Vintage Mac Living

MacBook Pro: What's Up with Bumping the Speed When Apple Can't Even Meet Demand?

- 2006.02.16

Five weeks after Apple announced the new Intel-based MacBook Pro, they've already upped the speed and introduced a new model.

The MacBook Pro has begun shipping in 1.83, 2.0, and 2.16 GHz configurations. The first two are the same price as the previously announced 1.67 and 1.83 GHz models. The 2.16 GHz model is a build-to-order upgrade for the 2.0 GHz model that costs a whopping $300 more!

I have two problems with the new models:

Apple is having a hard enough time getting the models they had out the door because Intel can't supply CPUs quickly enough, yet they decide to drop the 1.67 GHz speed and introduce 2.0 GHz and 2.16 GHz speeds (that won't ship to new customers for 3 to 4 weeks).
The 2.16 GHz model. Who in their right mind is going to pay $300 for 160 MHz of additional processing power in this day and age?

What is Apple thinking? They couldn't even get the ones they announced out the door and have a backlog of orders. Are the faster CPUs going to be more readily available than the slower ones? Why replace models you can't ship with models you're going to have an even harder time shipping?

It doesn't make sense.

Overpriced 2.16 GHz MacBook Pro

And what's with the 2.16 GHz model?

Some of you might recall the days of the Sawtooth G4. The 450 MHz model was released at US$2,499, and the 500 MHz model was announced at $3,499. That was 40% more money for 11% more speed.

But this is different. The only change is processor speed.

With the top-end Sawtooth you not only got an 11% power boost for your extra $1,000, you also got 128 MB of additional RAM (twice as much), 7 GB more hard drive space (35% more), and an upgrade from a DVD-ROM drive to a DVD-RAM drive.

Sure, the new 2.16 GHz MacBook Pro is a bit faster than the 2.0 GHz model, but is it really worth an extra $300?

A Better Way to Spend $300

I have a hard time giving away a 300 MHz machine these days, so why would anyone pay $300 extra to make their new laptop 160 MHz faster?

If you're thinking about buying the new top of the line 2.16 GHz MacBook Pro, don't. It's simply not worth it to get about 8% more processing power for 12% more dollars.

If you think it is, email me at tedahodges (at) yahoo (dot) com and tell me why.

A better choice might be to take your hard earned $300, buy a Blue & White G3 or a Sawtooth G4, put Mac OS 9 and VNC on it, and run your Classic apps remotely from your new MacBook Pro, since the Intel Macs don't support Classic.

Link: That Extra 10%, Dan Knight, Mac Musings, 1998.10.24

Join us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, use our Google+ page, or read our RSS news feed

Recent Vintage Mac Living articles

What a waste! Some schools would rather store old computers than put them to use, 2007.09.12. Denver Public Schools is one example of a school district so ready to buy new computers that it has tens of thousands of old, usable computers sitting in storage.
My incredible $110 Lombard and Power Mac G4 deal, 2007.07.11. Sometimes pawn shops can be a great source for older Macs, such as turning up a Lombard PowerBook and a very upgraded Power Mac G4 Digital Audio for just $110!
Too stressed to even think about computers, 2007.05.16. "I've been so preoccupied that I haven't been able to think about computers, much less write about them."
More in the Vintage Mac Living index.

Links for the Day

Mac of the Day: PowerBook 165c, introduced 1993.02.10. The first color PowerBook had an attractive screen, slow graphics.
May 25 in LEM history: 99: OS X and the econoMac - iMac iMpact - 00: Is a Mac better than a PC? - 01: 1993: PowerBook vs. ThinkPad - Old files on a new Mac - 05: Mac minis in classroom a big hit - Of mice and keyboards - 06: The best 'Book for my needs - 07: More RAM vs. matched RAM - Running OS X from flash memory
Support Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Vintage Mac Living articles copyright ©2005-07 by Ted Hodges. Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Opinions expressed are those of their authors and may not reflect the opinion of Cobweb Publishing. Advice is presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all.
Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2013 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc. unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Low End Mac, LowEndMac, and lowendmac.com are trademarks of Cobweb Publishing Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iPad, iPhone, iMac, iPod, MacBook, Mac Pro, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.
Please report errors to .
LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Email may be published at our discretion unless marked "not for publication"; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it, and we don't share the information we have with others. For more details, see our Terms of Use.