LA Computer Company: Specials on AppleCare, iMac's, Apple Batteries and Apple A/C Adapters. Also Great prices on Used Apple Computers. Call 1-800-941-7654 Click Here.
OWC: Upgrade to a Larger Hard Drive, Add Additional Drives SATA for Mac Pro and G5s, up to 1.0TB in each Bay. 500GB from $90!
My Turn is Low End Mac's column for reader-submitted
articles. It's your turn to share your thoughts on all things
Mac (or iPhone, iPod, etc.) and write for the Mac web. Email your
submission to Dan Knight
.
Let's start with the Megahertz Myth today. You've gotta have the
fastest processor possible, right? Sure, we know that an
867 MHz G4 is faster than a
1.7 GHz Pentium 4. And as long as you have the fastest Mac around,
you're golden, right?
There is always a bottleneck when talking about performance. The
time it takes you to get to work is one example. The bottleneck is
that place on the freeway just before the old bridge where the road
goes from five lanes down to three.
On your G4, is the CPU the bottleneck? At 867 MHz, it's the
fastest part of the computer!
How about the RAM. Obviously, we have level two and level three
cache because the motherboard RAM is so slow. Maybe we should start
using DDR (Double Data Rate) SDRAM in Macs to increase the speed. It
takes the computer 7 nanoseconds or so to access RAM. What a
tremendously long time!
Or maybe access time isn't what we should be looking at. PC133 is
64 bits wide and runs at 133 MHz; that means 1064 MBps throughput.
1.04 gigabytes per second? If you have enough hard disk space to make
that an issue, you may also own BMW.
That gives me an idea - how about the hard drive?
Lets face it, the hard drive is the slowest part of a personal
computer. With access times around 8 milliseconds, it takes
the computer 1000 times longer to access the hard disk than RAM.
While the G4 ships with ATA66 and boasts of 66 MBps throughput, it
rarely breaks 35-40 MBps.
Maybe we should ship the next G4 with ATA100 disks? Maybe even
ATA133 disks? There are rumors that the current G4s are capable of
running at those speeds, but Apple has nothing to say on this.
I have a much better idea: SCSI.
Why SCSI? Ultra320 SCSI is almost ready for consumer use. That's a
potential 320 megabytes per second. I realize that today's drives
aren't quite capable of those speeds, but 15,000 rpm drives are
available with access times under 4 milliseconds.
"SCSI is so expensive," you scream. "SCSI is just for digital
video people and graphic designers. Don't you ever read PC
World?"
No, I do not read PC World. This is because I think
different(ly).
Once upon a time disk reads and writes were done a lot less than
they are now. I remember getting taught to save my documents every 15
minutes, which seemed like a ludicrously short period of time. Now I
save every three or four minutes. Saving data on floppy disks took
forever, so it wasn't done much. On the Windows side of things,
multitasking wasn't even available until 1995 (at least not in any
meaningful way), so you would usually just save what you were working
on.
Things have changed with the Web.
Every time you look at a Web page, your computer accesses your
hard drive. It saves data in a cache, because your hard drive is
faster than you Web connection. If you use an instant messaging
program, they probably save logs and history files. Every time you
get a new email, your disk is active. With multitasking, sometimes
you can be opening one program while your email is downloading and
someone is sending you an ICQ message. This means a lot of disk
access, akin to rush hour at the aforementioned bridge.
And that's exactly where SCSI beats IDE. SCSI drives are
intelligent, meaning they can process an instruction and let the CPU
get back to work. IDE drives require a lot more CPU time, which isn't
a big problem if you're running one task at a time, but becomes a
problem when you run a multitasking operating system like Mac
OS X. The intelligent SCSI bus even lets devices communicate
directly, so one drive can send data to another drive without tying
up the CPU.
Graphic designers and digital video experts have relied on SCSI
for the speed they need, but disk usage in other areas has increased.
With more demands on the drive, there are more reasons than ever to
use SCSI.
The processor in my Blue G3/450
is good enough for me. Sure, a G4 would be nice, but I would rather
have a few 10,000 rpm Ultra2Wide SCSI drives than an 867 MHz G4
processor.
Andrew W. Hill (a.k.a. Aqua) has been using Macintosh computers since
1987 and maintains that the Mac
SE is the perfect Macintosh, superior to all - including the
Color Classic. He is on the
verge of being evicted from the family home due to its infestation of
Macs (last count: about 50). Andrew is attempting to pay his way
through college at UC Santa Cruz with freelance Web design and Mac
tech support.
Further Reading
SCSI &
IDE: Overview and Comparison, Markus Westergren & Mattias
Sandgren, 1998 (revised). Good tech overview. Summary: With a
single device, SCSI vs. IDE makes no real difference. However,
SCSI is superior when multiple devices are used because "The ATA
devices lacks the intelligence to perform command queuing like
their SCSI counterparts...."
IDE vs. SCSI,
David Risley, PC Mechanic, 2001.03.25. "SCSI is a smarter bus than
IDE. There are many steps in the SCSI data transfer. But, on OSes
that allow multitasking, or if you often use several programs at
once, the SCSI drive is a better choice because this extra
intelligence of the SCSI bus is used. "The performance overhead of SCSI over IDE comes from
structure of the bus, not the drive. The nature of the SCSI bus
allows it much better performance when doing data hungry tasks
such as multi-tasking. The SCSI bus controller is capable of
controlling the drives without any work by the processor."
