Apple's Great Hebrew Support, AirPort Express Silently Upgraded, Pismo G4, and More
- Apple's Spectacular Support for Hebrew
- Apple's Silent AirPort Express 'Upgrade'
- Pismo G4
- WindowShade Replacement for OS X 10.7 and 10.8
- 15" Late 2008 MacBook Pro
- Three 13" Apple Laptops Again
This iOS 6 map situation (see Does Apple Have a Problem with Israel?) may only be a shandeh fur ze goyim, if you'll pardon me my yiddishkeit.
My wife and I are both Jews and ardent Zionists. We have friends and family in Israel, and unless we retire to Boca, Israel may well figure into our retirement plans, but that's a ways off. My daughter's bat mitzvah is creeping up on us, and it will likely take place in Israel.
I still have a Mac Classic sitting with the Hebrew version of System 7.5.3 installed. Between my daughter's 4th generation iPod touch, my wife's iPhone 4S, and Messages on my Mountain Lion install, I cannot find a coherent functional family of devices that foster my daughter's blossoming Hebrew education more than Apple devices. And since I do development at times for Israeli clients, communicating with them with the intelligently transliterative QWERTY Hebrew layout is much easier than the Windows equivalent.
It gives me pause - do these amazing capabilities that make Apple devices viable in Israeli markets matter more than what their map app says? Certainly, OS X is not targeting the American Jewish market with the language and regionalization capabilities of Mac OS X. I have yet to ever find the equivalent support, particularly with the ease of use, in a Windows installation or an Android device. My phone is an HTC EVO model, and Hebrew support, while present, leaves me envying my wife's iPhone. I cannot imagine that Rabbi Miller uses Apple devices to correspond with his colleagues/friends/loved ones in Israel if this context is lost on him.
It's also important to note, with respect to Rabbi Miller, that many Israelis recognize the lack of international consensus on the matter of Jerusalem, even if it is a pain point. Israelis on a daily basis work with multinational firms that work around Arab sensitivities in a manner that comes at their expense, but still suffer these companies to do a brusque business within their borders.
The nerd in me gets a smile every time I go through my wedding album. We laid out our wedding program in the first version of Pages on what was then my still relatively new iMac G5. The Hebrew typography was as gorgeous then as it is now. When we returned from our honeymoon, iPhoto and iMovie made capturing and preserving our memories effortless. At every turn, Apple's products have effortlessly supported who we are culturally. It's hard to dismiss that.
Thanks for the interesting letter and testimonial to Apple's longstanding support of Hebrew on its product.
I'm inclined to give Apple the benefit of doubt on this one. Apple's new iOS Maps app is so deficient in so many instances worldwide that it's probably overreaction to infer any deliberate slight in a particular instance.
New AirPort Express
Today I noticed something that I haven't read or seen on any page I regularly visit. Or maybe I missed it which show how "insignificant" this news is. But it is one of those super silent model upgrades Apple is known for. The humble AirPort Express has had an update! Dual ethernet ports, simultaneous dual band in WiFi, and a new design (it sort of reminded me of the Apple TV (current model), but then of course in white and a further abandonment of the "old" looks that early MacBooks and most iBooks had. Under the hood? Don't know. Missing from this one - and basically from any AirPort base station - is AirPrint. The website is all about how compatible it is with all Macs, PCs, and iOS devices . . . but not when it comes to printing. There is a fairly large paragraph on wireless printing and yes, I guess a newbie to Apple could be under the impression that it would allow their iOS device to print. It doesn't. And it remains a shame that Apple wants you to upgrade a perfectly good printer that is only a few years old, just so you can print from a handful of applications on your iOS device. Or print to PDF . . . nah, nobody does that! ;-)
And whether this means that the "old" Airport Express will not be getting any more updates, who knows.
Who knows indeed!
Printing from iOS devices is such a hassle that I've never bothered experimenting. Dropbox makes it so easy to just print from my Macs, and no need to upgrade my lightly used printer hardware.
I think it's idiotic that the iPad doesn't have at least a USB port. Another reason to consider Microsoft's Surface.
I've recently decided to get some parts to fix my old Pismo PowerBook (it had logicboard failure). I was thinking of getting a G4 upgrade. I was wondering what Geekbench score your Pismo G4's get, and whether or not having the G4 allowed you to play YouTube videos. Also, please let you're readers know if you ever decide to put your Pismos on eBay, as some might be interested in buying one. Thanks!
To be honest, I haven't a clue what the G4 upgraded Pismos Geekbench at, but seat-of-the-pants, it isn't fast by today's standards - or even the standards of six or seven years ago.
