3 MacMice Mice Compared: 2 Winners, 1 Loser
Preference in computer pointing devices is a subjective, idiosyncratic thing. There is no objective "best" mouse - it's what you find most comfortable and supportive of productivity. Most people use mice, but some prefer trackballs or trackpads, and then there are roller bars.
I check out a lot of pointing devices for product previews - and most have their relative virtues and some weaknesses - but for my own production work, I tend to use a mouse most of the time, and for the past three years or so, it has most often been a MacMice product.
My introduction to MacMice mice was the company's original "The Mouse", an 800 dpi resolution device with an LED optical tracking sensor and a pretty conventional form factor quite similar to that of Apple's original USB "Pro" optical mouse. What impressed me most about The Mouse from the get-go was its silky-smooth feel and tracking, which were the best I had ever experienced in a computer mouse.
The Mouse glides smoothly and almost effortlessly on my mousepad, thanks to its light weight and MacMice's very effective proprietary "glide pads." I also thought The Mouse's clear plastic base glowing red when the LED sensor was activated was a cool (albeit totally aesthetic) touch.
But it was mainly the feel of The Mouse that appealed to me. No fancy ergonomic gimmicks - just an attractive and comfortable conventional shape and light effort, along with a smooth, "clickless" scroll wheel and soft action mouse buttons.
"The Mouse" has now been superseded by "The Mouse II Laser", which is virtually identical in look and feel to the original product, but with a 1600 dpi laser tracking sensor. Besides the increased tracking resolution, laser tracking means you no longer need a mousepad if you prefer not to use one; the laser pickup is sensitive and accurate enough to work on virtually any mousing surface. No more uncertain performance on glossy or colored table tops.
The laser scanner also means the base no longer lights up, but its higher resolution should appeal to users who do precision work, and it also can be quickly reconfigured to operate at 800 dpi as well.
MacMice has also introduced two new mice based on the original "The Mouse" form factor - the Danger Mouse laser mouse and "The Mouse BT II" Bluetooth wireless mouse.
The Danger Mouse shares the 1,600 dpi tracking sensor of The Mouse II Laser and is the same size, shape, and weight, but it has an opaque plastic finish (available in solid white, black, or red) and a smaller-diameter, more deeply-recessed scroll wheel. I still like the original design a lot, with its classy clear-over-white livery (The Mouse II Laser is also available in silver), but for feel, I now prefer Danger Mouse, thanks to the small "miniscroll" wheel.
The Mouse BT II, on the other hand, has been something of a disappointment to me. While it shares its shape and dimensions with its corded siblings, for some reason it's still equipped with the old 800 dpi LED sensor, and the weight and weight distribution of its internal batteries have ruined the feel, IMHO.
While the MacMice corded rodents feel light and nimble, the BT II feels heavy and ponderous. The fact that it's also quite expensive doesn't help.
I'm personally not a fan of Bluetooth pointing devices, with their need for mucking around with batteries and with wireless pairing, wake-up lag, and a slight latency in response, and the BT II's surprisingly unsatisfactory feel certainly doesn't help. It's amazing that a device that looks exactly the same can feel so different.
So let's take a look at these three Mice in greater detail.
The Mouse II Laser
The Mouse II Laser (and the other two) is a nearly symmetrical rectangular ovoid in shape and of about average size for computer mice. The entire housing cover serves as the button - or more accurately in this case, two of the three buttons. The front half of the case is split and serves as left and right buttons.
This configuration may sound like more of a compromise than it is, and I find that it's very comfortable to use with plenty of tactile positive feedback. The Mouse II's conventionally-sized scroll wheel has a delightfully light, silky-smooth action and also a third button click function. I find the scroll wheel button click a bit too stiff on all of these mice, but I only use it for toggling Exposé.
The new 1,600 dpi laser tracking is fast and responsive for accurate pixel level editing. Personally, I find 1,600 dpi a bit too lively for most tasks, even on my PowerBook's big 17" display, but happily the resolution can be toggled to 800 dpi (the same as The Mouse's LED tracking sensor) by simply holding both click buttons down simultaneously for a few seconds. It works for me, and the higher resolution is always available if I feel the need.
If you are using OS X 10.1 or higher, no driver installation is necessary for basic support of mouse clicking and the scroll wheel. If you're still using Mac OS 8.5.1 through OS 9.2.2 or you want more mouse functionality than the built-in OS X drivers provide, proprietary drivers are downloadable at the MacMice support site. MacMice's MouseCommand v10 and MouseCommand v9 USB mouse drivers are full featured to satisfy demanding multi-button mouse users, with assignable scroll button, left-handed operation, adjustable clicking and motion, built-in adjustable cursor acceleration, reversible horizontal scrolling. The v9 driver works with Mac OS 8.5.1 through 9.2.2, and the v10 version works with Mac OS X 10.1 through the latest version.
