Donate ·
Amazon.com · MacResQ
· Advertise
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
Quicklinks: · Power Macs · 'Books · Early Macs · Week's Best Deals · Best Buys · OS Downloads |
Home > Editorial > The Lite Side
|
I've read all of these (ignoring all the parts too technical for a mere Mac user to understand) and come up with a summary of all the things Apple would have to do to prove to the Wintel world that Macs are truly faster. Apparently, double the speed on Quake, Photoshop, and Mathematica just isn't enough; when you're in the minority, you have to do everything twice a good just to stay even in the game . . . uh, wait a minute.
Anyway, here is the Lite Side's
First, we'll have to level the playing field by letting each company write its own compiler, making the results essentially unique to each machine and not comparable across platforms. The pundits say that Apple cheated.
Solution: To convince the Wintel Pundits, the Mac group has to write their compiler in the dark, using only their left hands, in less than 30 minutes. The Dell group, not operating under a time limit, must be twice as large as the Mac group and get free donuts for life. Then, if the Mac is faster, we'll know it isn't because Apple cheated on the benchmarks.
Second, to be fair, shouldn't we compare the latest Wintel hardware to Apple's prototypes? The Pundits weigh in, "Isn't it unfair that Apple used a non-shipping machine while Dell's machine wasn't even using the newest 3.2 GHz P4?"
Solution: When a year-old Mac can beat a prototype Wintel machine just off the design table, then maybe the Wintel Pundits will admit Macs are fast. Maybe.
What about other non-Intel processors? Where are the Athlon benchmarks? The pundits respond that Athlon kicks Intel's butt, and now you know why Apple ignores the Athlon.
Solution: Wintel pundits will only admit Macs are fast when Macs are faster than every other computer in existence. No exceptions! Including distributed computing networks and supercomputer facilities with massive parallel processors. Get on that, willya Steve?
What about the fact that in the Photoshop, Mathematica, and Quake bake-offs, the Mac outperformed the PC by a factor of two? The Pundits respond, "Stand back, ye puny mortal, whilst I wield my mighty shield of Altivex."
Solution: When the Mac is designed to allow AltiVec to run backwards, making everything that calls on it twice as slow as when it is activated - and the Mac is still faster than the PC - then maybe we'll hear the end of this.
But Mathematica and Quake aren't optimized for AltiVec, are they? The Pundits respond, "Stand back, ye puny mortal, whilst I wield my mighty shield of technobabble. GCC! SPEC! Compiler! Hyperthreading!"
Solution: As we all know from Star Trek, the only thing that defeats technobabble is . . . more technobabble! We need to introduce these guys to a plasma leak right quick.
In conclusion, this will bang around the office for a while, but when early production models arrive, it'll resurface as we see some real-world benchmarks. Wintel Pundits will not believe these benchmarks until they can talk their powers that be into providing a test machine.
Look at it this way: If the Mac is slower, they get kudos from the publishers of their respective rags (Apple lies about benchmarks! Turn to page 11). If the Mac really is faster, they get the world's fastest computer to play with. It's a win-win scenario.
Put simply: If Apple wants Wintel Pundits to provide an "unbiased" point of view, a few early prototypes sent to the review departments of various PC magazines wouldn't hurt.
Entire Low End Mac website copyright
©1997-2008 by Cobweb
Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.
Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work
for all. Please report errors to
.
LINKS: We allow and encourage
links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear
within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml.
Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses
will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them
in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your
message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters
may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
PRIVACY: We don't collect
personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more
details, see our Terms of Use.
Low End Mac is an independent
publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise
approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh,
iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, iPhone, PowerBook, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac
Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of
Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may
be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.
Our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For detailed price quotes and advertising information, please contactat BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.
