Going Hackintosh
From Luke in response to 90% of
'Premium' PCs Sold Are Macs:
I used to think this was 100% true. But lately its hard for me to
agree. Mostly because of my own experience. My old standby, which has
been my workhorse computer for over seven years, is my MDD Dual G4. It's served me well
for thousands of purposes. But PowerPC and OS X Tiger are almost old school
now, and many modern requirements want at least Leopard 10.5.x or Snow Leopard 10.6.x and
Intel Mac infrastructure.
I looked at all my options for upgrading; there was little to go
with. My MDD maxed its RAM at 2 GB a while ago, I put in the best
AGP 4x/8x video card I could buy, and the only processor upgrade from
Sonnet is over $600 and is still PPC G4. What I could do is run various
cards like a 5-port USB 2.0 card and a SATA PCI card and swap out old
slow EIDE/ATA hard drives for SATA hard drives.
Oh, and OS's - my MDD since this past summer 2009 has run Native OS
9.2.2, Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger, and Novell's openSuSE 11.1 PPC w/ GNOME 4.x, each
one on their own hard drive.
But this was not enough. More applications and even games I want to
be able to use on my computer. The big problem: Apple no longer made a
computer that fit my wants/needs. The only tower computer they sell,
the Mac Pro, is prohibitively
expensive. Even brand new, my old MDD Dual G4 was still around $1,500
configured at that time with 1 GB RAM, 80 GB hard drive,
SuperDrive, and GeForce 4 Ti 4600 128 MB video, Mac OS X 10.3 Panther.
The next choice is the iMac. Although I've toyed with the
idea of it, I've never liked the aspect of anything all-in-one. It took
me three years to get used to the idea of having a
fax/copier/scanner/printer device. Problem is iMacs are notorious for
having a component go south, such as the screen. Plus iMacs are limited
in internal expansion. Sure, the display is awesomely big and beautiful
and a sight to behold, but when it dies, how do you use the Mac that's
inside with another monitor? I don't know, because I never owned
one.
Last options are go all mobile with a MacBook. Either or both the
regular and pro MacBook's are awesome for portability, but still
there's plenty of things it does not have that would require more parts
and doodads to make it work as a replacement for my workhorse Mac.
Or the Mac mini. This
was the closest option I could bring myself too. Essentially a headless
iMac. It offered almost everything I want except for one thing: limited
graphics. Okay, yes the Nvidia GeForce 9400M is a great GPU, why not,
its used as the GPU of choice in all the current low-end iMacs,
MacBooks, and Mac minis. It uses shared system RAM, and it can't be
upgraded or bypassed. What if one day the GPU dies, or what if one day
the 9400M isn't as powerful as you would want it to be? I was a very
vocal minority on Macintouch.com
forums and other Mac lists crying for Apple to make something akin to a
middle Mac.
Something like a small micro or mid tower Mac with all the power and
functionality of the Mac mini and iMac, but with good ol' expandability
of the old Mac towers.
Of course everyone knows that never happened - and in all likelihood
will never happen. I accepted my fate to being a left out Mac lover
whom Apple does not give a care about. I was resigned to saving up my
hard earned cash and get a Mac mini to replace my aging MDD Dual G4.
The Mac mini, from everything I've read and seen, can run circles
around my old G4 tower except for expandability. And that always bugs
me. I am an old school computer geek who loves to tinker and squeeze
all the power and juice out of every computer I ever own. If there is
something I don't know how to do, I try to read and learn what I can
and expose myself to trial and error and trial until I gain success or
learn acceptance.
An online buddy told me, You don't have to conform to Apple's
status quo. You can do what I did and build your own computer and put
Mac OS X on it and have a Mac with room to grow and expand. So
I jumped in and learned all I could. And here I am almost six months
later" I am running a home built custom configured dual boot Intel
system with two 500 GB hard drives - one that boots Windows XP and the
other that boots Mac OS X Leopard. It was not easy. Don't
ever think its easy to build a "Hackintosh". It was a lot more than I
ever bargained for. But for all intensive purposes, it works. I am very
happy.
Last summer I learned about PPC Linux and installed and setup
openSuSE on a hard drive in my MDD. Without having some basic Linux
knowledge, I could not of gone ahead with building my "Gigamac", as I
like to call it.
I know its not legal. But what can I say? It is a legal
retail universal edition of Mac OS X 10.5.6 Leopard DVD I
purchased and used originally to upgrade my MDD. I decided not to
upgrade the MDD and decided to use it for my "Gigamac". And all the
parts that make up this computer are bought and paid for properly. Its
just not a real Apple. Well, I guess I had to take a page from
Steve Jobs' book about being a pirate. Except Steve forgot what it was
like to be a pirate and be a rebel against the old IBM world.
