Intel Integrated Graphics Finally Good Enough?, New MacBook Air Benchmarked and Reviewed, and More
This Week's PowerBook and iBook News
News & Opinion
- Are Intel Integrated Graphics Finally Good Enough?
- Primate Labs Posts July Mac Benchmarks
- MacBook Air Uses Half-power Thunderbolt
- Wicked Fast 1 TB WD Scorpio Blue Notebook Drive
- Recovering from Hard Drive Failure More Difficult with Lion
- Which Macs Are AirDrop Compatible?
- 15" MacBook Air Coming This Year?
- 4 New MacBook Air Configurations vs. 9 Other MacBooks
- AnandTech: 2011 MacBook Air Thoroughly Reviewed
- Core 'i' MacBook Air Treading on MacBook Pro Turf
- Macworld: Core i5 MacBook Airs Approach Perfection
Products & Services
News & Opinion
Ars Technica's Chris Foresman reports that despite lugubrious predictions of a significant diminishment in graphics performance with the switch to Intel HD Graphics 3000 GPUs (displacing the Nvidia GeForce 320M GPUs in the preceding models), investigation reveals that performance with the with the Sandy Bridge CPU equipped 13" MacBook Pro introduced earlier this year and last week's refresh of the MacBook Air remains largely constant, with the onboard Intel graphics comparable to low-end discrete GPUs, while in many cases reducing overall power consumption.
Publisher's note: Although Intel integrated graphics have long been maligned for lackluster performance, I can't say that I've had any objection to the Intel GMA 950 graphics built into my 2007 Mac mini. I'm not a gamer, and I don't notice any graphics slowdown compared to the AGP 4x Radeon 9000 graphics cards in my dual 1 GHz and dual 1.6 GHz G4 Power Macs - and that's running a 20" ADC Apple Cinema Display at its native 1680 x 1050 resolution with millions of colors (one of the Power Macs is running a 22" Apple Cinema Display at its native 1600 x 1024 resolution, so setups are comparable). dk
Geekbench scores for 2010-2011 MacBook Airs.
Geekbench scores for 2009-2011 Mac minis.
Primate Labs says:
"There are enough results in the Geekbench Result Browser for last week's new Mac models that I can now update the Mac Benchmark charts. To highlight the performance of the new Mac mini and the new MacBook Air I've provided charts . . . that compare the new Macs against other Macs. This allows you to easily see the performance improvements with the new Macs....
"The Sandy Bridge processors in the new Mac mini provide a tremendous boost in performance: the quad-core Mac mini server is 2.3x faster than the previous Mac mini while the dual-core Mac minis are 1.6x to 1.9x faster.
"Another interesting thing (not shown in the chart above) is that the Mac mini Server has roughly the same performance as the entry-level Mac Pro...."
SlashGear's Chris Davies notes that the new MacBook Air may have a Thunderbolt port, but size and cost constraints have led to the updated ultraportable offering reduced external display support in comparison to its MacBook Pro, iMac, and Mac mini siblings, citing an AnandTech report that the Air uses an Eagle Ridge Thunderbolt chip, which only supports half the data channels (two 10 Mbps channels instead of four, which should suffice) of the chip found in the other recent Apple models, as well as a single DisplayPort output.
Hot Hardware's Dave Altavilla says that notebook hard drives have generally followed a similar track as other mobile components, tending to be much smaller, lighter, and consume less power, but also offer lower performance, features, and capacity versus their desktop counterparts.
It's not so long ago that terabyte-sized desktop hard drives were groundbreaking, and Altavilla says notebook hard drive capacities reaching a full terabyte currently have to be considered bleeding-edge, and while a 1 TB notebook drive might be regarded as primarily targeting the mobile workstation market, he's willing to bet there are more than a few pack rats among mainstream laptop users who will be interested in Western Digital's new 1 TB 9.5mm Scorpio Blue 2.5" notebook drive - the first drive to squeeze that capacity into an industry standard 9.5mm, 2.5" SATA form-factor, achieving a density per platter of 500 GB.
Publisher's note: Of particular interest is the fact that this 5400 rpm 6 Gbps SATA drive (not to be confused with the previous 5200 rpm 12.5mm 3 Gbps SATA version), which should draw less power and run cooler than a 7200 rpm drive, actually benchmarks faster than the 7200 rpm WD Scorpio Black, previously among the fastest notebook drives. Pricing is comparable to the 750 GB Scorpio Black, so you 33% get more capacity per dollar and a faster drive with the 5400 rpm 1 TB Scorpio Blue. This could be the ultimate Mac mini and MacBook hard drive upgrade. dk
MacTrast's J. Glenn Künzler says that after ordering a 15" 2011 MacBook Pro on OS X Lion's launch day, suspecting that there might be some interesting differences, he was disappointed when he finally received the new machine a week later, discovering that the main difference is that that purchasers of a post-Lion MacBook Pro no longer have a quick and Apple-sanctioned way to recover from hard drive failure without Apple's intervention.
