The Truth About Macs vs. PCs in Our Schools
Dan Knight
- 2002.12.04
Gene Steinberg raises a crucial issue in today's Mac Night Owl
column. In asking the question Can Apple Regain the
Education Market?, Steinberg raises perhaps the biggest
obstacle to Apple's growth in the education market - the Microsoft
monopoly.
We can argue until we're blue in the face about OS stability, ease
of use, out of the box experience, longevity, total cost of ownership,
and most of the other issues without making a dent in Mac resistant
techs, administrators, and board members. While the Mac has advantages
in many areas, these are not the important ones as far as the decision
makers are concerned.
Making the Right Decision
When people make decisions for others, they are usually driven by
their own motives, which include things like job security. They don't
want to be called idiots for making a wrong decision. And for 90% of
the world's computer users, anything other than Windows is a wrong
decision. Period.
Macs may last twice as long, require less technical support, be
easier for students to use, look nicer, and fight tooth decay (okay,
that one's a stretch), but it doesn't matter. Decision makers only care
about a few things in making the safest decision:
- What is the rest of our field doing?
- What are other fields using?
- What has the lowest initial investment?
- What do our techs think?
- Will this decision cost me my position?
But Everybody Is Doing It
Once upon a time, the rest of the education market was Apple. But as
Apple moved from Apple IIs to Macs and industry began adopting DOS and
Windows PCs, the second question became a bigger and bigger factor.
After all, if the whole world is using Windows, why should education be
the odd man out? In fact, businessmen will argue that not
training our children on Windows does the students and the business
community a disservice by not training them for jobs in the real
world.
The cart comes before the horse. A general education becomes
vocational education. And our children learn Microsoft Word,
Excel, and PowerPoint in school instead of word processing,
spreadsheets, and presentations. Over time, the answer to question 1
becomes the same as the answer to question 2.
Short Term Cost
Total cost of ownership, product longevity, and lower support costs
don't mean much when budgets are already stretched to the breaking
point. Like businesses, schools will more readily choose a short-term
solution that saves money up front and balances this year's budget
regardless of the fact that overall long term costs are higher.
We can counter that with all sorts of studies and analysis, but the
school board is more concerned with balancing this year's budget than
with saving money three to five years from now with longer lasting
computers.
The Tech Solution
Apple didn't make a lot of friends among school techs with the iMac.
Sure, it was easy to set up - but have you ever tried to get inside one
of those things to upgrade RAM, replace the hard drive, or swap out a
CD-ROM? Newer models made memory upgrades easier, but the CRT iMac is a
bear to get into.
A lot of these same techs had just come from years of trying to make
the LC x200 series of Road Apples function decently on school
networks, something that simply wasn't going to happen. And before
that, they had to work with the versatile LC 630 series, which was abysmally
difficult to get inside of without somehow mangling the case and making
the faceplate refuse to go back in place.
Yes, Power Macs since the 7500 have been marvelously
accessible, but those aren't the dominant computers in most schools.
And now a lot of schools are adopting iBooks, which apparently make
getting inside the iMac look easy.
If the techs aren't happy - and I've heard from several who are not
- management is going to hear about it. If the techs would rather fix a
Dell or Gateway than an iMac, that's going to count for a lot.
The other factor is that most techs come out of their technical
schools and other training knowing Wintel PCs inside and out. They
graduate with the networking and Wintel certifications in place ready
to support what they know - and very often they don't know Macs.
The more PCs a school system has, the more PC techs, the more pro-PC
bias even without Apple service issues. As someone who spent eight
years supporting Macs, I can tell you that no matter how few PCs vs.
Macs an organization has, the number of PC support persons will always
exceed the number of Mac support staff if there are 3 or more of them.
In fact, because Macs are so reliable, most Mac experts end up spending
most of their time supporting PCs.
Job Security
For the techs themselves, Windows PCs mean job security. The
inexpensive computers schools tend to buy are quite literally cheap,
meaning they are more likely to break, meaning the tech support staff
will grow along with the number of Windows PCs in use.
For administrators and school board members, job security comes from
making the safest decisions. Nobody is going to try to recall the
school board or get the superintendent fired for choosing the lower
cost solution, especially when it better prepares our children for a
future dominated by the Microsoft monopoly.
On the other hand, the Maine iBook decision is constantly coming
under fire as being overpriced and wrong-headed. Would you rather spend
your time fighting that battle or trying to make a whole school system
work?