How is my Gigamac? It's pretty darn fast. Not perfect though:
Drivers are a main pain in the behind. Leopard works for now for the
most part. My build has some sound and LAN issues I am working through,
but technically it boots up and the graphics work and Photoshop scans
in photos and I can fool around with Pages and Keynote with iWork 09,
which I purchased legally. There is a lot that I need to do, and there
is no guarantee everything will work if I ever upgrade it to Snow
Leopard. That's the #1 advantage a real Apple Mac has - it's been
tested and 99.9% works with all the hardware it's built around. And a
real Apple Mac you can go ahead and shell out the dough for AppleCare,
which will come to your rescue when something gets fried. With a custom
Hackintosh, something goes south, it's all on you to decipher.
Thanks for reading my Rant & Rave.
Peace,
Luke
Thanks Luke. I enjoyed reading your saga.
Different strokes for different needs and tastes. I've
pretty much always been an AIO (all-in-one) guy - counting laptops as
AIOs. I've owned more than a dozen Macs over the years, and only two
have not been AIOs - a SuperMac
S900 and a G4
Cube.
I might enjoy tinkering with electronics if I had the
time, but I am probably more inclined to woodworking, which I hope to
get back to if I ever retire.
As for hackintoshing, I can't recall ever hearing of
Apple going after a private user for violating the OS X EULA,
which despite its broad brush scope I think is in fact pretty much
exclusively focused on keeping operations like Psystar at bay.
Philosophically, I'm of a mind that if you buy a copy of OS X you
should be within your rights to install it on whatever computer you
want, and I think the DMCA is an insult to fair use and justice,
notwithstanding its technical legality. Interesting how Mr. Jobs went
from being the guy who said "It's better to be a pirate than to join
the Navy" to being one of its most powerful admirals.
Personally, I just assume I'll be upgrading my system
every three years or so and that whatever's available at the end of
those intervals will be able to blow the proverbial doors off even a
hot-rodded three-year-old machine. That doesn't stop me enjoying my
Pismo PowerBooks. There's more to computing than raw speed.
Charles
Aperture 3: Leaving PowerPC Behind
From Dan:
It's been flashed all across the usual Mac news services, but I'm
surprised it hasn't hit here. Apple put out the next iteration of
Aperture yesterday with Aperture 3.
As a photographer who's been using and loving Aperture since the 1.5
build, I was pretty excited. There were definitely some long overdue
features that had me ready to shill out $100 for the upgrade. When I
got home, I was disappointed to find that, yet again, Apple has proven
to be moving toward "Intel only".
I was unfortunate enough to invest in a 1.67 GHz PowerBook G4 mere
months before the Intel switch. I've got to tell you, I've been getting
along just fine with G4 up to this point. Sure, emulating Windows to
run AutoCAD was painful initially, and I've given up on doing that at
all at this point. And movie encodes and 3D rendering have always been
a weekend process, but I've gotten used to the wait. And there was
always a limit to how far I could take Logic projects, even with mixing
down whenever possible. When 10.6, a mere $29 for someone like me
running Leopard, came out as "Intel only", I figured it wasn't all that
attractive anyway, since it wouldn't do my system much good.
However, this is the straw that's breaking my back. There's stuff in
this update that could really help my business, and they're not even
processor-intensive features, but Apple seems to want to drop PPC
support altogether. Aside from added cost, I have to wonder, why?
Perhaps it's their shoot-out with Lightroom that
lead them to include video support. That tells me this is going
to be another behemoth like iTunes that does every type of media, and
then some since the announcement of the iPad. I could deal with not
being able to use iMoveHD - I'm not a video kind of guy in general,
though that may change once my kid gets here. Perhaps they wanted
everything to "just work" and didn't want anyone out there to be using
hardware that made Aperture look slow and unresponsive.
Whatever the reasons, the result is that I don't know if I can use
my aging Mac to do work anymore. I've been dreaming and saving for a
Mac Pro, but a new wife, new mortgage, and baby on the way have really
shifted the cash flow for other essentials. Whatever your reasons for
keeping your old Mac, how do you guys survive if you're doing anything
besides media playback, web browsing, and word processing? I ask
because of your noted experience, and I might be stuck gimping along
for who knows how long.