Hardmac's Lionel notes that that AirDrop, one of the new features of OS X 10.7 Lion, doesn't work on all Macs compatible with the new OS. Only Macs with WiFi cards that can handle both an ad hoc and an infrastructure connection are compatible.
Apple has published a list of compatible Macs:
- MacBook Pro (Late 2008 or newer)
- MacBook Air (Late 2010 or newer)
- MacBook (Late 2008 or newer)
- iMac (Early 2009 or newer)
- Mac mini (Mid 2010 or newer)
- Mac Pro (Early 2009 with AirPort Extreme card, or Mid 2010)
Other models are not compatible, although Lionel says it's theoretically possible to make older Macs that support a mini PCI-Express 1x interface compatible by replacing their AirPort Card with a compatible one, such as the Broadcom BCM94322MC chipset that can be installed in a non-compatible Mac Pro, MacBook (and Pro), iMac, and Mac mini.
Hardmac's Lionel comments on rumors that Apple is testing prototypes of a new laptop halfway between the 15" MacBook Pro (for display size) and the MacBook Air (for thinness) that could be available for the holiday season.
Whether it will be a MacBook Pro or another MacBook Air remains a conundrum, but Lionel muses that removing the SuperDrive and the 2.5" hard drive, which would be replaced by an SSD, as in the MacBook Air, would save a lot of space, but he's skeptical that Apple will be able to keep a CPU consuming 45 W to 55 W at full load in a thin laptop, and would probably have revert to smaller and slower CPUs, probably dual-core models like in the current MacBook Air models.
For that reason, he's of a mind that that these new laptops, if they are ever marketed, will be sold alongside - rather than in place of - the MacBook Pro, at least until heat and power consumption are addressed, hopefully by Intel's coming TriGate technology coupled to the 22 nm manufacturing process.
Lionel adds that while he's serene about losing the SuperDrive, but the disappearance of a 2.5" slot for a hard drive or SSD would be another matter, especially in a Pro laptop, to say nothing of non-upgradable memory should Apple decide to solder the new laptop's RAM to the motherboard like it does with the MacBook Air.
Bare Feats' Rob-Art Morgan says:
"In response to popular demand, this is an attempt to put the 2011 MacBook Air in perspective by comparing it to previous MacBook Airs. We included various examples of MacBook Pro as far back as 2009. For this performance snapshot, we chose Cinebench and Geekbench because they emphasize CPU power, because we've collected test results for both over the past two years, and because you can easily obtain both benchmarking apps to see how your Mac compares....
"With the exception of the 2011 Quad-Core i7 MacBook Pro, the 2011 MacBook Air does well versus MacBook Pros. And it is a significant performance improvement over previous MacBook Airs."
I've avidly perused dozens of Mid 2011 MacBook Air reviews over the past 10 days or so, some of them quite in-depth, but nothing approaching the thoroughgoing analysis of these new machines posted by AnandTech's Anand Lal Shimpi.
Shimpi observes that while last year's MacBook Air updates were great alternatives to cheap, underpowered netbooks, they weren't fast enough to be mainstream computers in 2011, still being powered by Intel Core 2 Duo processors and based on architecture that debuted in 2006. However, Apple has fixed the problem with Intel's 32nm Sandy Bridge family of CPUs.
Like many other commentators, Shimpi notes that the principal shortcomings of the base $999 11" Air configuration is that it only comes with 2 GB of system memory and a 64 GB SSD. He deems the latter excusable if you just don't do much with your system (and technically, it's something you can upgrade down the line if you'd like) but considers the hard-soldered RAM a major problem, severely limiting flexibility, and he'd strongly recommend at least upgrading the memory to 4 GB.
He also observes that while the 11" Air is almost tablet-like, the 13" model still looks and feels like a normal notebook - albeit a really thin, really light notebook that is really a pleasure to use. (And Apple really needs to increase the resolution of its 13" MacBook Pro which has a paltry 1280 x 800 vs. the Air's 1440 x 900 pixel display). He recommends that if you don't need more than 128 GB of internal storage, the way to go is the base 13" model with a 128 GB SSD and 4 GB of RAM at $1,299.
Shimpi concludes that while last year's models may have been great ultraportables, this year's Airs are great notebooks, and if you like thin and light ultraportables, the MacBook Air continues to be one of the best options around.
InfoWorld's Paul Venezia says that despite its many compromises and limitations, he was an early-adopter of the original MacBook Air as his primary laptop, and when the next iteration appeared with a significantly lower price, a solid-state drive, and a faster CPU, he jumped at the upgrade.
However, he concedes that while the Air steadily improved, it had more in common with the MacBook than the MacBook Pro - a good fit for users with general computing workloads, but not those requiring support for heavy-duty, CPU-intensive apps. However, with Apple offering an Air powered by a hyper-threaded, dual-core Intel Core i7 CPU, that's no longer the case, with the Air vaulting into the category of a mobile workstation rather than an ultrathin terminal, Venezia says he expects to see MacBook Airs in places he never would have before, like the recording studios and video production houses that have been the domain of Mac Pros and MacBook Pros.
But there's a catch: Some of the programs those users need are incompatible with OS X 10.7 Lion.
