Low End Mac Reader Specials

TypeStyler For Mac OS X is Now Shipping! Download The Free Fully Functional 60 Day Tryout at www.typestyler.com

Poker Mac Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker application such as Full Tilt Poker Mac.

Compare products like desktop computers, apple laptops, apple macs, and LCD Monitors side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for new mobile phones, sat nav systems, or MP3 players. The Ciao online shopping community makes searching products easy for you.

Low End Mac's Online Tech Journal

AltiVec vs. Pentium III

A Little Bad Math Goes a Long Way

Dan Knight - 2000.11.21

If there's one thing that gets my goat, it's bad math and statistics.

In Gauging the Gigaflops Gap, Don Granberry of ZDNet tries to explain how the G4 with AltiVec is superior to the Pentium III. It's actually a fairly accessible explanation, but the numbers are flawed.

Granberry uses the following table to compare a 700 MHz PIII with a 500 MHz G4:

It's a nice table. It's clearly labeled. The facts are clearly established. But there's one piece of misleading data: CPU speed doesn't mean a thing when you're looking at how many clock cycles are used.

MHz for MHz, the G4 is 3.68 times more efficient at these particular functions (or, as Granberry puts it, the G4 does the same work in 27% as many processor cycles).

This wouldn't be a problem, except that later in the article he links clock speed to this. Which wouldn't be a problem, except that he doesn't apply the same clock speed to both processors.

Multiplying 3.68 by 700 MHz, Granberry states that a 2.6 GHz Pentium III would match the performance of a G4/500 on these tests - but it just isn't so.

The problem is the misleading data (remember how story problems would sometimes introduce numbers that were not necessary to solve the problem?) brought him to the wrong number. No matter how precise the math, if you're multiplying the wrong number, you get the wrong result.

Instead of 2,576 MHz, he should have multiplied 3.68 by 500 MHz, resulting in a Pentium III running at 1,840 MHz to match the G4/500's performance on these particular functions.

Of course, Apple is now shipping the Power Mac G4/500 in a dual-processor configuration, so it would take 3,680 Pentium III MHz to match it. For the sake of convenience, let's say a quad-processor PIII/900 system would match the dual-processor G4/500 on these vector functions.

Whether this means much in the real world is another question entirely, but at least we have the math right. LEM

Recent Online Tech Journal Columns

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Custom Search

Amazon.com

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Video Cards
Email Lists

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum

DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ

Abandonware
   Petition

Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
B&H
MacMall
TechRestore
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Low End Mac's Amazon.com store

Advertise

Open Link