One of the nicest things about The Mouse has always been its supple, flexible cord, and the Danger Mouse and Mouse Laser II cords are made of the same soft material, but they're five feet long - three feet more than The Mouse classic's cord. I'm a fan of long mouse cords (especially appreciated when using Apple 'Books with the USB ports located on the left side), so thanks for the extra length, MacMice.
Being a fan of the original classic MacMice The Mouse, I like this virtually identical but technically upgraded product as well. My only nitpicky complaint is that assembly tolerance standards seem to have slipped a bit since my 800 dpi The Mouse was made. The upper case housing has a lot more vertical play in it than with the classic unit, although I should add that the Danger Mouse I tested was the most solid-feeling of the three.
The Mouse Laser dimensions are 2.2" wide, 4.4" long, 1.2" high.
The Mouse Laser is available for $29.99
MacMice Danger Mouse USB Laser Mouse
Happily, the basic Mouse/Mouse II symmetrical ovoid form factor has been retained with Danger Mouse, although in opaque white or black (or red, about which more below) livery rather than the clear-over-white motif of the older design. I do prefer the aesthetic effect of clear-over-white. The opaque color looks a bit bland and utilitarian by contrast.
Functionally, the difference between the Mouse II and Danger Mouse is that the latter has a smaller diameter (10 mm) "Micro-Scroll" scroll wheel mounted nearly flush with the top of the Danger Mouse housing - in answer to the Apple Mighty Mouse's miniature trackball, and one that I think is more usefully practical. I didn't think I was going to like the tiny, barely-protruding scroll wheel as much as the conventionally-sized and configured one in The Mouse, which is as smooth as silk and requires virtually zero effort. However, once I got used to the Danger Mouse scroll wheel, I now definitely prefer it.
MacMice notes that Apple's use of a miniature scroll ball on Mighty Mouse exposed many users to a new and seemingly contradictory concept: a tiny scrolling device "feels" more precise in usage than a larger one. However, they suggest that many of these same users have learned that a sealed, embedded mini-trackball is not the perfect implementation of this idea. The MicroScroll miniature scroll wheel delivers the precision of an ultra-small scrolling device without the frustrations of a tiny trackball.
Much as I like the miniscroll wheel's size and ergonomics, isn't quite as smooth as the one in my three year old The Mouse. I hasten to add, however, that it is still very smooth
Aside from the color aesthetics and the different scroll wheels, there is little to choose between The Mouse II and Danger Mouse. Both have identical dimensions and weight. Both have the 1600 DPI resolution laser pickups, are nicely balanced and weighted, and I am of a mind that smoothness and low effort are as important in preventing and minimizing mousing fatigue and pain as exotic "ergonomic" form factors.
Before we leave the topic of weight, I'd like to note that the MacMice products' lack of it doesn't seem to make them flimsy. My three-year-old The Mouse still works perfectly and has never given any hint of trouble.
The standard Danger Mouse comes in either white or black and sells for $29.99. It's also available red version to benefit the new the Other Red fundraising effort to benefit the Peace Village School & Orphanage in Kenya, Africa. The Danger Mouse Red is priced at $29.99 (with $3 going to the Other Red charity).
The MacMice Mouse BT II
For reasons articulated above, I had fully expected to like MacMice's new rechargeable The Mouse BT II. Actually, the BT II is the fourth generation MacMice BlueTooth mouse, the previous iterations being the USB Charging/MicroScroll/800dpi models.
The BT II has a new Bluetooth transceiver module incorporating the range increases and power conservation benefits of the latest BT v1.2 standard and includes a mini-USB charging cradle that takes up little desk space while making charging the included AAA NiMH batteries quick and easy.
This latest iteration of the MacMice Bluetooth mouse also incorporates the Danger Mouse's MicroScroll miniature scrollwheel and also shares its styling with Danger Mouse. Consequently, it seemed probable that I would be pleased with the BlueTooth conversion as well, and I was was surprised to be completely underwhelmed by the Mouse BT II.
Part of the problem with the BT II is its execution of BlueTooth, which I find frustrating at the best of times - the latency of response and waiting for the wireless connection to reestablish itself upon waking the computer, the hassle of pairing, the necessity for batteries, and so on. Especially when working on a desktop, I'd rather just plug in a cable and have a nice, positive, hard-wired connection.
