I think it is sad that some poor guy has to put up with Windows
because "AppleWorks 6 does not have a Microsoft Works converter."
A much better solution would have been to use Works to convert all
the Works documents to RTF (rich text format) when they are archived
on CD to use with a Mac. AppleWorks, TextEdit, and just about any
other word processor can open RTF files.
Also, w/r/t upgrading a 7100, I
have a SuperMac Thunder 24 with
the optional daughtercard, which adds twin AT&T 3210 DSPs, to
make this card into a SuperMac
Thunder II GX 1152. I couldn't get it to run properly with
OS 9 in the II GX configuration, but without the DSP
daughtercard it worked fine - but considerably slower than onboard
video that gets accellerated by the G3. If you know of anyone who
wants the card (the ROM is v3.0), let me know.
I think it's sad that anyone has to put up with Microsoft
Works, let alone Windows. But if that's the standard they have to
work with, you don't have much choice.
Saving files as RTF may sound like a workable solution, but in my
experience it's not a very good one. Export from MS Works to RTF.
Open in AppleWorks and edit. Export from AppleWorks to RTF. Open
in MS Works - and I'll bet you'll see changes in anything but the
most basic documents.
Also, the additonal step of using "Save As..." instead of simply
saving in annoying. A better solution would be MacLinkPlus
translators, which can convert MS Word 4.5 files to
ClarisWorks/AppleWorks format and back again. It cost $100, but it
avoids the need to work with Windows at home if you prefer to use
a Mac.
I don't know of anyone looking for an accelerated NuBus video
card, but you might try listing it on the Low
End Mac Swap List. With over 1,400 subscribers, there's a good
chance someone will be interested.
Hi, The following may come in useful: HFS Explorer <http://www.mars.org/home/rob/proj/hfs/>
and Nero can be used to make Mac HFS/HFS+ volumes on CD or
floppy.
It can also mount HFS HDDs under Windows.
Thanks for the tip. I'll share it with our readers.
More on Using a PC to Download Mac Software
Alykhan Halani writes:
Regarding Keith Oliver's question about downloading Mac software
on a PC, I recently found a utility called HFVExplorer, which,
according to its website, is "an HFS volume browser for Windows NT
and Windows 9x". In other words, it can read and write Mac formatted
media. I have not actually used this utility yet, so I cannot say how
well it works.
You make a good point: Apple needs to first win over classic
Mac users if they really want to win over Windows users.
My full acknowledgment. One could not have said it more
clearly.
As I am the responsible consultant for an organization with about
20 Mac users (and still just one Windows PC) who are using
various versions of Mac OS Classic (from v7.6 to v9.2), this is a
very important point for me, too.
Some of these users are working on a daily basis with an
application that I have written in HyperCard.
I started this programming effort in 1988 on a Macintosh
SE with System 6-something that was the first and only computer
for years in this organization. As things continued to grow (the
organization as well as the application), the application went
smoothly from System 6 to System 7 to OS 8.1 to 8.6 and, on
some machines, to OS 9. The hardware path ran from MC68000,
8 MHz to G4 800 MHz (currently our top Mac here).
With all these hardware and software shifts and changes, the
software (HyperCard, that is) did not give us any trouble, not once.
On the contrary, it took full advantage of all the new hardware
technologies without a hitch.
Personally, I consider HyperCard to be the most excellent software
(in terms of general product quality, clean programming and
flexibility) ever running on the Mac platform, if not on all
platforms.
As you know, Apple's chiefs have decided not to take HyperCard
with them into the "Promised Land" of Mac OS X. (It would not
have been a big investment to do this - Kevin Calhoun, one of the
members of the original HyperCard development team, estimated it to
be six months' work for just two engineers.)
So be it - but I am not going to join the candy-coloured party,
either.
I'll stick with the Mac models which are capable of running Mac OS
Classic and therefore running HyperCard. There are still current Macs
which boot into OS 9, and after that there will be enough
second-hand Macs available that meet our modest computing needs here
for a couple of years.
Thanks to all of you at Low End
Mac for your excellent work in general. I visit your pages nearly
every day. For a frequent buyer of used Mac hardware like me, there
is nothing on the Web that comes close to Low End Mac as a resource.
Thank you.
P.S. On top of all that I wrote above, I am also still a convinced
user of a Newton MessagePad 2100, and so is a friend who is in charge
of approving the hardware and software purchases I recommend.
HyperCard was brilliant. Where MacWrite and MacPaint had made
it possible to be productive with early Macs when you bought them,
HyperCard finally made it possible for Mac users to program their
computers without investing in a programming language.
For better or worse, it joins the ranks of abandonded Apple
software - along with Claris Emailer, Claris Home Page, MacWrite,
MacDraw, MacPaint, Resolve, CyberDog, and others that Apple just
gave up on. (ClarisWorks admittedly made MacWrite, MacDraw,
MacPaint, and Resolve redundant.)
But your HyperCard stacks have not been completely forsaken.