Best regards,
Dan
Hi Dan,
I share your pain, as there is building momentum to
dropping PPC and/or Tiger support with more and more new software.
I held out for three years and a bit, but the tipping
point for me was probably in large measure
MacSpeech Dictate, which has always been Intel-only and is
substantially superior to the old
MacSpeech iListen (which I still use from time to time on my old
Pismos). I would also
be seriously pained if I didn't have access to Google's Chrome browser, which is
currently in a neck-and-neck tie with Opera as my fave browser (I find
I'm not a happy camper trying to get along without at least three
browsers on the go).
I still love using my Pismos, but I have come to terms
with living within their limitations, in which case they're still
great, but I don't think I could go back to PPC only. It's interesting
that I found my 17"
PowerBook G4 more dispensable than the Pismos, handing it off to my
wife in return for the Pismo she had been using (she loves the
17-incher).
My suggestion to you would be to somehow scrape up the
grickles to get a used or
refurbished MacBook - given your graphics orientation, definitely a
new enough one so it has an Nvidia GeForce 9400M graphics processor.
The compromise will, of course, be adjusting to life with a 13" glossy
display with 1280 x 800 resolution, but I haven't found it as difficult
as I thought it would be. Of course, my 17" machine was an older one
with 1440 x 900 res, and not one of the more recent higher resolution
models.
Charles
LaserWriter Still Chugging Along after 15
Years
From Owen after reading Using
'Obsolete' Technologies on a Daily Basis:
Always enjoy reading your mailbag columns. I too had a '65 Chevy
with a 283, though it was a Bel Air, and it was really my Dad's.
Thought you might be interested in my obsolete story - I have a pile
of old Macs, accessories, etc., but this is a printer story. I bought a
used Apple LaserWriter 16/600PS
off of
eBay in October of '02. I put a fresh toner cartridge in it, set it
up in the den, plugged it into a router, and it's been chugging away
24/7 ever since.
Lately it's been showing a black smudge up the right-hand side of
the page, and more recently it started printing black horizontal lines
every couple inches as well. I've done some surfing, and it looked like
I'd need a $50 repair kit for the first problem, and about 50% chance
that a new $65 toner cartridge would solve the latter.
This is a 15-year-old printer that's been running nonstop with no
maintenance for at least half that time. The printer status tools don't
work right under TCP/IP printing (which I had to set up to print from
Snow Leopard), and the
configuration utility only runs under Classic (which I don't have
available on either of my active machines just now). I could spend
$115+ on it (more like $175 locally) and hope that would fix it,
or I could buy a new color laser printer for under $200 and get rid of
that inkjet that we keep in the closet for the occasional color
job.
Well, we are under a tight budget, but I am just incapable of
letting things go, and I found a secondhand unopened 98A toner
cartridge on Amazon for $25. While waiting for it to arrive, I dug out
the service manual PDF and dissected the machine for cleaning. There
was a bit of cat hair in the rollers and rather a lot of dust in the
fan duct, but surprisingly little anywhere else. A little rust on the
fuser roller that I thought might account for the edge smudge, but not
much I could do about that. It took three tries to get it back together
and working, and then I was rewarded with a "low toner" light. In
retrospect, I don't think the cleaning really accomplished much.
When the new cartridge arrived, I stuck it in there and ran a test
page, and the silly old thing printed out as sharp and clean a page as
I've ever seen. This printer was introduced in 1994, and now it looks
like it's good to go for another five years!
Thanks!
Owen
Hi Owen,
Great printer story. My daughter had one of those old
LaserWriters here for a while back in the late '90s, and it did a
wonderful job. Delighted to hear that yours is back in service.
I still have a dot-matrix Apple ImageWriter II printer
that was working fine the last time we used it, which was years ago. I
expect ribbons might be tough to find these days.
It's amazing how many folks' lives were touched by '65
Chevies. Mine was a Bel-Air as well, but with a six-cylinder
engine.
Charles
Charles,
I still have my ImageWriter II also, but I think the last time I
used it was in '99 when I installed an AppleTalk card just to see if it
would work (from Herb's Mac
Stuff - found on LEM - and he still has ribbons available). Of
course it worked fine, but it didn't make it any faster or quieter, or
improve the print quality. 8-)
OTOH, that LaserWriter is as functional as any B/W laser printer I
could buy today. When it was introduced, I was still using my Mac SE, had never networked a
computer, didn't have a modem, and had never heard of the World Wide
Web. And yet it hums away just fine plugged into my Time Capsule.
Thanks!