Macworld's Jason Snell notes that with the new models Apple released last month, the MacBook Air has arrived as an anchor product in the Mac lineup - the laptop OS X Lion was designed for. Snell derives the distinct impression that it's only a matter of time before all Mac laptops look like the Air.
Snell reports that the price leader $999 11" Air, powered by a 1.6 GHz Core i5 processor, tests at 1.7 times as fast than the previous $999 model on the same set of processor and storage-focused tests, and on the HandBrake encode test it was 2.4 times as fast, although the switch from the Nvidia GeForce 320M chipset in the preceding models to Intel HD Graphics 3000 IGPUs in the latest models is a mixed story performance-wise, with performance of the 2011 MacBook Air's graphics subsystem "all over the map."
On the other hand, Snell observes that the Airs now being equipped with a Thunderbolt I/O port changes everything - the new connection technology vastly superior not just to USB, but to FireWire and eSATA as well. Fast hard-drive transfers, gigabit ethernet, FireWire compatibility - all of these features are now just a Thunderbolt adapter or three away from being available to MacBook Air users. He notes that with Apple's just-announced 27" Thunderbolt Display you get a FaceTime HD camera, three USB 2.0 ports, a FireWire 800 port, a gigabit ethernet port, and a Thunderbolt port on the back. Plug its Thunderbolt cable into one of the new MacBook Air models, and you essentially convert the laptop into a Core i5-powered desktop computer complete with fast network connection, fast storage, and an array of expansion ports - the old PowerBook Duo concept updated for the 21st Century, and done better than the old Duos.
Snell thinks the pick of the litter is the base 11" Air, and while it might not be the perfect computer, but it's as close to perfect as Apple's ever come in his estimation.
I think that calling a computer with a 64 GB (about 48 GB usable) storage drive and just 2 GB of hard-soldered, non-upgradable RAM "perfect" is just a wee bit extravagant. The new Airs are indubitably among the beat laptops Apple has ever made, but perfection still eludes them by a substantial margin.
Hardmac's Lionel comments on Intel's plan to develop the MacBook Air-flattering Ultrabook market, noting that so far the MacBook Air is the only proven commercial success in that market subsector. He reports that Intel has decided to develop a plan of action in 3 steps.
Step 1 was in June with the launch of the new low power consumption Core i5 and i7, which are already being used in the new MacBook Air.
Step 2 will be mid-2012 with the Ivy-Bridge processors featuring the new TriGate 22 nm manufacturing process, for a even lower electrical consumption and more extensions with the better implementation of Thunderbolt and (finally!) USB 3.0.
Step 3 will occur in 2013 with a new generation of processors with a different architecture, but still in 22 nm, for now code named Haswell - new architecture that Lionel says should be another landmark improvement in electricity consumption.
Publisher's note: Or potential Ultrabook users could just buy the new MacBook Air now. If previous MacBooks are any indication, it will be a better Windows notebook than anyone in the PC industry makes. dk
DigiTimes' Monica Chen and Joseph Tsai report that while Intel is positioning its "ultrabook" as a set of specifications to enable Windows PC partners to design notebooks imitating Apple's MacBook Air, ultrabooks may encounter the same frustrations as the previous round of CULV notebooks did if prices are not lower than those of the Air, according to sources from Taiwan-based supply chain makers.
Chen and Tsai's sources point out that Intel's ultrabook concept brings no new new innovation, but simply a design to allow first-tier notebook players to quickly catch up with Apple's advances in the ultra-thin segment and help the notebook industry recover from the impact of tablet PCs.
For example, Ultrabooks will essentially copy MacBook Air design and engineering points such as li-polymer batteries, metal chassis for better heat dissipation, and a solid state drive (SSD) storage, and (regrettably - ed.) all internal components soldered on to the machine's logic board to save space and reduce weight.
The sources contend that designing an ultrabook based on Intel's technical suggestions at a price lower than the MacBook Air's won't be possible unless Intel is willing to reduce its prices, which already account for one-third of the total cost.
Products & Services
Hardmac's Lionel notes that while Apple's SuperDrive for the MacBook Air and Mac mini is very elegant, it's also very expensive at $79, and also heavy due to its solid aluminum construction.
However, he reports that Samsung has just announced a new line of external DVD drives that can read and write CD 24x, DVD 8x, DVD-RAM 5x, DVD-R DL and DVD +-RW 6x, and will be available in August for $39, half the price of the Apple SuperDrive, and with the added advantage that it will work on any PC or Mac, while the Apple external SuperDrive will work only on a MacBook Air or Mac mini running Snow Leopard or Lion.
For deals on current and discontinued 'Books, see our 13" MacBook and MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, 13" MacBook Pro, 15" MacBook Pro, 17" MacBook Pro, 12" PowerBook G4, 15" PowerBook G4, 17" PowerBook G4, titanium PowerBook G4, iBook G4, PowerBook G3, and iBook G3 deals.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: iMac Core Duo, introduced 2006.01.10. The first Intel-based iMacs ran at 1.83 and 2.0 GHz, came in 17" and 20" sizes.
- Support Low End Mac
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Mac Driver Museum
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