Copycat Samsung Should Have Known Better
Samsung isn't the first company to be stung when it has copied too closely. Many companies follow the lead that someone else set, because that is where consumer attention is focused. Like others before them, they believed that adding a few small details will be enough to protect them.
Unfortunately for Samsung, it is big enough to know better and should have been better prepared, since Apple has a huge reputation for litigation. Apple's own website has a huge list of trademarks that it owns. The only thing missing is a clear statement that Apple will attack you to the full extent of the law if you put a single toe across the line.
Apple and Samsung may have had a good vendor/customer relationship with Apple buying Samsung components. As Samsung started moving its product design to match Apple, let's just say friendship ends when money is on the line. It was obvious from day one that an Android tablet would compete directly with the iPad, and there is no pretending that Apple would ignore it.
Many people have been making hay out of the injunction on Samsung's Galaxy tablet in Europe. These people are blinded by the popularity of the iPad design as being the only option (see iPad Trade Dress Ruling in Europe Won't End Tablet Competition). They are underreporting the importance of the look of a product for the name brand company.
We all see trademarks everyday and understand them a little. We have Tylenol for headaches, Ford for cars, and Google for web search. Beyond trademarks, anything about a product can make it distinctive and recognizable. Thinks of the Golden Arches used by McDonald's, the shape of a Coca-Cola bottle, or the blue diamond shape of a Viagra pill. These distinctive visual clues are protected by trade dress laws, which are part of the overall trademark laws.
Imagine if Burger King started putting up Golden Arches outside its restaurants. McDonald's wouldn't be happy, and a few customers would drive up expecting to get a Big Mac. Stealing the Golden Arches is just as bad as taking the trademark McDonald's name and using it on your own restaurant. (Unless you are in China, where no one will notice, at least for awhile.)
We now know that those crazy Europeans allowed Apple to create a trade dress over the look of the iPad but think we'd be too smart for that here in the US. Wrong, we have similar laws here, and the Supreme Court has this to say about trade dress: "almost anything at all that is capable of carrying meaning" as a "symbol" or "device", terms used to define trademarks in The Lanham Act.
The US gives the same kinds of protection as Europe, and the battle with Samsung could impact imports here just as easily.
Are these are just frivolous lawsuits by Apple to unfairly block Samsung from the market? Not hardly! We can look at a similar case between two other companies to see what is at stake. In the case of McNeil vs. Granutec, Granutec was selling a capsule that looked a lot like Tylenol.
Tylenol's patented color scheme.
Tylenol was a red and yellow, and so was Granutec's generic equivalent. McNeil thought they were too similar, after all with all the possible color choices(e.g., red/green, blue/yellow, red/white, etc.) there was no reason to use red/yellow except to match Tylenol.
The Court found the following:
II. Irreparable Harm to the Plaintiff and Injury to the Defendant
In the OTC drug market, brand loyalty is not a small matter, and OTC drugs are not small business. In the gelcap's first full year on the market, McNeil spent forty million dollars on consumer advertising - primarily in an effort to regain the loyalty the Tylenol brand lost when its capsules were tampered with. McNeil's Prop. findings of Fact and Concl. of Law at 13. The red and [*204] yellow capsule-shaped gelcap thereafter became McNeil's top selling Tylenol product.
Because of the history behind the Tylenol gelcap, e.g., the tampering incidents with the capsule and the subsequent marketing blitz for the gelcap, Granutec's copying of the gelcap's shape, texture, and color combination is particularly troublesome to McNeil. McNeil has taken great pains in the last seven years to regain public confidence in the Tylenol name, and the Tylenol gelcap appears to have obtained strong name brand recognition and quite a large following. To permit Granutec to indistinguishably copy McNeil's red and yellow gelcap not only allows Granutec to benefit from Tylenol's name brand recognition and faithful following, but also takes [**15] away McNeil's control over its reputation and goodwill.
There can be no doubt that Apple spends just as much on advertising the iPad as McNeil did for Tylenol. And if Samsung's tablet is too similar to the iPad, then brand recognition and faithful following is not something they should be allowed to take away from Apple.
There are millions of possible changes that Samsung could have made - different color, edge details, contours, raised surfaces, buttons, bezels, etc. A more thought out design could have distinguished Samsung's product from the iPad. Apple is not to blame in this situation.
Samsung can easily fix the problem with a few changes. It will cost time and money, but they will soon be back on the market. While some may think its not possible, Samsung could even come up with a better design that gets Apple imitating it. Sure, this isn't likely given their copycat attitude, but it is possible.
Recent Stop the Noiz Columns
- The iPad mini Is Designed for Apple Users, Not Kindle or Nexus Switchers, 2012.11.02. The $329 iPad mini isn't designed to compete with Android tablets. It's meant for Mac, iPhone, iPod, and iTunes users - and new tablet buyers.
- Apple's Real Problem with Samsung, 2012.10.31. It's hard for Apple to trust Samsung as a supplier when Samsung is competing in the smartphone and tablet space.
- Which Is Apple's Biggest Threat, Microsoft or Google?, 2012.10.30. Most people think Apple and Microsoft compete against each other, but that's not exactly true.
- More in the Stop the Noiz index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Power Mac 9500, introduced 1995.05.01. The first PCI Power Mac has 6 slots, speeds of 120 and 132 MHz.
- June 18 in LEM history: 99: Is the iMac passé? - 01: Not all Mac-heads are lefties - Pitfalls of Freenets - 03: Impressions of a low-end eMac - 04: iTunes Europe: Where are the indies? - 07: Tiger users will be able to run up-to-date apps - 08: Old Mac restoration
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- World Book Encyclopedia 2012 DVD, Tommy Thomas, Reviews, 2013.03.05. "You may be asking yourself, in an age of Wikipedia and instant information, is World Book still relevant?"
- Vintage Computer Festival SouthEast, April 20-21, 2013, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.25. Old Apple gear and old PCs.
- iMessage: The Ultimate Messaging Service?, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.21. In most ways, Apple's iMessage is far superior to BlackBerry Messenger.
- More links in our archive.
- Best Mac mini Deals
- Best 13" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Intel iMac Deals
- Best iPod touch Deals
- Best iPhone Deals
- Best iPod nano Deals
- Best iPod classic Deals
- Best Apple TV Prices
- More deals in our archive.
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Mac Driver Museum
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