Owen
HI Owen,
Oh, I agree entirely. I wouldn't actually want to go
back to using an ImageWriter, but it was a reliable old brute.
The LaserWriter is vastly superior, and also
robust.
Charles
Ambrose Bierce on 'Obsolete'
From Bill:
Mr. Moore,
I happened to be rereading The Devil's Dictionary
by Ambrose
Bierce when your "Using 'Obsolete' Technologies on a Daily Basis"
article appeared in your Feb. 10 column. I thought you might like
Bierce's definition of obsolete:
OBSOLETE, adj. No longer used by the
timid. Said chiefly of words. A word which some lexicographer has
marked obsolete is ever thereafter an object of dread and loathing to
the fool writer, but if it is a good word and has no exact modern
equivalent equally good, it is good enough for the good writer. Indeed,
a writer's attitude toward "obsolete" words is as true a measure of his
literary ability as anything except the character of his work. A
dictionary of obsolete and obsolescent words would not only be
singularly rich in strong and sweet parts of speech; it would add large
possessions to the vocabulary of every competent writer who might not
happen to be a competent reader.
Fits rather well with Low End Mac, I think.
Bill
Hi Bill,
I agree, and thanks for the citation. Bierce's
lexicographical and etymological definitions are priceless, rivaling
and arguably surpassing his contemporary, Oscar Wilde (with whom
Bierce was acquainted and held in contempt of sorts - see Love and Kisses: Ambrose Bierce
and Oscar Wilde) for biting wit, and highly recommended reading for
anyone.
Here are four of my other Bierce favorites:
MAD, adj. Affected with a high
degree of intellectual independence; not conforming to standards of
thought, speech and action derived by the conformants from study of
themselves; at odds with the majority; in short, unusual. It is
noteworthy that persons are pronounced mad by officials destitute of
evidence that they themselves are sane. For illustration, this present
(and illustrious) lexicographer is no firmer in the faith of his own
sanity than is any inmate of any madhouse in the land; yet for ought he
knows to the contrary, instead of the lofty occupation that seems to
him to be engaging his powers he may really be beating his hands
against the window bars of an asylum and declaring himself Noah
Webster, to the innocent delight of many thoughtless spectators.
CARTESIAN, adj. Relating to
Descartes,
a famous philosopher, author of the celebrated dictum, cogito ergo
sum - whereby he was pleased to suppose he demonstrated the reality
of human existence. The dictum might be improved, however, thus:
cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - "I think I think, therefore I
think that I am;" as close an approach to certainty as any philosopher
has yet made.
PHONOGRAPH, n. An irritating toy
that restores life to dead noises.
TELEPHONE, n. An invention of the
devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable
person keep his distance.
What might Bierce have said of the iPod and
iPhone?
Charles
Old Chevies
From Ed:
Charles,
My dad had a 1966 Chevy Caprice with in-dash ignition that he kept
for 40 years. He replaced the engine a couple times, something to be
expected of a Depression baby (and a NASA engineer). He didn't use it
the last 10 years, and if I had had the money and space (and an
indulgent wife), I'd have taken it off his hands.
He didn't drive it from California to Maryland, as he did with his
62 Corvair, but it
made many trips from Maryland to my mom's family in New Jersey.
As you know, it had a very simple engine and transmission with room
to spare in the engine compartment. I think the engine was between 200
and 250 displacement.
I'm pretty sure he had over 200,000 miles on it.
I just saw this Impala on Craigslist: 1964
Impala (obo) 64 impala - $11550 (Upper Marlboro)
Take care,
Snowed-in Ed
Hi Ed,
As you probably recall, the '65 and '66 full-sized
Chevies only differed from each other slightly in styling and
essentially not at all mechanically, other than some different engine
choices. If my memory serves, the '66 model saw the introduction of the
396 CID V8 (it was actually a 401, but GM fudged the number lower to
help mollify insurance companies), which replaced the '50s-era truck
engine based 409 as the most powerful engine choice. Also new in '66
was the Caprice high-end model, which displaced the Impala as top dog
in the pack.
The '62 through '64 models were a substantially
different car, with the corporate GM X-frame chassis, rather than the
full perimeter frame on the '65 through '70 models. I had a '63
Biscayne coupe. It was good, but the '65 rode and handled better.
And yes, those big cars, especially when powered by
inline 6-cylinder engines (230 CID and 250 CID displacements were
available with that engine design as well as a 300 CID truck version
with a taller block), had a luxury of room under the hood. You could
climb right in and sit on the wheel wells while you tinkered. I had
230s in both my '63 and '65 Chevs. Great engines, and a marine
conversion of the the 300 inch variant remained a popular commercial
fishing boat power plant here in Atlantic Canada well into the
'80s.
