Low End Mac
Search LEM 
Donate · Amazon.com · iResQ · Advertise
Other Cobweb sites: Low End Living · Reformed.net
Quicklinks: · Power Macs · 'Books · Early Macs · Week's Best Deals · OS Downloads
Aquatic Mac

Switching Off Mac OS 9

Andrew W. Hill

"Over 75 percent of customers using these Macs have elected to keep Mac OS X as their default operating system." - Apple Press Release

Okay, so 25% of customers think OS X is confusing enough to go through the bother of switching. I know my Dad didn't like OS X at first, but he didn't want to have to reboot in OS 9 without giving X a shot, so he did. Now he's up to perhaps 50% time in OS X.

If 25% didn't want to bother to learn the already installed Mac OS X, why would they bother to buy a new computer? They'd stick with the aging one until it was no longer good enough. Then, when they have to switch operating systems anyway, they may just buy the cheapest one at the time from Gateway or Dell.

Is Apple saying they're willing to cut their market by 25%?

In my opinion, yes.

Apple did it once before, switching to the Mac from the Apple. There was a transition period with some emulation coming from the Mac XL and the Apple IIgs, and then they cut the Apple line around 1991. So about a seven year transition period.

I know many people that switched to Windows 3.1 instead of Macintosh after dumping their Apple IIs.

Again, switching to the PowerPC architecture. In 1994-95, both PowerPC and 68k systems were released by Apple, but more importantly is the software support. The first Power Mac was shipped in 1994, and the last 68k Mac OS (8.1) was released in 1998. That's a four year transition period.

With OS X, which has been around publicly since late 2000 (with the full release in early 2001), there will have been a two year time when you could run either 9 or X when OS 9 support is cut in 2003.

Very few people will argue that switching from the Apple command line interface to the Macintosh's GUI was a bad thing, even though it cost Apple a significant portion of their user base. Again, nobody will argue that switching from the CISC based 68k series to the RISC based PowerPCs was a bad thing. And five years from now, I don't believe anyone will argue that switching completely to OS X will have been a bad thing.

With the Macintosh, we switched to a more efficient user experience. With the PowerPC architecture, we switched to a more efficient processor design. With Mac OS X, we are switching to a more efficient operating system.

Yes, it's worth it.

<This article is available in a printer friendly format.>

Join us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Google+, or subscribe to our RSS news feed

Andrew W. Hill (a.k.a. Aqua) has been using Macintosh computers since 1987 and maintains that the Mac SE is the perfect Macintosh, superior to all - including the Color Classic. He is on the verge of being evicted from the family home due to its infestation of Macs (last count: about 50). Andrew is attempting to pay his way through college at UC Santa Cruz with freelance Web design and Mac tech support.

Today's Links

Recent Content

<back to Aquatic Mac index>

Aquatic Mac begun December 28, 2001. All Tech Reflections articles ©2001-2003 by Andrew W. Hill. Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Opinions expressed are those of their authors and may not reflect the opinion of Cobweb Publishing. Advice is presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all.
  Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2016 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc. unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Low End Mac, LowEndMac, and lowendmac.com are trademarks of Cobweb Publishing Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iPad, iPhone, iMac, iPod, MacBook, Mac Pro, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.
  Please report errors to .
  LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
  Email may be published at our discretion unless marked "not for publication"; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
  PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it, and we don't share the information we have with others. For more details, see our Terms of Use.

\r\n\r\n"; if ((isset($pool) AND isset($type)) AND (isset($ip) OR isset($ok))) { if (!isset($siteid)) $siteid="270"; if (!isset($pageid)) $pageid="0"; if (!isset($force)) $force=""; if (!isset($keywords)) $keywords=""; if (!isset($pos)) $pos=""; if (!isset($optcode)) $optcode=""; getad($siteid, $pageid, $pool, $type, $ip, $force, $keywords, $pos, $optcode); # $adr = "http://adserver1.backbeatmedia.com:6789/servlet/ajrotator/$siteid/$pageid/viewHTML?pool=$pool&type=$type&ajip=$ip"; # $success = @readfile("$adr"); } ?>

  • Mac of the Day: Centris 610, introduced 1993.02.10. The Mac we used when we started publishing Low End Mac in 1997.
  • List of the Day: The iPhone Group is our forum for discussing and supporting Apple's iPhone.
  • Channels
     Power Macs
     iMac Channel
    Computer Profiles
     Power Mac
     Mac Clones
     Older Macs
    Editorial Archive
    Mac Daniel's Advice
    Email Lists
    LEMchat (uses AIM)
    Online Tech Journal
     advice, reviews
     guides, deals
    Apple History
    Best of the Web
     Best of the Mac Web surveys
    Miscellaneous Links
     Used Mac Dealers
     Video Cards
     Mac OS X
     Mac Linux
     RAM Upgrades
    About Low End Mac
    Site Contacts

    Open Link

    Support LEM


    The Apple Store
    The iTunes Store
    PC Zone
    Crucial Memory

    Our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For detailed price quotes and advertising information, please contactat BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.