Here's to hoping that Apple won't follow Polaroid.
As we know, Apple is fiercely protective of it's operating system
and the hardware it runs on. They won't even license out production of
their own hardware designs as they once did.
At times that has cost the company dearly, in particular handing
Brazil to the PC clones on a silver platter when they became obsessed
with crushing Unitron instead
of using them as a "back door" behind the country's
protectionist import ban on computers (which ended in 1992).
As for Polaroid, they've filed for bankruptcy (or, as their website
says, "financial restructuring"). Polaroid was always fiercely
protective of their innovation of instant photography - so protective
that they never allowed anyone else to produce cameras compatible with
their film or film compatible with their cameras. They also sued anyone
(Kodak especially) whenever they produced instant cameras. For some
insane reason, they always won even though the basic patents on instant
photography processes had long expired.
Now Polaroid's protectionist tactics have come home to roost. With
their focus on a "Mine! All mine!" strategy, they artificially
limited their user base and were late to the digital photography
revolution.
My prediction is that except for a small number of professionals,
hobbyists, and cheap single use cameras, film photography will be dead
within five years.
Of course, a computer and operating system are more versatile than a
camera and film, but Polaroid has been around far longer than Apple
Computer. There's still plenty of time for a revolution not created by
Apple to sneak up on them while they are tightly focused on keeping all
their horses in the Apple Corral.
The preceding has been a plea for porting OS X to the PC
platform.
Share your perspective on the Mac by emailing with "My Turn" as your subject.