SuperCard
still exists, and SuperCard 4 even runs as an OS X
application. Claiming SuperCard is already 80% compatible with
HyperCard, the manufacturer even provides an application to
convert HyperCard stacks to SuperCard projects. You can even
download a trial version of the software to see if it will work
with your stacks.
If you switch, you'll want to upgrade your copy of HyperCard to
the SuperCard Developer Version ($129). From there, you can create
SuperCard applications using their SuperCard 4 Player, which
eliminates the need to buy additional copies of SuperCard for each
user.
Of course, nobody is going to force you to switch. Keep using the
classic Mac OS until you have a compelling reason to switch. And
when the time comes, you should be able to migrate your stacks to
SuperCard and keep working as you have been for years.
I would take exception to your recommendations regarding a 2x vs.
faster CD ROM drive.
While it is true that the older drives are adequate with most, if
not all, commercially produced CDs, they are most definitely
not with CD-R and CD-RW. I have had plenty of problems with
various CD readers which would not read a homemade disk, and
compatibility seems directly proportional to the speed of the drive.
(Of course, speed is not the issue; it merely correlates to newness
of the drive electronics.)
For instance, on my G3-upgraded 9600s,
the 12x CD drive cannot read disks which the 24x drive has no
problems with. Another example would be my WallStreet,
whose DVD player will read (even without the PC card installed)
homemade CDs which my two 20x drives report as unreadable.
That said, I'd recommend an external CD drive which could more
easily be taken along when he upgrades from the 7100, or even better,
an early external FireWire CD-RW in combination with a USB/FW PCI
card.
I stand by my recommendation. Unless you actually use the
CD-ROM drive regularly and use it for more than simply installing
software, there's not much sense in putting in a faster
CD-ROM.
On the other hand, if working with CD-R and CD-RW is an issue, the
user has no choice but to buy a drive that will read them.
One more thing: There's no way to put a PCI card in a NuBus
Mac.
Granted that Apple does not make drives - few computer makers are
actually making computers but farming out designs to computer mills
- but on a premium product that carries a premium price, I had the
expectation of a higher level of quality control. There's enough
chatter on the iBook forum about hard drives and heat to raise a red
flag.
I suspect the hard drive did not fail because of bad hard drive
design, if it is indeed the hard drive. I suspect the fan. I have not
heard the fan since I did the 10.2.4 and 10.2.5 update. I think this
may be where the problems lies.
More important is the negative impact that bringing a nearly new
iBook into my office for return, an all PC office full of potential
switchers.
As for AppleWorks, I did a little digging into my old versions,
and there wasn't a current Works converter. Now here's an untapped
market! Many home PCs have Works. Once a user starts with Works and
its proprietary format, they are pretty much stuck with Works. This
may not still be true, but even Office does not have a Works
converter - but Works can read some Office files.
Of course, the same could be said of AppleWorks, one of the
ultimate proprietary formats. Not to slam either of these programs
but it is high time we ended these over exclusive document
formats.
I'm sure people who bought Ford Explorers with Firestone
Wilderness AT tires felt the same way as the problems and
recall
unfolded. To this day the question remains whether it was the
tires or Ford's recommendation to keep them underinflated that
caused the problem, but the combination was deadly.
Although poor quality control by a memory or hard drive
manufacturer can reflect poorly on Apple, it is the manufacturer
of the component who is responsible for producing a quality
product. Apple is not an expert on hard drive manufacture; they
have to leave that to the experts. All Apple can do is pick
vendors; they cannot become responsible for every component in
every computer without vastly increasing the price of their
already expensive computers.
Apple is responsible for designing an environment where the
components will work well. If the drives or CPUs or other parts
Apple installs are overheating, Apple is responsible for the poor
airflow or whatever else is causing the problem. And Apple is
usually very good about handling problems, such as replacing the
noisy (wind tunnel) power supplies on early Mirror Drive Door G4s
for free.
As the manufacturer of the computer and company responsible for
integratinig components purchased from various other
manufacturers, Apple is responsible under warranty to replace
defective components - but in the case of hard drives, they
simply turn around and send them back to the manufacturer for
replacment.
Mac users have been dealing with hard drive issues since the
sticktion problems of the 40 MB hard drive era. Hard drives are
one of the few moving parts in a computer. They tend to produce a
fair bit of heat and are the most likely component to fail. Apple
has to pick their suppliers carefully to keep from damaging their
own reputation, and they generally do a very good job of it.
As for MS Works files, the MacLinkPlus translators should solve
your problem.
Apples drivers do not really support PCI GeForce cards. No PCI
GeForce card has ever been released for the Mac, and it is only
through cross-flashing that any PCI GeForce cards have ever
worked in a Mac. Even then these will only work in B/W
G3s and above. (Incidentally the GeForce 2MX PCI/AGP and non-Ti
versions of the AGP GeForce 3 are still the only PC GeForce cards
that can be flashed with a Mac ROM).
