of RAM.
by 2040 Windows will require a petabyte of RAM.
by 2052 one copy of Windows will require more RAM than the entire Internet in 2003
by 2107 one copy of Windows will have enough RAM to store a byte for each molecule in a mole (Avogadro's number)
by 2527 Windows will require a googol of RAM
by the year 10,000 Windows will require 101403 K of RAM - far larger than the number of known molecules in the universe.

Some other interesting extrapolations:

The model predicts that Windows in 1985 would have required about 100 KB of RAM. That is when Windows 1.0 was released, but its system requirements are not in the article.

Using the same model, if Windows had existed in 1980 it would have required about 13 KB RAM.

And if Windows had existed in 1960 it would have used just 4 bytes of RAM - just enough to display the Blue Screen of Death on a 7-segment display!

I am sure similar numbers would work for the Mac OS, but these were all laid out nice and simple for me. Enjoy.

Recent Lite Sides

You Might Be a Computer Geek If..., 06.17. 20 signs that you just might possibly be a computer geek.
What if Apple thought like a PC company?, 11.01. Apple has innovated and blazed its own trail. But what if it had followed the path taken by the PC copycats?
How Microsoft can turn Vista lemons into lemonade, 10.22. How Microsoft could profit by no longer allowing manufacturers to sell new PCs with Windows XP installed.
iPods that never passed beta or focus groups, 09.13. "What most Apple fans don't realize is that there were a few iPod variants that never made it out of beta testing and the focus group stage."
More in the The Lite Side index.

Links for the Day

Mac of the Day: Power Mac G5 Quad, Oct. 2005 - With two 2.5 GHz dual-core G5 CPUs, the G5 Quad was the most powerful PowerPC Mac ever and introduced PCI Express.
Group of the Day: Mac Network deals with all aspects of Mac networking.
November 21 in LEM history: 00: OS upgrades, downgrades - AltiVec vs. Pentium III - 01: Saved by the clones - Computer of the future - 02: Apple Education: Let's get to it - 03: Panther lets Macs and PCs work together, - Lombard SCSI bug - 05: 3 survivors from the 1970s - Real world battery life inadequate - Windows to Mac file transfer with Zip disks - $99 alternative to Microsoft Office - 06: Parallels 1.0 far more polished than beta
Support Low End Mac

Recent Deals

Best eMac Deals, 11.18. Used 1 GHz Combo, $100; SuperDrive, $269; 1.25 GHz Combo, $119; SD, $319; 1.42 GHz Combo, $289; SD, $498.
Best Mac OS X 10.6 and Mac Box Set Deals, 11.18. "Snow Leopard", single user, $25; 5 users, $45; Mac Box Set, single user, $139; 5 users, $180; Server, $414. Shipping included.
Best Xserve Deals, 11.18. Used 1 GHz dual G4, $649; 2.3 dual G5, $795; 3.0 4-core Xeon, $1,899; refurb 2.26 4-core, $2,499; new, $2,888; refurb 8-core, $2,999; new, $3,449; more.
Best 15" MacBook Pro Deals, 11.17. Used 1.83 GHz, $750; 2.16, $800; 2.33, $900; refurb 2.4, $1,299; 2.53, $1,449; 2.66, $1,699; 2.8, $1,899; new 2.53, $1,579; 2.66, $1,799; more.
Best Power Mac G4 and AGP Video Card Deals, 11.17. Used 400 MHz, $50; 933 MHz, $80; 500 dual, $60; 867 dual, $90; 1 GHz dual, $150; 1.25 GHz dual, $225; 1.42 GHz, $499.
Best Mac OS X 10.5 Deals, 11.17. "Leopard" upgrade, $80; single user license, $135; 5 users, $173; Mac Box Set, 5 users, $230; Server, 10 users, $340; unlimited, $850. Shipping included.
Best Mac mini Deals, 11.16. Used 1.42 GHz G4 mini, $379; 1.66 GHz Core Solo, $419; 2.0 Core 2, $450; new 2.26 GHz nVidia, $580; 2.53 GHz, $769; Server, $990.
Best iBook G4 Deals, 11.16. Used 12" 1.07 GHz Combo, $210; 1.33 GHz, $298; 14" 1.33 GHz, $398; 1.42 GHz, $479; SuperDrive, $498.
Best iPod shuffle Deals, 11.16. Used 1 GB, $35; 4 GB, $65; refurb 1 GB, $39; 2 GB, $59; new 2 GB, $55, 4 GB, $75. New and refurb prices include shipping.
More deals in our archive.

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2009 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml.
Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.
Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, iPhone, PowerBook, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.