Low End Mac Reader Specials

TypeStyler For Mac OS X is Now Shipping! Download The Free Fully Functional 60 Day Tryout at www.typestyler.com

OWC: Get the Right Memory for Your Mac Top Quality, Competitive Price, Lifetime Backed Free Expert Support + Installation Videos too! MacBook & mini 8GB, iMac 16GB, Mac Pro up to 32GB. Click here

Poker Mac Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker application such as Full Tilt Poker Mac.

Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.

Compare products like desktop computers, apple laptops, apple macs, and LCD Monitors side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for new mobile phones, sat nav systems, or MP3 players. The Ciao online shopping community makes searching products easy for you.

The Lite Side

Benchmarks to Convince Pundits that Macs are Faster

- 2003.07.01

In a flurry of articles, writers across the Web are finding issue with the recently released benchmarks for Apple's new Power Mac G5.

I've read all of these (ignoring all the parts too technical for a mere Mac user to understand) and come up with a summary of all the things Apple would have to do to prove to the Wintel world that Macs are truly faster. Apparently, double the speed on Quake, Photoshop, and Mathematica just isn't enough; when you're in the minority, you have to do everything twice a good just to stay even in the game . . . uh, wait a minute.

Anyway, here is the Lite Side's

Benchmarks to Finally Convince Wintel Pundits that Macs are Faster

First, we'll have to level the playing field by letting each company write its own compiler, making the results essentially unique to each machine and not comparable across platforms. The pundits say that Apple cheated.

Solution: To convince the Wintel Pundits, the Mac group has to write their compiler in the dark, using only their left hands, in less than 30 minutes. The Dell group, not operating under a time limit, must be twice as large as the Mac group and get free donuts for life. Then, if the Mac is faster, we'll know it isn't because Apple cheated on the benchmarks.

Second, to be fair, shouldn't we compare the latest Wintel hardware to Apple's prototypes? The Pundits weigh in, "Isn't it unfair that Apple used a non-shipping machine while Dell's machine wasn't even using the newest 3.2 GHz P4?"

Solution: When a year-old Mac can beat a prototype Wintel machine just off the design table, then maybe the Wintel Pundits will admit Macs are fast. Maybe.

What about other non-Intel processors? Where are the Athlon benchmarks? The pundits respond that Athlon kicks Intel's butt, and now you know why Apple ignores the Athlon.

Solution: Wintel pundits will only admit Macs are fast when Macs are faster than every other computer in existence. No exceptions! Including distributed computing networks and supercomputer facilities with massive parallel processors. Get on that, willya Steve?

What about the fact that in the Photoshop, Mathematica, and Quake bake-offs, the Mac outperformed the PC by a factor of two? The Pundits respond, "Stand back, ye puny mortal, whilst I wield my mighty shield of Altivex."

Solution: When the Mac is designed to allow AltiVec to run backwards, making everything that calls on it twice as slow as when it is activated - and the Mac is still faster than the PC - then maybe we'll hear the end of this.

But Mathematica and Quake aren't optimized for AltiVec, are they? The Pundits respond, "Stand back, ye puny mortal, whilst I wield my mighty shield of technobabble. GCC! SPEC! Compiler! Hyperthreading!"

Solution: As we all know from Star Trek, the only thing that defeats technobabble is . . . more technobabble! We need to introduce these guys to a plasma leak right quick.

In conclusion, this will bang around the office for a while, but when early production models arrive, it'll resurface as we see some real-world benchmarks. Wintel Pundits will not believe these benchmarks until they can talk their powers that be into providing a test machine.

Look at it this way: If the Mac is slower, they get kudos from the publishers of their respective rags (Apple lies about benchmarks! Turn to page 11). If the Mac really is faster, they get the world's fastest computer to play with. It's a win-win scenario.

Put simply: If Apple wants Wintel Pundits to provide an "unbiased" point of view, a few early prototypes sent to the review departments of various PC magazines wouldn't hurt.

Recent Lite Sides

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Custom Search

Amazon.com

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Video Cards
Email Lists

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum

DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ

Abandonware
   Petition

Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
B&H
MacMall
TechRestore
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Advertise

Open Link