Quite frankly though, the thought of putting a GeForce FX 5200 in
a 6500 is ridiculous! Most modern
graphics cards are designed to be fed from an AGP port, and when PCI
versions are released they spend most of their time waiting for the
computer to provide them with more data. That holds true even for
modern Macs and PCs. Any modern graphics card is going to be complete
over kill in a 6200/6500.
Besides, for the cost of a card like this you could probably buy a
second hand beige G3.
I think the reader should accept that his 6500 is not going to get
much faster. The money he considers spending on upgrades would be
far, far better spent on a much newer second-hand Mac. Truthfully,
any more money invested in this machine is wasted money.
However, if he really wants to upgrade the video, his best bet is
either a VooDoo 3 or a Radeon 7000. If he goes the route of the
Radeon 7000, it is only worth it if you flash a PC R7000 (Google
will turn up plenty of results on how to do this). A retail R7000 for
the Mac costs around 100 USD, 25 USD more than the average price of a
Beige G3, which overall would be a much better machine.
At a certain point the cost of upgrading any machine will be more
than the cost of a completely new machine; when this happens it's
time to think rationally and really consider the maths.
We're definitely on the same page there. One upgrade at a time
may make economic sense, but three or four all at once will
invariably cost more than a newer Mac that's better in almost
every respect.
I have almost no experience with the PowerPC Performas, aside from
a "road apple" 5200/75
in the basement that I used to verify that these machines are fine
a freestanding computers but a really, really bad when connected
to other computers.
From my reading, the best PCI video card for Macs is the Radeon
Mac Edition, not the newer Radeon 7000. In Bare
Feats testing, the older Radeon Mac Edition beat the 7000
in every test. If you check completed auctions on eBay,
you'll see that word is getting out - the older Mac Edition is
selling for a lot more than the newer 7000.
Of course, that's the card to pick whether it's going into a 6500,
7600, or beige G3, so buying it
for the hybrid 6200/6500 today means having a great video card for
the next second-hand Power Mac.
eMac Prophecy
Matt Gallagher writes:
I was reading the Low End Mac's "on this day in Mac and LEM
History" and I noticed that exactly 2 years ago today(-ish) you
put forward thoughts that Apple should introduce an iMac for
education called the "eMac" with a 17-inch screen at $699 for
education.
Okay, the eMac has been out for a while (did you get royalties for
the name?) but yesterday it finally hit your exact price-point. Due
to your almost exact 2 year lead-time on this prediction, I thought
I'd tell you...
I'm not worthy.
That is kinda frightening. I suggested Apple could keep the
cost down by eliminating the modem, which is unnecessary on a
networked computer. The CD-ROM eMac had no modem.
I suggested Apple offer CD-ROM, CD-RW, Combo, and SuperDrive
options. Lo and behold, the eMac was offered in all of these forms
- and also with a DVD-ROM drive.
I suggested Apple only offer the eMac in a single color. Snow it
is.
I also explained why a 15" display on a Mac provided as much
information as a 17" display on a PC (well, it did before
OS X). Today 17" is pretty much a minimum for a CRT, as it
very nicely displays 1024 x 768 - and displays 1280 x 960
reasonably well, too.
And the oddest thing of all is that I'm actually considering
buying an eMac for Low End Mac to become my main computer,
replacing my TiBook while it goes in for service - and then
making my 400 MHz TiBook my backup and field computer.
Too bad I didn't think to trademark the name....
Letters sent may be published at our discretion. Email addresses will
not be published unless requested. If you prefer that your message
not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be
edited for length, context, and to match house
style.
Dan Knight has been publishing Low
End Mac since April 1997. Mailbag columns come from email responses to his Mac Musings, Mac Daniel, Online Tech Journal, and other columns on the site.
Wouldn't life be great with an iSlate?, John Hatchett, Recycled Computing, 07.04.
PDAs and smartphones are too small for some tasks, full-fledged Tablet PCs are overkill, and ebook readers are too limited. Apple has the tech to own this niche.
Mac of the Day: Original iMac G3/233, Aug. 98 - The Bondi blue wonder that bounced Apple back to profitability and into the public eye.
List of the Day: Mac Pro List is for those using a Mac Pro.
July 5 in LEM history: 98: The iMac: First of a family? - iMac Perfect for schools - 00: Apple is not your friend - 01: 75 Mac Advantages - Do you trust me? - 02: The joy of X with Classic - The good, the bad, and the intrusive - 05: No Quartz Extreme for Pismo - A brief history of NeXT - 06: Education iMac - iTunes and the French interoperability law - TopXNotes - Apple's secret battery reset utility - Misleading hard drive capacity
The Macintosh Portable started a notebook revolution, Carl Nygren, Classic Macs in the Intel Age, 07.03.
Before Apple introduced the Mac Portable, notebook computers were text-based and ran MS-DOS. Ever since, graphical interfaces have been the norm for laptops.
Our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For detailed
price quotes and advertising information, please
contactat BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number
is for advertising only.