IDE or
SCSI Disk, H. Gilbert, Introduction to PC Hardware, 1998
(revised). "SCSI is worth the extra cost in a Server. EIDE
supports two separate I/O operations to two disks (on the two
different interface cables). SCSI allows all of the disk devices
to be active simultaneously."
Share your perspective on the Mac by emailing with "My Turn" as your subject.
Recent My Turn articles
Using Low End Macs for Internet Radio, 08.18.
When the local public radio station moved classical music to HD radio, it was time to find another way to listen. An old iMac with iTunes solved the problem.
'That's Not a Computer', 07.30.
Salvaging a broken PowerBook by turning it into a desktop computer.
My 4 favorite PowerBooks, 05.28.
The PowerBook 150 has a big screen for a vintage PowerBook, the 165c has color, the 100 is diminutive, and Lombard has USB and a great keyboard.
Mac of the Day: DayStar Genesis, Oct. 1995 - The first 'Mac' with multiple processors, technology Daystar licensed to Apple.
List of the Day: SuperMacs is for those using Umax SuperMac clones.
October 6 in LEM history: 98: USB is a good thing - Can Apple save Emailer? - 99: Kihei iMacs - 00: Advice about PDS Power Macs - 03: A replacement PowerBook battery - 04: AirPort Express - 05: The Apple Lisa story - 06: Don't ignore battery recall - Use any networked computer as an additional Mac display
Getting the Most from Your G3 Mac, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 10.03.
Most G3 Macs can be upgraded so they can run Mac OS X 10.4 'Tiger' quite nicely. Here's how.
Best Power Mac G4 and AGP Video Card Deals, Low End Mac Deals, 10.03.
Used 450 MHz, $75; 500, $99; 733, $150; 800, $199; 1.25 GHz, C$349; 867 MHz dual, $225; 1 GHz, $349; 1.25, $499; 1.42, $600.
Best iBook G3 Deals, Low End Mac Deals, 10.03.
Used 300 MHz clamshell, $150; 366, $199; 500 CD, $149; 800, $190; 600 CD-RW, $240; 800 Combo, $300; 900, $399; 14" 600, $360; 900, $469.
Best Mac OS X 10.0-10.3 Deals, Low End Mac Deals, 10.03.
Mac OS X 10.0.3, $30; 10.1, $20; 10.2, $60; 10.3 CD, DVD, $100; CD, $119; 10.1 Server, unlimited users, $65; 10.3 Server, unlimited, $150.
The Best Browsers for Older Macs Running Tiger, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 10.02.
A dial-up user's overview of browsers for Mac OS X 10.4 puts the emphasis on reliability, downloads, and speed.
CodeWeavers Brings Google's Chrome Browser to Intel Macs, Alan Zisman, Zis Mac, 10.02.
Google's new Chrome browser uses separate processes for each tab and brings other changes to Windows users. Now Mac fans can try it as well.
Best MacBook Deals, Low End Mac Deals, 10.02.
Used 1.83 GHz, $649; 2.0 SD, $750; refurb 2.1 GHz, $899; 2.4, $1,099; black, $1,299; new 2.1, $1,019 after rebate; 2.4, $1,204 a/r; black, $1,394 a/r.
Best iMac G5 Deals, Low End Mac Deals, 10.02.
Used 17" 1.6 GHz Combo, $450; 2.0 SuperDrive, $500; 1.9 iSight, $625; 20" 1.8 GHz, $550; 2.0, $600; 2.1 iSight, $650.
Best iPod touch Deals, Low End Mac Deals, 10.02.
Used 1G/8 GB, $160; refurb, $179; new, $198; used 16, $200; refurb, $219; new, $265; refurb 32, $319; new, $345; 2G/8 GB, $229; 16, $280; 32, $380.
Best Intel iMac Deals, Low End Mac Deals, 10.01.
Used 17" 1.83 GHz, $625; 20", $599; 2.16, $749; 24", $950; refurb 20" 2.0, $949; 2.4, $999; 2.66, $1,299; 24" 2.4, $1,299; 2.8, $1,549; 3.06, $1,899; rebates on new.
Best 15" PowerBook G4 Deals, Low End Mac Deals, 10.01.
Used 1.25 GHz Combo, $560; 1.33, $580; 1.5, $596;, 1.67 SuperDrive, $690; hi-res, $800.
Best Apple TV Deals, Low End Mac Deals, 10.01.
Refurb 40 GB Apple TV, $199; new, $224; refurb 160 GB, $279; new, $322 - prices include ground shipping.
All of our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For
price quotes and advertising information, please contact
at BackBeat Media
(646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.
Problems viewing this page with Internet Explorer
5.5 or 6? It works fine in other browsers, including IE 7. We
recommend Firefox
for those using Windows, as it is standards based and more
secure than IE 6 (and earlier). More LEM visitors use Firefox
than any other browser.