Sometime in the late '60s, Car and Driver magazine ran
a feature in which three editors chose their pick for "best sedan in
the world" at the time. Editor/Publisher David E. Davis Jr. chose the
Mercedes-Benz 300SEL 6.3, which was the highest performance Mercedes
sedan at the time. Patrick Bedard chose the then-new original Jaguar
XJ-6, but Charles Fox went with a used beater '66 Chev and made a
convincing case. Davis and Bedard are still C&D columnists more
than 40 years on, incidentally.
My family also had an original series Corvair - a 1961
metallic red Monza coupe with an all-white interior. Very sharp
looking, and it was a good, dependable car.
Charles
iPad Remote Computer Control Options
From twv:
Charles
A question for Low End Mac: I was wondering: Do you think one could
control one's home computer, remotely, from the iPad?
Could one perform complicated, procesesor-intensive tasks on one's
computer from an iPad, using something like GotoMyPC?
I really don't want a laptop. But I do want to work on my Mac Pro,
which resides in my office, while away!
twv
Hi twv,
There are already many remote control apps for the
iPhone, so I think optimism is warranted.
Charles
Netbooks Are Cheaper!
Sure, you can get a netbook from Sprint for $199. But you also have
to pay $1,420 over the next two years for service. If you go to the
Dell site, they start at $300.
My only problem with the iPad is that
they came out right after I purchased an iPod touch for use in my
company. But if the announced keyboard will work, I will be quite
happy.
Scott
Hi Scott,
The keyboard/charging dock is a great feature and
would/will be a must-have if I get an iPad. However, it only takes us
halfway there. Still need support for a real, peripheral pointing
device.
I still think Apple is missing the boat by not
offering a netbook with a conventional clamshell form factor and a real
keyboard and trackpad. If they can sell iPads for $500, they should be
able to get a netbook out the door for $600 to $650, and that's
something I'd be a lot more interested in, especially if it ran the
real Mac OS as well.
Charles
Why Do You Dislike IMAP?
From Robert:
Hi Charles,
I read your article
questioning the need for another email client and was intrigued by
your comment about not being a fan of IMAP.
As a fan of IMAP, I'm interested in knowing why you dislike IMAP. I had
the opportunity to compare using an email client under both protocols
and couldn't imagine returning to POP under any but the most extreme of
circumstances.
Best regards,
Robert
Hi Robert,
Why am I not an IMAP fan? Guess I've spent too many
years with slow Internet access and prefer to have my email archives on
my hard drive and accessible without being online. Not many wireless
hot spots in this neck of the (literal) woods, and with IMAP your
messages remain on the central mail server, whereas POP downloads all
messages in your inbox onto your computer where you can access them for
reference whether you're online or not.
I appreciate that IMAP can be a good choice for people
who need to access email from multiple computers, but for my own
accounts where that is more convenient, I use Gmail
with POP access configured to leave the messages on the Gmail
server, which seems to me the best of both worlds.
Charles
Nondestructive Drive Partitioning
From Dan Knight in response to Nondestructive Repartitioning:
Charles,
Disk Utility, Drive Genius,
and iPartition all
claim support of live/on-the-fly nondestructive partitioning. Not sure
if all partition formats are supported on all of these, as iPartition
only lists HFS+, FAT, and NTFS.
Dan
Another Nondestructive Repartitioning Option
From Sam:
Although Disk Utility and the other applications support
non-destructive repartitioning, another excellent choice would be
GParted Live,
which is a bootable Linux distribution stripped down to just a
partition program. It's capable of being run off of a flash drive and a
physical disk.
Sometimes the OS will not allow modification of the boot partition,
especially if it is fragmented enough that it requires moving some
files. In that case, your only choice is to boot from another location,
like a flash drive or CD containing GParted.
I'm not sure if there is a version capable of running on PowerPC, as
I don't have one to test it on.
Sam
Hi Sam,
Thanks for the suggestion.
Charles
Blocking Flash in Opera
From Gordon:
Flashblock is
my favorite Firefox extension.
What can I use to block Flash content within the Opera browser? Searches of Opera 10 help
files and Google didn't show any blockers. If Flash content cannot be
blocked in Opera, then Opera will be deleted from my laptop.
Regards,
Gordon
Hi Gordon.
Here are what seem to be some possible
workarounds:
Charles
Go to Charles Moore's Mailbag index.
