Following is Charles W. Moore's syndicated newspaper
column from last Friday.
In Streets of Laredo, the second of Larry McMurtry's quartet of
Lonesome Dove novels, a muy malo dude named Joey Garza stocks
South Texas and the Mexican borderlands, picking off people with a
high-powered German rifle fitted with a telescopic sight.
McMurtry's Old West novels are an odd - albeit often entertaining -
mixture of postmodern nihilism, Grand Guignol excess, extreme violence,
and cameo appearances by historical characters, populated with flawed
heroes and villains so evil the reader is fervently wishing them dead
long before the usually bloody climax of the story in the late
chapters.
I seriously doubt that there was anyone like Joey Garza
serial-sniping with a scope-equipped rifle in the Texas of the 1890s,
but there is certainly one such individual stalking the environs of
Washington D.C. this October. Such moral monsters are a product of our
morally adrift culture, not the Catholic culture of Mexico and Latino
Texas a century ago.
Larry McMurtry loosely weaves historical threads throughout his
yarns, but one glaring omission is the almost total absence of
reference to Christianity or religious faith of any sort in his books.
Whether this blind spot is deliberate or unintentional, I cannot say,
but it's probably not a coincidence that McMurtry's background is in
Hollywood screenwriting, a field where Christian faith is mostly
ignored, or, when occasionally referenced, usually slandered and
ridiculed. That obliviousness and contempt for religion in
entertainment culture is not coincidental to the post modern nihilism
that dominates popular culture nowadays, which in turn is the culture
that has produced Washington's sniper.
Postmodern culture is, in the context of our society, post-Christian
culture. It is marked by the poisonous notion that morality is
relative, that there are no absolutes, and that nothing can be truly
known. Its only creed is that of indiscriminate tolerance of virtually
anything except any sort of moral absolutism or definitive
truth-claims.
And it is no surprise or coincidence that such a climate of moral
anarchy can create amoral predators like the evil individual blowing
away folks in Washington while they gas up their cars, clip their
hedges, or arrive at school.
Civilization did not derive from "the goodness of individual human
spirits" working in harmony for the common good, as humanist dogma
would have us believe. It is dependent upon honouring the objective
moral laws of the created order and in acknowledgment of the
sovereignty and authority of God.
The father of modern and postmodern moral-relativism, Friedrich
Nietzsche, asserted that man creates his own values, and that
the codes of good and evil affirmed by various cultures derive from the
longings and strivings of human will - not divine revelation, objective
truth, or even reason. However, Nietzsche was more intellectually
honest than today's liberal humanists, who imagine that they can retain
quasi-Christian social morality without reference to its source. If
Christian faith was to be denied, Nietzsche maintained, then Christian
morality must also be spurned. And without Christian morality and its
demand for personal accountability, all hell breaks loose.
Western civilization bloomed with the Christian religion, was
sustained by it for some 1,500 years, and is withering with
Christianity's popular decline and loss of cultural purchase. It's
probably fair to say that most people never lived strictly by Christian
values, but in the past a majority affirmed them as the benchmark of
right and wrong, good and evil.
Carl
Jung warned that there would be hell to pay if the cultural
ethical consensus ever broke down. In 1911, Jung wrote:
"Today the individual still feels himself restrained by public
hypocritical opinion, and therefore, prefers to lead a secret, separate
life, but publicly to represent morality. It might be different if men
in general all at once found the moral mask too dull, and if they
realized how dangerously their [inner] beasts lie in wait for each
other, and then truly a frenzy of demoralization might sweep over
humanity."
Sweeping it is, into a moral and philosophical vacuum created by the
compound effect of three or four generations now who have "found the
moral mask too dull," discarded Christian ethics, and embraced
positivist humanism's false claims that good and evil are merely
matters of opinion. Christian-based moral authority is now disdained,
leaving only the criminal-justice system and the ideological tyranny of
leftist political correctness attempting to hold a reactionary line
against social breakdown.
As W.B. Yeats so prophetically observed:
"Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
are full of passionate intensity."
Secular humanists suppose you can maintain civilization without
objective moral or religious standards. I disbelieve this, and there's
more evidence all the time confirming my skepticism. Without moral
order there can be no political or social order - or genuine
freedom.
Civilizations end this way.
There's nothing free or civilized about being afraid to go to the
supermarket because some depraved lunatic might take you out in the
parking lot with a random shot.