As noted above, unlike its wired siblings, the BT II still incorporates an 800 dpi LED optical sensor. That wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing - the 800 dpi LED in my classic The Mouse works just fine for my purposes, and I keep the resolution in my The Mouse Laser and Danger Mouse at the 800 dpi preference most of the time.
However, the LED in the be BTII doesn't seem nearly as positive or responsive as the one in The Mouse. I have no idea why this would be, other than that it might be accentuated by Bluetooth latency. Whatever, it's annoying, and I really wouldn't recommend the BT II for precision work like image editing. Get a The Mouse II Laser or Danger Mouse for less than half the price, and use it at 1600 dpi for pinpoint accuracy.
With its two necessary 750-920 mAh AAA NiMH cells installed, the BT II is advertised to be just 5 grams heavier than the wired Danger Mouse (my postage scale says it's more like 9 grams heavier), but it feels like a lot more than that. Perhaps it's partly weight distribution rather than dead weight itself. The batteries live at the back of the unit, which makes the BT II feel like it's dragging its butt.
Then there is the wobbly-ness of the BT II's case housing. While MacMice's original The Mouse and Danger Mouse have a nice, solid, non-rattly feel to them, the upper case housing of both the BT II and (to a lesser but still noticeable degree) The Mouse II Laser are tactilely and audibly loose on their respective bases, with too much vertical slack in the II laser and in both lateral and vertical planes with the BT II. In short, it feels sloppy and is a constant annoyance that would dissuade me from using this mouse even if there were no other objections. Perhaps some quality control improvement and greater consistency is in order.
Battery compartment access is convenient enough - just slide the latch and the bottom cover of the mouse housing lifts off.
To charge, plug the charger dock into a powered USB port on a computer and place the BT II on the dock so that the metal contacts on both devices connect by gravity. The blue indicator LED will flash while the batteries are charging and glow steadily once they are charged.
To activate the mouse connection, make sure Bluetooth is active on your computer. In OS X, check the "Discoverable" check box in the Bluetooth preferences panel and also "Show Bluetooth Status in the Menu Bar". On the mouse itself, make sure batteries are installed and charged and turn the bottom-located power switch on. You may or may not have to press the pairing "Connect" button on the bottom near the optical sensor for ten seconds.
From the Bluetooth menu, select "Set Up Bluetooth Device" and then follow the instructions. When asked for "Device Type", select "Mouse."
The mouse be BT II will put itself to sleep after a period of not activity to help converse battery power. You wake it up by clicking any button once, but it takes an annoying few seconds for it to reestablish communication with the computer. This is a common characteristic of Bluetooth mice and not unique to BT II.
The Mouse BT II sells for $69.99, the same price as Apple's Wireless Mighty Mouse. I'm not crazy about the Mighty Mouse design, but it does have the laser, which should make it more precise, and I wouldn't anticipate build quality issues in the Apple product.
If you're in the market for a BlueTooth mouse, you might also want to check out RadTech's BT600 5-button mouse (also 800 dpi LED technology), which includes in-mouse charging technology and sells for $10 less. I found it to have a good standard of finish and functionality in my Miscellaneous Ramblings review last year.
The Mouse BT II supports both Mac OS X or Win XP systems. With OS X 10.2.6 or Windows XP SP2 or higher, the operating system supplies the necessary drivers to enable both the left and right buttons.
All three mice are available from The MacMice website or from any of their worldwide retailers, such as Mac-Pro.
- Other Red
- Is 'The Mouse' from DVForge the Multi-button Mouse Apple Should Have Built?, 2005.01.31
- RadTech BT600 Rechargeable Bluetooth Mouse, 2006.10.17
Notice: Use of undefined constant U - assumed 'U' in /var/www/bbm/lowendmac.com/htdocs/misc/recent.php on line 4
Notice: Use of undefined constant md - assumed 'md' in /var/www/bbm/lowendmac.com/htdocs/misc/recent.php on line 5
Notice: Use of undefined constant nd - assumed 'nd' in /var/www/bbm/lowendmac.com/htdocs/misc/recent.php on line 6
Charles Moore has been a freelance journalist since 1987 and began writing for Mac websites in May 1998. His The Road Warrior column was a regular feature on MacOpinion, he is news editor at Applelinks.com and a columnist at MacPrices.net. If you find his articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Colby WalkMac, introduced 1989.06. A pair of portables based on the SE and SE/30.
- Support Low End Mac
Notice: Use of undefined constant featuredate - assumed 'featuredate' in /var/www/bbm/lowendmac.com/htdocs/misc/recent.php on line 17
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Mac Driver Museum
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