As for YouTube videos, the more significant inhibiting factor is the Rage Mobility 128 graphics with a measly 8 MB of non-upgradable VRAM. I do occasionally watch YouTube video on the Pismo, but definitely not full screen!
Sell the Pismos? Never say never, but they're still getting lots of use for tasks where the speed deficit isn't as important.
Hey Charles, thanks for writing back!
To be honest with you, I think it's the challenge of taking something so old in computing years, with so many limitation for today's standards, yet having so much potential, that makes me want to get the most out of it as possible. Not to mention the Pismo was my first laptop and got me through college. It was great having a machine what I could use for my art and computer graphics courses, as well as general education, and even my Unix CCNA electives. I don't think anyone else in that college was doing what I was doing, and if they could, they probably didn't have such a great tool to do it all with!
I've been brushing up (and digging up) my old software for the Pismo, and researching what I could do to it in order to get the most out of it. I'm a graphic designer/print operator/light IT guy by trade, and a hacker by heart, so I'll have fun just messing around with my old friend the Pismo. If you'd like, I'll share with you and your readers what I'm doing and how it'll work out for me (as I've been a long time reader of yours and LEM as well, I've come to greatly appreciate these kinds of stories).
So far I'm still waiting for parts and upgrades to come in the mail, but here's what I ordered off eBay:
- Whole "new" PowerBook G3 Pismo @ 500 MHz for about $70 in great shape with DVD-ROM and battery that holds a slight charge (for the price, and the fact that I'm only 98% sure it was the logicboard that failed in my old Pismo, I decided to just keep my old one as swap out parts). It was from a very friendly seller, a small chain retailer from Maryland called PCRetro.com, who claims these were traded in from a college and were most likely used by professors. The person I spoke to is an old Mac fan and had enough from the trade-in to sell two fully working Pismos (I'll be asking him about the other parts soon).
- AKE slim 2 Port USB 2.0 PCMCIA Card, $6.99 with free shipping. This thing doesn't stick out from the side of a laptop, and I've read reports of it working with the Pismo (if only it included 802.11n too!)
- EDIMAX EW-7811Un USB 2.0 Wireless nano Adapter, $9.99 with free shipping. I wanted 802.11n, because given the Pismo's lack of certain new ports and the fact that I have my tower (a Hackintosh) as the hub of my household's devices including my personal software archive - WiFi networking will be used more than anything else.
What I already have:
- 1 GB of RAM
- 1 original battery that I doubt holds a charge, and 1 NewerTechology 6600 mAh that hasn't been charged in 6 years (I'm not expecting much here).
- 40 GB 5400 rpm hard drive with OS X 10.4.11 already install (thanks to my trusty 800 MHz DP Quicksilver PowerMac G4).
- An external FireWire DVD-RW that's I've had for year in case I need to do anything more than read DVDs on the Pismo (or in case the DVD-ROM isn't doing its job well).
Here's what I'm debating:
- 550 MHz G4 to make up for that lack of graphic power and give a little boost to general computing. Wegener Media is still offering the Daystar 550 G4, but at $200. Like you said, it still won't be very fast for 6 or 7 years ago standard. I'll be keeping a keen eye on eBay for upgrades though.
- An PATA SSD (about $70 for 32 GB KingSpec brand on eBay) or the OWC Legacy Pro SSD. I've ready mixed reports, but I found a seller who swears it'll work with a 14 day money back guarantee. People always rate the SSDs on their IO potential, but I've found in older laptop such as my Early 2006 Core Duo iMac, just having the dramatically improved access time and fact that the OS doesn't need to defrag and create hot files, should really boost this old PowerBook. I'm also thinking this will help a lot with the 1 GB RAM limit, as swapfiles should perform much better, even if the Pismo only has an ATA6 interface.
- A new battery in case the other three I'll have isn't doing it for me, but I'll spend most of the time plugged in I may not need it.
- Linux MintPPC! I love the Mac, and I still use Tiger occasionally on two of my old machines, but Linux may just be the best support this the Pismo as far as Internet and media goes. This flavor of Linux is very light and streamlined, much more so than 10.4 from what I read. However I wouldn't dream of only installing Linux on the Pismo, but I may just dual boot it with 2 partition (or maybe 3 partition so I can use all my old classic software). The creator of MintPPC has excellent Pismo support.
All and all, it's really the challenge and the restoration process I love. 8 or 9 years ago I dreamed of painting the Pismo to show it's true "hot rod of laptops" nature, but now I like the idea of preserving it's original designers' intent. The only thing that stands in my way is money and time, but those two things tend to be the framework for creativity.
I hope you enjoyed this not so little ramble of madness!
Now if only I could figure out a way to re-solder more graphics memory onto the board!
