PowerPC and Flash
From Michael:
Charles,
I was curious as to how everyone is managing on their PowerPCs
without the latest version of Flash.* My wife's
computer is a G5 Power Mac, and
she is driven nuts by the notices about applications not running
without the latest Flash plugin (mainly video in Facebook and/or
YouTube).
I'd really like to be able to get by without having to upgrade to an
Intel Mac, as this is the only problem we've had at all, not missing
any of the other latest upgrades. It would really be something if
Adobe's snub at Apple (abandoning PPC support) would cause us to have
to buy more Apple hardware.
What solutions are you aware of or are you implementing?
Thanks
Mike
Texas
Hi Mike,
I'm not really any sort of an expert on Flash issues
and the Mac. The main manifestation of Flash nonsupport that I
encounter is with my iPad.
I'm wondering if you've tried the TenFourFox PowerPC port of
Firefox 6. Might be worth a shot, and it's the best PPC Mac browser
left standing in my estimation.
However, TenFourFox no longer supports Flash plugins.
They explain:
Plugins on PowerPC are of special concern because
Mozilla is making updates to their plugin architecture which may
require the plugins themselves to be updated, and there are certain
difficult-to-correct bugs with them already on Tiger. Most importantly,
Adobe Flash for PowerPC is no longer maintained and has known security
risks that can crash or leak data, and QuickTime for Leopard will lose
its own support with the release of OS X Lion. In addition, Flash 10.1
is rapidly becoming unsupported by many applications.
As of TenFourFox 6.0, for these and other reasons,
plugin support ships disabled. Plugins will not operate by default, and
bug reports will no longer be accepted. Sites will now act as if no
plugins were installed at all.
To replace Flash and QuickTime, the TenFourFox folks
say:
There will still be some content you can't view
without a Flash plugin in the browser. Some of it can be worked
around.
- For YouTube videos in particular, the free MacTubes
application allows you to view YouTube video in multiple resolutions
and full-screen. It is also more efficient at playback on older Macs.
Please support this excellent application.
- If you have a fast-enough G4 or G5, you can also view many YouTube
videos using TenFourFox's built-in HTML5 WebM video support, which is
supported. To do so, visit http://www.youtube.com/html5 and
"opt in" to the HTML5 trial. This will set a temporary cookie so that
available embedded videos and videos on YouTube will be presented to
you in native HTML5 video, if available. While you do not need a
YouTube account to use HTML5 video, the cookie may periodically expire
and require renewal, and not all videos are available in WebM.
- For other video files, you can use any of the available Firefox
YouTube or Flash video download extensions, and view the media files
off-line with Perian for QuickTime
(or QuickTime itself for codecs QT supports).
- For other audio files, download the audio file and play it in
QuickTime Player.
- For PDF documents, download and view them in Preview or Adobe
Reader. Mozilla support for in-browser PDF is under development.
- If you absolutely must use a plugin, you can use Camino or OmniWeb at the same
time you use TenFourFox; these browsers currently still support PowerPC
and will run older plugins. This limits any security exposure to those
browsers and will not compromise TenFourFox. (There is also an
unsupported mode for 10.4Fx itself.) However, this will not solve the
security and compatibility issues the plugins will still have.
I hope this is of some help.
Charles
Charles
Thanks for taking the time to reply with all of this information; it
is tremendously helpful and much appreciated.
Best,
Mike
Chill Mat for Mac
From John:
Hi, Charles,
Reading your review of the Targus Chill
Mat for Mac convinced me to buy one. I found it on eBay for $23.50
delivered, and it arrived yesterday. I'm using it right now under my
17" PowerBook G4. Having not
experienced the original, I'm not bothered by the fan noise, and I was
delighted to find that the fans run with a single USB connection. I
find it to be very comfortable in my lap and a big improvement over the
hot aluminum bottom of the PB. I haven't tried to insert it in my
Targus backpack, though I want to; I can see what you mean about its
thickness.
Thanks for your thorough review. Keep them coming.
John Black
Franklin, Tennessee
Hi John,
Glad to hear you found the review helpful and then
trying the Targus Chill Mat. I've been using the (quieter and thinner)
original version under my Aluminum MacBook all summer,
since it tends to run hot ever since I installed OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard last
year. I haven't upgraded to OS X
10.7 Lion and currently have no immediate intention to, perhaps
never on this machine. it wouldn't surprise me if it ran even hotter
than Snow Leopard.
If I get a newer, faster Mac, I may be obliged to use
Lion whether I like it or not. That has me leaning to the current model 13" MacBook
Pro as my next system upgrade, since it offers core "i" power
combined with the ability to boot Snow Leopard. I digress.
Thanks for reading,
Charles
Tex-Edit Plus and Lion
From John:
Hello Charles,
From what you've described, it sounds like
Tom Bender could be having trouble with byte-order in his Intel build of Tex-Edit
Plus (TE+). PowerPC was a big endian architecture,
while Intel (32- and 64-bit) is little endian. Essentially, it's a
matter of which way around data is encoded.
The names little and big endian are straight out of
Gulliver's Travels, where they referred to the war between those
who favoured breaking into a boiled egg from one end or the other. It's
an apt comparison.
Ordinarily, such a low-level matter is hidden from software
developers by the high-level APIs they use, such as Cocoa. But in Tom's
case, it's possible he's dipping beneath these, especially as his app
has been around so long. If byte-order were an issue, the symptoms
would be incompatible documents between either architecture's build of
the app, as the same data is encoded the wrong way around from the
other side's point of view. A byte-order issue could also lie behind
the executable code warning you're finding from reverse coded
documents.
One way to test this is by using a hex editor and comparing files
from either build.
Please pass him my suggestion, if you would, and hopefully TE+ will
work seamlessly again. Byte-order is one of those things that can be a
real head-scratcher unless it's bit you before.
- John
Hi John,
Thanks for this. I've passed it along to Tom Bender as
requested. I'm not a programmer, so it's mostly Greek to me, but I'm
sure he speaks the programmer's language.
Charles
Quark File Incompatibility Between Versions
From Laurence:
I also used Tex-Edit Plus heavily in the past - glad to hear it's
back.
Also liked your look at the tools in Preview.
However, there's something I wish somebody would address: the crazy
incompatibilities between the various versions of Quark - to the point
where if you have three clients running different versions, you might
have to have each of those three versions yourself. It's my wife's
problem, but then every problem of hers inevitably falls into my lap -
it's insane!
Keep up the good work - I can't see myself using an iPad, and I have
no use for any kind of smartphone, but I do like Lion.
Laurence
Latest review: http://tinyurl.com/3cytbwr
Hi Laurence,
Thanks. Glad you enjoyed the articles.
I've never been a Quark user, so I can't comment on
that issue.
I'm interested to hear that you like Lion. Have you
seen OS X Lion: Apple's Vista
Moment?
From the general context of his website, it appears
that I disagree with the author profoundly on many things, but I'm
inclined to concur with his assessment of Lion.
Charles
Publisher's note: I used to work in publishing, and
I remember the nightmares we encountered when we started to switch from
XPress 3.3 to 4.0 due to file incompatibilities. Although Quark 4 could
open version 3.x files and even Save As... to version 3.x files, it was
infinitely easier for our designers to have both versions of Quark on
their Macs so they could open book files in the same version that
created the files and avoid the conversion process unless it became
absolutely necessary.
I believe Quark XPress has had these kind of file
issues with every major release, although I have been out of that
industry for over a decade now and had stopped using Quark long before
that. dk
Go to Charles Moore's Mailbag index.
