Upon reading the letter you published from
Tino, I felt compelled to write in. You see, I purchased my first
Wintel PC back in 1992 and have yet to buy a new one. I learned about
the PC, its operating systems, and its components and just upgraded the
machine until 1998, when I switched to a Macintosh.
It wasn't long before my PC had to be upgraded for my gaming use and
had absolutely nothing in common with what it started out with in '92.
In 1998, for 4 months, I even had a bleeding-edge, top-of-the-line PC
(for that time period) similar to how Tino now has a bleeding-edge PC.
It was then that I stepped back, reassessed my wants, needs, and the
cost of both, and then considered and bought a Macintosh for the first
time.
I must say his quote, "I believe you have missed one thing that
makes PCs attractive to many," is inaccurate. That is to say, unless
"many" equates to a minute fraction of all Wintel PC users. I, however,
suspect "many" means his friends, who are no doubt bleeding-edge
gamers.
I work in IT, and most of the family's of the people I work with
each day, who you think would know about PCs, do not fit in Tino's
"Power User" category. In fact, very few of all the Wintel users in the
world would fit his view of a Power User, so his use of "many" is
grossly exaggerated. He should have substituted "some of my friends"
for his "many." He then goes on to challenge readers to "decide if it
is inferior PC parts," meaning the parts that are in his PC. He
doesn't, however, name a manufacturer of his PC, and I'll tell you why.
He hand-picked the parts which would go into his PC by choosing what to
buy and then he built it from scratch.
Later, he claims someone backed down from a bake-off against his
machine. He says, "I won't bother comparing to dual CPU systems,
because that would not make sense." I would like to know wherein lies
the sense in comparing a stock 867 MHz Power Mac with a
custom built PC?! A good analogy here would be putting a Porsche you
could buy at the local foreign car dealer up against an Indy race car.
A Porsche can be a fast car, but it is hardly built to compete against
an Indy race car.
He and others like him (among which I counted myself a few years
ago) are among the minority when it comes to all Wintel PC users in the
world. He is obviously a gamer who seeks high frame rates in the games
he plays. It may very well be that his PC can churn out a ridiculously
high number of frames per second (fps) on Unreal Tournament, but once
you reach so many fps, it just doesn't make a discernible difference to
the human eye any more.
I am fairly sure that the 867 PowerMac falls well within the
"playable" range in such games. I would also add that both his system
and that of an 867 MHz PowerMac are overkill for burning CD-R/RWs and
playing MP3s.
When a generalization is made about substandard PC parts, I take it
to mean your stock computers from Dell, Gateway, Compaq, and Hewlett
Packard (to name a few). It would be foolish to claim every Mac part is
top quality and every single PC part is trash. I doubt the average Mac
user would believe this either. Besides, a more important issue is how
a high MHz number is used by Wintel PC vendors to market a PC as
powerful, when in reality the vendor makes the choice of installing
"integrated video" or other slow (but not substandard) parts which,
even when matched with a very fast processor, nevertheless act as a
bottleneck, preventing the machine from realizing its potential.
When Tino says his Indy car is better than our Porsche, I give him
no argument there. I do take serious issue, however, with the numbers
of people he equates to wanting his definition of choice. He is
clueless about the number of people who actually have the ability to
design, build, upgrade, and maintain the hardware and software that
goes into a PC such as his. Even if the number is larger than I
believe, there are still going to be a large number of those people who
don't want to spend the time (and time is money) troubleshooting and
upgrading their PC.
I used to love troubleshooting my PC, but now the glamour of getting
under the hood is far outweighed by the cost in time and money (to stay
on the bleeding edge) as well as the inconvenience of the down
time.
His PC does what he requires it to do and that is great for him. He
shouldn't buy a Mac for what he needs. He just should realize his
definition of Power User puts him in the minority of Wintel PC users,
and for much of the rest of the Wintel PC users, a Mac would be at
least as good a choice in the long term when you consider stability,
quality and life-cost of the system.
Share your perspective on the Mac by emailing with "My Turn" as your subject.