I haven't been following the Mac news so closely lately (due to preoccupation with health difficulties), so am not familiar with your current computer setup, in particular what version of Mac OS X you are running. But as I recall, like me you are one who is reluctant to use a Mac without WindowShade, so I'm guessing that like me you may still be with 10.6 - perhaps for other good reasons as well, as in my case. OTOH, you may be ready to move into the New Age of OS X, but for the lack of this functionality which many agree Apple should never have abandoned.
Anyway, when I saw that an alternative to WindowShade has appeared, I thought of you. WindowMizer ($9.99) looks to do the same as the original WindowShade at least, though I haven't tried it yet. I saw it mentioned in the comment thread for WindowShade at MacUpdate, though for some reason WindowMizer isn't listed there (perhaps because it must be bought before downloading?). I figure not only would you like to know about it (if indeed you don't yet), but (assuming it works satisfactorily) also it deserves some publicity, which you can give it in one of your articles.
See also his History of WindowShade page and the WindowMizer FAQ page, especially Why is WindowMizer an Application, and not a System Extension?
Looks like he's found another way than the often-criticized "haxie" method of Unsanity. Which is why he can sell it in the Mac App Store, presumably.
There's one review, which says "WindowMizer works very well. It may be a little slower that that other window collapsing utility, but given that WindowMizer does not alter the OS nor inject code into other applications, I think it's a great application."
As I said, I haven't tried it yet, since WindowShade X still works for me in 10.6 and I'm in no hurry to lose access to decades of AppleWorks and other Rosetta data. But for $10 it seems worth a try for 10.7/8 users who miss Windowshading capability.
Terribly sorry to hear of your health issues, and I wish you a resolution to that.
Regarding Windowshading and OS X, I'm still a fan, but I've moved on from OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard to 10.8 Mountain Lion, having skipped 10.7 Lion. I still like 10.6's user interface and feature set better than the iOS-ified Lion/Mountain Lion UI, but 10.8 surprised me by being livelier and running cooler enough on my Core 2 Duo MacBook that the cooling fan rarely cuts in, as opposed to with 10.6 with which the fan runs frequently. Those two advantages have been enough to keep me using Mountain Lion, even though I still have Snow Leopard installed on the other hard drive partition, so I still have Rosetta support if I need it.
Actually, from Leopard onward I found that the Spaces feature could serve as a not-too-bad substitute for Windowshading - until Apple ruined Spaces in versions 10.7 and 10.8, folding it into Mission Control. [See Why Spaces Is My Favorite Leopard (and Snow Leopard) Feature.] It's still a lot better than nothing, but it makes me wish for the Windowshade feature, with use of my old Pismos running OS X 10.4 Tiger a constant reminder of how good it is.
WindowMizer looks good too. Thanks for the tip. I wasn't previously aware of this product.
Again, wishing you quick recovery, or at least some relief from your health problems.
I am investigating the purchase of a (used) 2.4 GHz 15" Late 2008 MacBook Pro (Unibody).
While trying to track down some information about the firmware update for this model, I found your article Firmware Update Supports 8 GB in Unibody MacBook and Late 2008 15" MacBook Pro, which addresses the change that enables the use of 8 GB RAM. I have run into a lot of information about the "Negotiated Link Speed = 1.5 Gb/s" matter but have not been able to find a definitive answer to the situation. I have been told by one person to use a (SATA II) 3 Gb/s SSD rather than a (SATA III) 6 Gb/s SSD and, with the firmware update, it should work at 3 Gb/s. Can you shed any light on this?
What appeared in the article was the full extent of what I know on this topic, and I was leaning heavily on OWC data, and then some.
In the case of a four-year-old MacBook Pro, it seems logical that the older spec SSD might be more compatible, but that's just a deduction.
From Bill S.:
If you want a 1440 x 900 display, why not move to the 15" MacBook Pro instead?
You could then choose a new Ivy Bridge model or a Sandy Bridge refurb (if you want to be able to use 10.6).
IIRC, your laptops are essentially set up as desktops, so the extra size & weight of the 15" vs. the 13" form factor should not be problematic.
Good point. Also with the 15" model, one can go quad-core, and there's that discrete GPU.
I got along quite happily with a 17" PowerBook as my anchor Mac for three years, even when I took it mobile, so I wouldn't find the larger footprint and greater weight a problem.
The inhibiting factor for me would be the higher price of the 15" models.
Charles Moore has been a freelance journalist since 1987 and began writing for Mac websites in May 1998. His The Road Warrior column was a regular feature on MacOpinion, he is news editor at Applelinks.com and a columnist at MacPrices.net. If you find his articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Macintosh 512K Fat Mac, introduced 1984.09.10. The first Mac with enough memory for serious work.
- Support Low End Mac
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Mac Driver Museum
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