Mac Benefits
For well-to-do school districts, Macs have the benefit of looking
great in the classroom and in the computer lab. Short-term cost is less
of an issue, and Apple seems to realize that, so they seem to be
targeting schools that can afford the Mac solution. It's the easy
market.
Except for that part of the education market, Apple doesn't know how
to play the game. Decisions are sometimes made for rational reasons -
total cost of ownership - and sometimes for emotional ones - choosing
Windows is safer.
Growing the Apple Education Market
The only way Apple is going to grow their share of the education
market is by going on the offensive. They have to address the concerns
of techs, administrators, and school board members - as well as those
of the local business community that benefits so directly when our
children are trained on Word, Excel, and PowerPoint for Windows.
Total Cost of Ownership
The Mac's strongest benefit is total cost of ownership, and there
are several reasons for it. Macs tend to last a lot longer, tend to be
built more reliably, and require less technical support, making them
less costly on an annualized basis.
However, they are not cheaper to buy, and cash-strapped school
boards are very, very concerned with this year's budget. And the higher
the number of computers being purchased, the harder it is for Apple to
win the bid (if they're even asked to bid).
Some ways Apple could address initial cost vs. TCO:
- Create a lower cost Mac that can compete with the low-cost Windows
PCs they are competing against. This might mean thinking different
about integrated PCs vs. modular design and reducing the number of
parts in the PC (how many RAM sockets or USB ports are needed? do
desktop PCs need AirPort slots?). Do not use less reliable
components.
- Create an educational lease program that includes an extended
warranty for the duration of the lease. If a school system can buy
$100,000 of Apple hardware for $25,000 this year with $25,000 payments
each of the next four years and know that this includes warranty
replacement of failed components, they might bite - and Apple wouldn't
have to design a low-cost Mac that can really compete in the education
market. And Apple makes more money from the lease than from an outright
sale.
- Set up a lease program and create a lower cost educational Mac.
Everybody wins.
The Microsoft Monopoly
That's nothing compared to the cost of addressing the fact that
Windows so dominates the home, education, and business markets. Windows
is ubiquitous. Isn't it a disservice to not teach it to our
children?
No, it's a disservice when we don't expose them to the diversity (a
good buzzword to use around educators) of the computing world. There
are other word processing, spreadsheet, and presentation solutions.
There are other operating systems. If we really want to prepare our
children for the workplace of tomorrow, Windows 3.1, 98, or XP is
inadequate. By the time they graduate, Microsoft will have reinvented
Windows yet again.
To adequately train our children for the workplace - assuming that
is even the goal of our school systems - we should expose them to Palms
and Pocket PCs and Linux boxen and Macs. Although these don't have the
market of Windows, these are the operating systems that point to where
Windows will be in a few years. This will also teach our children how
to adapt to different platforms, rather than locking them into a single
computing experience.
(That's right, I am not promoting Macs as the only systems in our
schools. Our kids need to be exposed to Windows, and for a lot of Mac
users, that isn't going to happen at home.)
No operating system left behind? ;-)
The Right Choice
In the end, until those who make and implement technology decisions
see a real reason to consider anything but Windows, Apple has lost the
battle. Sites like Should Our Schools -
or Anybody Else - Have Macs or PCs? are a great resource once we
have opened their minds (another phrase dear to educators) to the
possibility of something besides Windows, but not until them.
"Don't confuse us with facts. We've already made our decision."
Apple's War
Frankly, this is Apple's war, and they seem very selective about
which battles they will fight. They love the well-funded districts with
broadband Internet that don't balk at the initial cost of Apple
hardware. Maybe they are content with those districts and a few
statewide initiatives.
Or maybe Apple is hungry enough fight for a growing presence in
every school and every school district. The people who gave us the Mac,
the 1984 and lemmings ads, the iMac, "Think Different," Apple retail
stores, and the switch campaign obviously have the creative resources
to become a dominant force in such an important market.
People like Steve Wood, John Droz Jr, Jeff Adkins, myself, and countless others have
done our part. We have fought a holding action. We have sometimes been
subversive. We have won now and again. We have tried to stem the tide.
And we are tired of doing it without Apple's help.
Apple, this is your war. Plan it, fund it, fight it, and win it.
Commit to offering the best education solution for the dollar. Enough
bombing runs on big targets. We need a Normandy invasion.
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- World Book Encyclopedia 2012 DVD, Tommy Thomas, Reviews, 2013.03.05.
"You may be asking yourself, in an age of Wikipedia and instant information, is World Book still relevant?"
- Vintage Computer Festival SouthEast, April 20-21, 2013, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.25.
Old Apple gear and old PCs.
Latest Deals on Low End Mac
